© 2008 Regional Learning Project, The University of Montana, Center for Continuing Education
Teacher Guide for 7th – 12th Grades
for use with the educational DVD
Tribal Perspectives
on American History in the Northwest
The Regional Learning Project collaborates with tribal educators
to produce top quality, primary resource materials about
Native Americans and regional history.
Teacher Guide prepared by
Bob Boyer, Shana Brown, Kim Lugthart, Elizabeth Sperry, and Sally Thompson
Regional Learning Project at the University of Montana–Missoula grants teachers permission to
photocopy the activity pages from this book for classroom use. No other part of this publication
may be reproduced in whole or in part, or stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any
form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without
written permission of the publisher. For more information regarding permission, write to Regional
Learning Project, UM Continuing Education, Missoula, MT 59812.
First Edition
Regional Learning Project extends grateful acknowledgement
to the tribal representatives contributing to this project.
The following is a list of those appearing in the DVD Tribal Perspectives on American
History in the Northwest, from interviews conducted by Sally Thompson, Ph.D.
Lewis Malatare (Yakama)
Lee Bourgeau (Nez Perce)
Allen Pinkham (Nez Perce)
Julie Cajune (Salish)
Pat Courtney Gold (Wasco)
Maria Pascua (Makah)
Armand Minthorn (Cayuse–Nez Perce)
Cecelia Bearchum (Walla Walla–Yakama)
Vernon Finley (Kootenai)
Otis Halfmoon (Nez Perce)
Louis Adams (Salish)
Kathleen Gordon (Cayuse–Walla Walla)
Felix Aripa (Coeur d’Alene)
Cliff Sijohn (Coeur d’Alene)
Jamie Valadez (Elwha Klallam)
Marjorie Waheneka (Cayuse–Palouse)
Dick Basch (Clatsop-Nehalem)
Bobbie Conner (Cayuse–Nez Perce–Umatilla)
Joe Scovell (Clatsop-Nehalem)
George Lagergren (Chinook)
Francis Cullooyah (Kalispel)
Rob Collier (Nez Perce–Walla Walla–Wyam)
Gary Johnson (Chinook)
Edward Claplanhoo (Makah)
Janine Bowechop (Makah)
Stan Bluff (Kalispel)
Acknowledgements
Letter from the Filmmaker 1
Letter from an Educator 3
Getting Started 5
Pre-Viewing Activities 9
Chapter 1 – Introduction 11
Chapter 2 – History through Oral Tradition 17
Chapter 3 – Before Contact 25
Chapter 4 – First Contact (1791-1806) 31
Chapter 5 – Advent of the Fur Trade and its Consequences (1806-1835) 39
Chapter 6 – Missionaries and Early Settlers (1835-1851) 45
Chapter 7 – The Treaties (1851-1856) 51
Chapter 8 – Treaty Aftermath – Nez Perce Story (1856-1877) 67
Chapter 9 – Reections 73
Appendix I: Teaching Resources 77
Appendix II: Standards 83
Appendix III: DBQ Assignment 87
Appendix IV: Deep Mapping 99
Appendix V: Timeline 103
Supplements: Maps; timeline resources inside back cover
Table of Contents
©2008 Regional Learning Project, Center for Continuing Education, The University of Montana
Teacher Guide for 7th – 12th Grades
for use with the educational DVD
Tribal Perspectives
on American History in the Northwest
1
©2008 UM Regional Learning Project
Letter from the Filmmaker
In 2001, Ken Furrow and I began work on a lm project focused on tribes along the
Lewis & Clark Trail. The underlying intention was to provide balance to the celebrations
surrounding the Lewis & Clark Bicentennial by showing how their journey and its conse-
quences are viewed by the descendants of the Indian tribes they had encountered along
the way. The stories we heard were so compelling that we decided to expand the scope
to include more tribes in the Northwest in order to produce this DVD with a focus on the
Northwest. We were awarded a grant from the National Park Service in 2005 in order to
conduct additional interviews.
The content for Tribal Perspectives on American History in the Northwest comes from
oral histories and from visual and narrative sources covering history from tribal memory.
This history begins long before Europeans arrived and continues right up to the present
day. Working with tribal educators to identify appropriate spokespeople, we conducted
in-depth interviews with over 50 people from 15 tribes in the Northwest. Their stories
of rst contact, the fur trade, missionaries, treaties, miners, and homesteaders provide
the content, for this easy to use, chaptered format, designed as a supplement to Middle
School American history textbook subjects.
This project is undertaken in cooperation with the tribes, working with educators from
the region, and being served by a team of tribal advisors working in a design and review
capacity. We want to thank Jack and Claire Nisbet, the teachers who reviewed the draft
material, especially Shana Brown, and Denny Hurtado from OSPI in Washington State for
creating the opportunity for us to share a draft version at the WSIEA conference in 2006.
As a means to introduce differing perspectives about regional history, the voices and
thoughts expressed here will initiate productive discussions among your students. It is our
hope that the information provided by these tribal educators will result in an increased
understanding of and openness toward the many different cultures that inhabit and shape
this region, increased knowledge of regional history, and increased understanding of the
different forms of government in the Northwest.
To further your exploration of the subject matter discussed in this lm, go to
www.trailtribes.org. You’ll nd there a wealth of primary source materials to extend and
expand the content.
Sally Thompson, Ph.D.
Producer–Director
Tribal Perspectives
on American History in the Northwest
2
©2008 UM Regional Learning Project
Tribal Perspectives on American History in the Northwest – Teacher Guide
3
©2008 UM Regional Learning Project
Tribal Perspectives
on American History in the Northwest – Teacher Guide
Letter to My Colleagues
As a teacher of seventeen plus years, I’ve learned one very, very important lesson: Time
marches on, and the teaching that doesn’t become ‘entrenched’ becomes ‘tried and
true.’ You get your rhythm, catch your stride, whatever you want to call it, once you’ve
gotten it, it’s damn hard to let go of it.
Case in point: In 2002 I collected native resources for the social studies department
where I teach. I presented it to the department, got a bunch of nods, and “That’s cool”s,
and I can tell you that the materials are gathering dust on the shelf as I write. I can count
on one hand the times teachers have checked them out.
My colleagues are not bad teachers; the materials just required too much of them. I’m as
guilty as the next teacher…I go to a conference, get introduced to amazing resources, get
pumped up, and then…Monday comes. You take a look at what you’re teaching, and
you just can’t decide what to throw out to make room for that new unit.
So you don’t.
Undeterred, I took a second, third, and eighth stab at it. And then I got smart. I stopped
swimming against the current and started thinking of ways to integrate materials effort-
lessly and seamlessly into what social studies and English teachers already teach. My goal
then, as it is now, is to have at teachers’ ngertips everything they need to teach with
condence. The materials, the activity sheets, the research, where to go for further study.
And it’s for good reason.
I argue that good teachers don’t teach tribal history—or very much of it—not because
they’re racist or insensitive. It’s because they’re afraid of getting it wrong or they don’t
know how to start or where to go. The tribes in their areas, though mostly eager and
forthcoming with materials and information, can seem so inaccessible to the non-Indian.
Teachers may feel like outsiders and choose not to engage at all. That’s where we come
in.
Tribal Perspectives is comprised of a series of interviews organized in chapters that
correspond with state and US history standards and major units of study. All the
interviews are transcribed for student and teacher use, and we’ve provided reproducible
activity sheets for your students. Primary documents, like treaties and early maps,
are reproduced for reference and other student activities. And most importantly, the
interviews are beyond powerful, beyond beautiful, beyond triumphant, and beyond
heartbreaking. Tribal people nally have an unfettered voice in our region’s history.
4
©2008 UM Regional Learning Project
Tribal Perspectives on American History in the Northwest – Teacher Guide
I suggest two ways to use Tribal Perspectives in your classrooms. Since the lm is broken
into small chapters, use one or two chapters at a time to make complete your lessons as
you teach Lewis & Clark, Westward Movement, Native Cultures units, Contemporary
World Problems, statehood, and so on, throughout the year. Or use it as an entire unit.
As the teacher, you get to choose what ts best your classroom.
Tribal Perspectives is the most honest account of Indian existence before and after rst
contact that I’ve ever encountered, and I’ve been digging for over seventeen years. There
is no publisher’s lter through which these oral histories are muddied. There is no chance
that difcult history is obscured or trivialized. Tribal Perspectives pulls no punches when
coming to recounted memories of broken treaties, encroachment, and the subsequent
distrust in anything non-Indian. As a descendant of the Yakama Nation, I condently stand
by Tribal Perspectives’ accuracy and its respect for tribal history and tradition.
When my journey as a tribal history researcher and writer began, I visited my Auntie at
Yakama Nation Fisheries to get more materials. Her boss asked what I was doing. When
I told him I was writing curriculum, he asked, “Are you going to get it right?” Sheepishly I
nodded, “I hope so.” And then he said all that needed to be said, “You’d better.”
We did.
Shana Brown
Educator and Technology Specialist
Shoreline Public Schools, Washington
5
©2008 UM Regional Learning Project
Getting Started
Tribal Perspectives on American History in the Northwest is designed for use at the
middle and high school level. It is a living document representing the traditions,
history, and wisdom of the indigenous peoples of the American Northwest.
Through the viewing of this DVD, you’ll feel like a participant in a dialogue, hearing
perspectives that are not commonly heard in today’s public classrooms.
Topics/Themes
The content is rich and multi-faceted, and covers a range of topics,
including:
the responsibilities of human beings to care for the land
the importance of place-names on the landscape
treaty history and the reservation experience
the impacts of boarding schools
the revival of native languages
the legacy of repatriation
Most importantly, you’ll hear participants discuss the future of the
homelands that their ancestors have cared for “since time immemorial.”
Using this Teacher Guide
We’ve designed this guide to aid you in extending and expanding your
exploration of the topics introduced. In thinking about your teaching
responsibilities, we’ve designed learning activities in keeping with National
Standards in Social Science and Language Arts (see tables in Appendix II).
Due to the density of information covered, we suggest that you rst preview
the entire DVD to determine how the material can be integrated into your
overall coursework. You may wish to review the material in the classroom
one chapter at a time, to achieve the greatest student understanding.
The Pre-Viewing Activities on page 9 can assist you in establishing context
for the history of the region. These activities include primary documents for
you to copy and distribute to the class, providing history-driven Language
Arts lessons.
Getting Started
6
©2008 UM Regional Learning Project
Tribal Perspectives on American History in the Northwest – Teacher Guide
The DVD (75 minutes total running time) is divided into nine chapters that
range from 3 to 27 minutes in length, listed here with time codes for each:
Chapter 1: Introduction (4:15 minutes)
Chapter 2: History Through Oral Tradition (7:20 min)
Chapter 3: Before Contact (6:55 min)
Chapter 4: First Contact (10:00 min)
Chapter 5: Advent of the Fur Trade and its Consequences (7:20 min)
Chapter 6: Missionaries and Early Settlers (6:50 min)
Chapter 7: The Treaties (27:00 min)
Chapter 8: Treaty Aftermath - Nez Perce Story (5:30 min)
Chapter 9: Reections (3:55 min)
Features in each Chapter
At the beginning of each chapter, you will nd materials arranged as follows (where
applicable):
Pre-Viewing Activities
Key Concepts
Vocabulary Terms
Places
People
Essential Questions
Post-Viewing Activities
Transcript text (verbatim text from each chapter of the lm)
The suggested Pre-Viewing Activities for Key Concepts, Vocabulary,
Places, People, and Essential Questions are intended to deepen students’
understanding of content; Post-Viewing Activities are provided to expand the
learning opportunities presented in the lm and guide.
These features will help you orient students to the historical and cultural
concepts, new vocabulary, geography and the people of the region. Key
Concepts are highlighted as being important to the understanding of the
narrative of the interviews. The Vocabulary, Places and People offer
opportunities to further enhance overall understanding of the material covered.
The complete transcript text for each chapter is included to provide an easy
reference to the materials presented in the DVD. This text is an exact rendition
of each individual’s interview in the DVD; therefore, the text reects the
nuances of each speaker regardless of language usage and/or spelling.
The appendices in this guide provide you with a catalogued suggested reading
7
©2008 UM Regional Learning Project
list, the state and national curriculum standards specic to this guide and
accompanying DVD, and complete resources for the pre-viewing activities
described on page 9.
Examples of Activities
The following activities are general suggestions and guidelines for using the
features in this guide to integrate the material provided in each chapter into your
classroom. Specic suggestions are included at the beginning of each chapter.
Key Concepts Activity 1 – Jigsaw
Divide class into equal groups.1.
Assign each group an equal number of key concepts to investigate.2.
Using the library and the internet, attempt to dene the meaning of 3.
each concept. Discuss how each concept relates to US history or
the particular unit they are presently studying.
Report your ndings to the rest of the class by answering the 4.
following questions:
Describe your understanding of the concept.
How might this concept apply to Indian tribes in the Northwest?
How might this concept apply to non-tribal people and groups?
Key Concepts Activity 2 – Predicting
Have each student pick (a number) of terms from the list of key 1.
concepts.
Give the class ten minutes to free write the denition of each of the 2.
terms they have chosen. What do they think the term means?
After watching the DVD chapter, have the students review their 3.
predictions. Were they correct? What are some of the context
clues in the documentary that helped them to get the denition?
Vocabulary Terms Activity – Building Vocabulary
Alone, in pairs, or in groups, have students develop a working 1.
denition for each vocabulary word.
Optional– have students report after viewing how their vocabulary 2.
word was used in the chapter they viewed.
Optional– Have students nd real world or researched instances 3.
of the term during their study of this unit (not just its occurrence,
but how, for example, misconceptions might have affected the
President’s initial view on global warming).
Getting Started
8
©2008 UM Regional Learning Project
Tribal Perspectives on American History in the Northwest – Teacher Guide
Places Activity
As a geographic orientation to each chapter, use the maps provided
in the pocket inside the back cover of this guide.
Use the “Base Map: USGS Northwest States” and “Northwest Tribal
Homeland Territories” maps to compare historic and contemporary
locations of Indian people.
Consider the place names provided at the beginning of each
chapter, and whether they can be located on the contemporary
or historic maps. If not, speculate on why. How are these places
important to the story being told? Can you locate each place on a
map, using a web quest if needed?
Also, please see the Deep Mapping Assignment for each chapter, in
Appendix IV of this guide.
People Activity
Consider the names of people provided at the beginning of
each chapter. Determine whether they are the names of tribes,
individuals, groups of people, etc.
If they are names of tribes, nd historic and contemporary locations
on the maps provided, if possible. If they are names of individuals,
what can you nd out about them? (Students could start a regional
biography project.) If groups of people, how are they important to
the history being told?
Essential Questions Activity
Teacher Directions:
Before your students view each chapter, read aloud the essential
questions and have students think of their initial response to the
questions. (Optional–have them write their initial responses.)
Make individual students or student groups responsible for
becoming the ‘expert’ of the questions you have assigned them
and report back to the class after they have viewed this chapter.
Student directions:
Alone, in pairs, or in groups, focus on the essential questions your
teacher has assigned you. Think about the questions during and
after your viewing of this chapter.
Prepare a response to your assigned questions and share with your
group or class, as directed by your teacher.
Visit www.trailtribes.org, for additional information
on many of the tribes along the trails followed by Lewis and Clark.
9
©2008 UM Regional Learning Project
Pre-Viewing Activities
Each chapter is self-contained with both pre-viewing and post-viewing activities included
for your convenience. In addition, we provide three acitivities here, with detailed
instructions and supplemental material supplied in appendices, to deepen and expand the
understanding of the subjects covered in the DVD.
The following activities are designed for students to investigate primary sources and learn
about some of the experiences of Native American people. The activities are designed to
provide some background knowledge for your students when viewing the accompanying
DVD Tribal Perspectives on American History in the Northwest.
The original documents and instructions for these activities are attached in the Appendices
located at the end of this guide, as directed below. The map resources and timelines are
located inside the back cover.
Document Based Question (DBQ) assignment (Appendix III):
Students are instructed to read a primary source document. They then
answer a series of “scaffolding” questions designed to help students build
a foundation for responding to the essay question that follows.
Appendix III contains complete instructions.
Deep Mapping Assignment (Appendix IV):
Each chapter of this guide has corresponding Deep Mapping prompts to
be completed prior to viewing. Historical and contemporary maps are
provided for the completion of the assignment. Students may create their
own maps, reecting the historical and geographical variances of the
history of the American Northwest.
Appendix IV contains complete instructions.
Timeline Assignment (Appendix V):
Native peoples of the Americas continue to utilize traditional methods
for keeping their tribal histories. Oral traditions and various time-keeping
methods such as Winter Counts on the Great Plains, or Time Balls in the
Northwest are such examples. This activity is designed for students to
reect upon their own stories about who they are and where they live.
Appendix V contains complete instructions.
Pre–Viewing Activities
10
©2008 UM Regional Learning Project
Tribal Perspectives on American History in the Northwest – Teacher Guide
11
©2008 UM Regional Learning Project
This chapter argues that the ability to tell one’s own history is vital in getting a well-
rounded picture of a particular event.
Suggestion: integrate this content into the beginning of your Manifest Destiny unit, or
any lesson where primary documents are used.
Pre-Viewing Activities (20-40 minutes)
Key Concepts
written history and the power of dening people
political identity – United States history and Tribal history
oral tradition: Indian values and beliefs
expansion of the Northwest
Predicting Activity
Break students into four groups, with each group taking one 1.
of the concepts provided above. Ask each group to predict
how their concept relates to US history.
Report back to the class, and make sure each group focuses 2.
on revisiting their key concept after the viewing of this
chapter.
Vocabulary Terms
ideology myths
misconceptions animosity
Alone, in pairs, or in groups, have students develop a working 1.
denition for each vocabulary word.
Optional– have students report after viewing how their 2.
vocabulary word was used in the chapter they viewed.
Optional– Have students nd real world or researched 3.
instances of the term during their study of this unit (not just
its occurrence, but how, for example, misconceptions might
have affected the President’s initial view on global warming.)
Essential Questions (make this a part of the student transcript handout, if you wish)
Why is it important for any group, ethnic, cultural, or 1.
otherwise, to be able to exercise their own voices in telling
their history the way they know it?
What might be some lasting effects, both individually and 2.
collectively, in telling one’s own story – especially if it differs
from the ‘authority’s’ perspective?
Chapter 1
Chapter One: Introduction
12
©2008 UM Regional Learning Project
Tribal Perspectives on American History in the Northwest – Teacher Guide
Why is ‘truth’ a relative term?3.
Why do many mainstream groups tend to distrust or discount 4.
oral tradition as a valid account of the past?
What does Lewis Malatare mean when he refers to the 5.
“glorious accounts of what occured, which actually didn’t
occur” in Washington and Montana state history? How did
non-Indians who came West suffer?
Teacher Directions:
Before your students view this chapter, read aloud the
essential questions and have students think of their initial
response to the questions. (Optional–have them write their
initial responses.)
Make individual students or student groups responsible for
becoming the ‘expert’ of the questions you have assigned
them and report back to the class after they have viewed this
chapter.
Student directions:
Alone, in pairs, or in groups, focus on the essential questions
your teacher has assigned you. Think about the questions
during and after your viewing of this chapter.
Prepare a response to your assigned questions and share with
your group or class, as directed by your teacher.
Viewing (4:15 minutes)
i. Teacher transcript
ii. Student transcript, complete with essential questions (at
the beginning), spaces for notes and personal reections.
Post-Viewing Activities (20-30 minutes)
Allow students to nish their notes and reections.1.
Ask how, if at all, their perspectives about the validity of oral accounts 2.
of history have changed.
If appropriate, ask the question, “How does this chapter relate to 3.
what we are studying now in our social studies class?”
Optional– Discuss, debate, ponder, write on the following question: 4.
“Is oral history a valid account of history?”
Optional– Create a graphic in response to one or more of the 5.
assigned questions (this would probably be homework or extra credit).
For Further Study: See Appendix I sections for Stereotypes in General, Indian
Mascots, and Languages and Dialects.
13
©2008 UM Regional Learning Project
Transcript
Chapter 1 – Introduction
(4:15 minutes)
Note: Transcript text is an exact rendition of each
interview, without corrections for grammar, etc.
Julie Cajune – Salish
There’s a huge political amount of capital in the
telling of history. Alan Munslow said that history is
never innocent storytelling. It’s a primary vehicle
through which power is distributed and used.
And so the whole notion of political identity and
ideology and who the United States is as a nation
plays into how the story is told, and who has
gotten to tell the story. And so the idea of letting
Indian people tell that story themselves, I think, is
powerful and progressive.
Lewis Malatare – Yakama
Allow us to give the history of our people the
way we want it to be told. Not the way it was
written in the books. Not the way it’s portrayed
in newspapers of the past, magazines, and other
media. We need to be able to show the people
who we really were, are, what we are going to be
tomorrow.
Lee Bourgeau – Nez Perce
Nobody can tell our story like we can. We have
a lot of oral traditions and oral history that has
come down that hasn’t been written anywhere,
and a part of that is our values.
Allen Pinkham – Nez Perce
Indian people have never had voices in
interpretation of the expansion of the Northwest,
simply because we were never considered
experts. There are a lot of myths; there are
misunderstandings, misconceptions about Indian
people. We need to clarify what we are and who
we are in our terms.
Lewis Malatare – Yakama
If we go back to the people of non-Indian decent
and ask them how they eventually came to our
country, they have many hidden stories that they
Notes
Chapter 1 Transcript
14
©2008 UM Regional Learning Project
Tribal Perspectives on American History in the Northwest – Teacher Guide
don’t want to talk about. Because you read
the history books - Washington State history,
Montana State history - you will see a glorious
account of what had occurred, which actually
didn’t occur. So I can understand some of the
animosity of the non-Native American people
when it comes to this point. So when Lewis &
Clark Bicentennial came to the Yakama nation,
we said this should be a time of healing on both
sides, the non-Indians as well as the Indian, so
that we may be able to better understand the
sufferings of both sides.
Julie Cajune – Salish
To a lot of people in America it’s really
disconcerting to look at American history
in a very different way. And I know that it’s
unsettling because we like to believe that
people are good, we want to believe that our
leaders are good, we want to believe that their
intentions are good, and we want to feel good
about that, but we can’t always look at history
and feel good. But I think it’s really important
for America to become honest about that. We
need to rethink how we relate to other people
and how we treat other people, and being
honest about that in telling our story. I think
that’s important for America to come of age
in that way. And so I think that this is one way
that we can start to do that - by telling the truth
about how this country evolved, about how this
country came to be, and who paid the cost.
Notes
15
©2008 UM Regional Learning Project
Notes
“Chief Charlo, Secretary Gareld and their sons”, Aug., 1907 (Bitterroot Valley, Montana)
K. Ross Toole Archives and Special Collections
Chapter 1 Transcript
16
©2008 UM Regional Learning Project
Tribal Perspectives on American History in the Northwest – Teacher Guide
17
©2008 UM Regional Learning Project
Chapter Two: History Through Oral Tradition
This chapter presents the widespread Indian belief that they did not migrate to this
continent, but that they originated here. It also continues discussion about the accuracy
of oral tradition and the commerce system of Plateau and Coastal Indian nations.
Suggestion: integrate material introduced here into the beginning of your US history
class.
Pre-Viewing Activities (20 minutes)
Key Concepts
land bridge theory
multi-perspective nature of oral tradition
oral tradition as an indicator of time
continuity of culture
places of origin: creation vs. migration
Predicting Activity (Key Concepts)
Break students into ve groups, assigning a key concept 1.
to each, and ask each group to predict how their concept
relates to US history.
Report back to the class and make sure each group focuses 2.
on revisiting their key concept after the viewing of this
chapter.
Vocabulary Terms
continuity bilingual
migration
Alone, in pairs, or in groups, have students develop a working 1.
denition for each vocabulary word.
Optional–have students report after viewing how their vocabulary 2.
word was used in the chapter they viewed.
Optional–have students nd real world or researched instances 3.
of the term during their study of this unit (not just its occurrence,
but how, for example, misconceptions might have affected the
President’s initial view on global warming.)
Places
Columbia River Country Celilo (Oregon)
Dalles (Oregon) Lolo Trail (MT and ID)
Southern Nez Perce Route (MT and ID)
What do you know about these places? What can you learn about them from
this chapter? What is important about these places?
Chapter 2
18
©2008 UM Regional Learning Project
Tribal Perspectives on American History in the Northwest – Teacher Guide
Essential Questions (make this a part of the student transcript handout, if you wish)
How can language play a role in forming one’s own cultural 1.
and ethnic identity?
How can language maintain cultural values and traditions?2.
How might oral tradition be more accurate than written 3.
accounts of historical events? Can you think of examples
from history as well as your own experience?
What kind of societies were in the “bare space” Otis 4.
Halfmoon refers to?
What denes a civilization? How did the bare spaces on 5.
the earliest maps of the area t that denition? Why were
Indians regarded as “uncivilized” in the early contact period?
Teacher Directions:
Before your students view this chapter, read aloud the
essential questions and have students think of their initial
response to the questions. (Optional–have them write their
initial responses.)
Make individual students or student groups responsible for
becoming the ‘expert’ of the questions you have assigned
them and report back to the class after they have viewed this
chapter. Also mention that the once commonly believed
theory that tribes migrated to North America via the Land
Bridge has been challenged and arguably disproved on
a number of occasions by fossil and other archeological
evidence.
[See 1491 by Charles C Mann; The Atlantic Monthly, Mar 2002,
Vol. 289, Iss. 3, pg. 41, David Burton’s “The Bering Land Bridge
Theory Collapsing”; Vine DeLoria, Jr.’s Red Earth, White Lies:
Native Americans And The Myth Of Scientic Fact.]
Student directions:
Alone, in pairs, or in groups, focus on the essential questions
your teacher has assigned you. Think about the questions
during and after your viewing of this chapter.
Prepare a response to your assigned questions and share with
your group or class, as directed by your teacher.
19
©2008 UM Regional Learning Project
Viewing (4:15 minutes)
i. Teacher transcript
ii. Student transcript, complete with essential questions (at
the beginning), spaces for notes and personal reections.
Post-Viewing Activities (20-30 minutes)
Allow students to nish their notes and reections.1.
Ask how, if at all, students’ perspectives about the land bridge theory 2.
and their own conceptions of how Indian tribes use to live have
changed.
If appropriate, ask the question, “How does this chapter relate to 3.
what we are studying now in our social studies class?”
Optional– Discuss, debate, ponder, write on the following 4.
statement: “The creation beliefs of Indian nations in this area are
just as valid as other groups’ creation beliefs.”
Optional– Create a graphic in response to one or more of the 5.
assigned questions (this would probably be homework or extra
credit).
For Further Study: See Appendix I sections for General Teaching about Pacic
Northwest Tribal People, and Spirituality and Culture (Bering Land Bridge Theory,
and Kennewick Man section).
Also see the website www.trailtribes.orgSince Time Immemorial sections for each
tribal group.
Chapter 2
20
©2008 UM Regional Learning Project
Tribal Perspectives on American History in the Northwest – Teacher Guide
Transcript
Chapter 2 – History Through Oral
Tradition (7:20 minutes)
Note: Transcript text is an exact rendition
of each interview, without corrections for
grammar, etc.
Tribes of the region speak many different
languages, follow unique traditions, and
have their own distinct histories. These
histories have been passed down orally,
through the generations.
Pat Courtney Gold – Wasco
When I contrast the 10,000-year history of
the Wasco people, with the 230 some odd
years of the United States it’s really difcult
to get the concept across of how the history
denes who I am. What my history reects
is a continuity of a language, a continuity of
a culture. And it’s really difcult to try to get
this concept across to someone from a culture
that’s so young.
Maria Pascua – Makah
All the older people, what they always have
said is we’ve been here since the beginning of
time, since the rst daylight.
Armand Minthorn – Cayuse/Nez Perce
There is no migration story. We were created
here. We did not cross any land bridge. We
have our creation story here. It would take
me three days to tell you that story, but we
were created here, we’ve always been here.
Our traditions and our language, specically,
has not changed. We have songs, we have
customs that are handed down generation to
generation. And because of that we’ve been
able to maintain a way of life that has been
carried for thousands of years. And when we
can go back and say this spot and this spot
and this area was used at this time by these
people, that’s what continues for us a way to
keep our past a part of our everyday life.
Notes
21
©2008 UM Regional Learning Project
Chapter 2 – Transcript
Cecelia Bearchum – Walla Walla/
Umatilla
You know how oral history is really done,
years ago, what they would do is if there
were several of them that experienced the
same thing, whatever happened, a ght,
or whatever, they would all sit down and
each person would tell their version of what
happened. And then the next person would
do the same thing, and they’d go clear
around, and then all of them would put it
together the way they thought it actually
happened. And that was oral history.
Allen Pinkham – Nez Perce
We traveled this whole continent, and we
called it an island. We called the United
States, the northern, western, hemisphere
here an island. Well how do we know that?
How do we know that there was water all
the way around? Because we went there.
Very simple. Very simple and direct. That’s
why we called this continent an island
because there’s water to the south, there’s
water to the west, there’s water to the east,
and there’s a great lake to the north of us.
We spoke of a country that was hot all year
long. Well how did we know that? We must
have been there. And we speak of these
traveling stories, just little bits and pieces of
information, that tells me quite a bit. A Nez
Perce went so far south he seen an animal
he never seen before and he called it <Nez
Perce> which means imitator, which is the
monkey. So those little bits and pieces of
information carry a lot of signicance.
Vernon Finley – Kootenai
There were always individuals who went
outside of the aboriginal territory. For
example, there was knowledge in the stories
of the east coast, of the ocean on both
coasts. In fact one of the traders that came
through right around 1800 and right before
then, one of the Kootenai women helped
guide them out to the west coast. So they
were aware of the entire continent.
Notes
22
©2008 UM Regional Learning Project
Tribal Perspectives on American History in the Northwest – Teacher Guide
Otis Halfmoon – Nez Perce
I know from reviewing some of the maps
of years ago of what Lewis & Clark and all
them studied before their westward journey
and there’s nothing but a bare space.
And that’s how many people perceive the
country as a bare space. It was not at all.
It was tribes everywhere going to and fro -
commerce. You had trader tribes and things
of this nature. And that’s just how they got
along. You had to get along that way.
Maria Pascua – Makah
It was common especially for the men who
did the trading to know more than one
language. Both my grandparents on my
dad’s dad’s side and my dad’s mother’s side
spoke at least ve languages, plus.
Otis Halfmoon – Nez Perce
And there are two major passes into the
buffalo country <Nez Perce>, and that’s
now called Lolo trail, another one was the
Southern Nez Perce Route. And so that
went down to another lifestyle of the buffalo
hunting people. And also too you go west
from there, you go to the Columbia River
country.
Pat Courtney Gold – Wasco
The Columbia River was also equivalent of a
freeway. People traveled up and down the
river, not only to visit, but that was one of
our main activities was the commerce, the
trading.
So the people upriver in the tributaries
would come down to roughly the Dalles
area. Nicloidi was one of the main trading
areas, Celilo and Nicloidi. So that area was
very important to our lifestyle, and all of
our legends were based on the geography
of that area. And the geography was really
interesting because it was all basalts and
we had all these basalt cliffs. And we also
had lava along the Columbia River, and this
was before the dams were built, you could
see the texture of lava. So we had stories
relating to the texture of these lavas, and we
Notes
23
©2008 UM Regional Learning Project
Chapter 2 – Transcript
had stories relating to the different valleys
through the basalt cliffs.
Maria Pascua – Makah
If you compared our place names with
say a state map, the amount of names that
we have for our area is immense. Every
little creek that’s too small to be on maybe
someone else’s map, we have a name for it.
Armand Minthorn – Cayuse/Nez Perce
So our histories that we have about our past
have a lot to do with the environment and
nature’s elements, whether they be water,
snow, rain, even heat, droughts. Those are
the indicators that we use within our oral
histories to help gauge us with the time.
Nez Perce Chiefs, by Nicolas Point, ca 1845 Courtesy of Loyola Press, Chicago.
Notes
24
©2008 UM Regional Learning Project
Tribal Perspectives on American History in the Northwest – Teacher Guide
25
©2008 UM Regional Learning Project
Chapter 3
Chapter Three: Before Contact
This chapter discusses the benets of trade among Indian nations and non-Indian traders
and trappers and its deadly consequence of disease and famine.
Suggestion: integrate materials introduced here into the Epidemics, Revolution (trade
routes), and/or Manifest Destiny units of your US history class, or when reviewing First
Nations units from earlier grades.
Pre-Viewing Activities (10-15 minutes)
Key Concepts
diffusion of horses, guns and disease
universal language
Predicting Activity (Key Concepts)
Ask students to write or discuss how the diffusion of horses, 1.
guns, and disease might have affected tribal nations in this
area.
Ask students to dene for themselves the concept of 2.
“universal language.”
Vocabulary Terms
misconception mobility
decimated epidemics
famine European technology
Alone, in pairs, or in groups, have students develop a working 1.
denition for each vocabulary word.
Optional– Have students report after viewing how their vocabulary 2.
word was used in the chapter they viewed.
Optional– Have students nd real world or researched instances 3.
of the term during their study of this unit (not just its occurrence,
but how, for example, misconceptions might have affected the
President’s initial view on global warming.)
Places
Straits of Juan de Fuca (Washington)
Nisqually (Washington)
Vancouver (Washington)
Columbia River
(Upper) Missouri River
Locate these places on the USGS Northwest States map (provided in the back of this
guide).
26
©2008 UM Regional Learning Project
Tribal Perspectives on American History in the Northwest – Teacher Guide
People
Nez Perce Pueblo Navajo
Comanche Apache Shoshone
Cayuse Salish Walla Walla
Couer d’ Alene Blackfeet Kootenai
Klallam Yakima
If possible, locate these tribes on the map of Northwest Tribal Homeland Territories.
If unable to locate on this map, try a web quest to determine location and
understand why they are not on the northwest map.
Essential Questions (make this a part of the student transcript handout, if you wish)
How did the advent of horses and rearms through trading 1.
with non-Indians change Indian societies?
How did disease epidemics predate initial contact with non-2.
Indians?
Compare the advent of horses and rearms (see Otis 3.
Halfmoon’s excerpt) to the current proliferation of nuclear
weapons worldwide. Will societies, regardless of ethnicity or
culture, always respond to weaponry this way?
Teacher Directions:
Before your students view this chapter, read aloud the
essential questions and have students think of their initial
response to the questions. Optional– Have them write their
initial responses.
Make individual students or student groups responsible for
becoming the ‘expert’ of the questions you have assigned
them and report back to the class after they have viewed this
chapter.
Student Directions:
Alone, in pairs, or in groups, focus on the essential questions
your teacher has assigned you. Think about the questions
during and after your viewing of this chapter.
Prepare a response to your assigned questions and share with
your group or class, as directed by your teacher.
27
©2008 UM Regional Learning Project
Viewing (6:55 minutes)
i. Teacher transcript
ii. Student transcript, complete with essential questions (at
the beginning), spaces for notes and personal reections.
Post-Viewing Activities (20-30 minutes)
Allow students to nish their notes and reections.1.
Ask students if they believe these accounts of trade and disease. Are they 2.
more or less believable than what they would read in a textbook or online?
Why?
If appropriate, ask the question, “How does this chapter relate to what we are 3.
studying now in our social studies class?”
Optional– Discuss, debate, ponder, write on the following question: “Is it 4.
important to declare English the ofcial language of the United States? What
are the potential unintended consequences for non-native speakers?”
Optional– Create a graphic in response to one or more of the assigned 5.
questions (this would probably be homework or extra credit).
For Further Study: See Appendix I section for Language and Dialects.
Also see the website www.trailtribes.org – Traditional Culture sections for each
tribal group.
Chapter 3
"American Falls" on the Snake River, with the Three Buttes in background, from Report of Fremont's Exploring Expedition 1843-'44.
Courtesy University of Montana's Manseld Library, K. Ross Toole Archives.
28
©2008 UM Regional Learning Project
Tribal Perspectives on American History in the Northwest – Teacher Guide
Transcript
Chapter 3 – Before Contact (6:55
minutes)
Note: Transcript text is an exact rendition of each
interview, without corrections for grammar, etc.
Long before Indian people of the Northwest
saw Europeans, they knew of them. The
“moccasin telegraph” carried the news to
distant places, and aspects of European
culture preceded the actual arrival of these
new people.
Louis Adams – Salish
The people were pretty happy when they rst
run onto the white man because they thought
he come from the light. But even before that, I
used to hear some of the old people say when
Columbus landed on the coast. See, the universal
language was sign language, so when they rst
landed the communication was pretty fast. Pretty
soon they found out that somebody had landed
on the shores of this great country. And they used
to say, when they rst landed the Indians laid out
beaver pelts and bear hides and buffalo robes and
whatever they valued for him to walk on because
they thought he was something special.
Before ever seeing a white man, many native
peoples were exposed to European technology,
such as guns, and to other things they desired,
such as horses. And they were exposed to things
they dreaded – smallpox and other contagious
diseases.
Otis Halfmoon – Nez Perce
Trade was very, very important to the people,
again to gain certain things, the coming of the
horse, the metal, the ries, things of this nature. I
know some of the history books state that the Nez
Perce received the horses in 1720, 1730 and I
dispute that. I believe the Nez Perce got it maybe
1680s, maybe even 1690. Consider, the Spanish
that came up there with their horses among the
Pueblos, the Navajos, and the Apaches, and the
Comanche’s. It is like a brand new weapon on the
block. Like even today, everyone wants nuclear
Notes
29
©2008 UM Regional Learning Project
weapons, and back in those days word must have
spread so fast about this new creature, it makes
life so easy.
Kathleen Gordon – Cayuse/Walla Walla
The Shoshones came with ponies and then the
Cayuses got a couple of those ponies and they
started breeding Cayuse ponies. They were small
and they were really fast and so it was just what
they needed, a small fast horse. So they just kept
breeding Cayuses and they had thousands of
Cayuse horses at one time.
Felix Aripa – Coeur d’Alene
<Native language> Said, when we got horses it
opened up for us to go, that’s when they can go
buffalo hunting. They can go all different places,
they can go visit their neighboring tribes, you
know, to the <Native language>. Said, Oh gee,
that was accommodating.
Cliff SiJohn – Coeur d’Alene
In most cases our enemies were the Blackfeet.
They had guns and we didn’t have any, and we
began trading for guns. That’s what we wanted.
Vernon Finley – Kootenai
Prior to David Thompson arriving in 1800,
there was…the Blackfeet had rst traded with
Thompson and rst traded with the traders, so
they had guns. The Kootenais just had bows, and
so they knew the value of the guns because it
had been introduced but they didn’t have a lot
of them. And so it was kind of a pretty uneven
match, you know, with trying to war with the
Blackfeet who were invading the territory and
they had guns.
Julie Cajune – Salish
And people have a misconception that we always
lived on this side of the mountains, but that’s
incorrect. And that decision for all of the bands to
move on this side of the mountains was really due
to several factors.
You know, horses of course increasing mobility,
and the likelihood of people encountering
other tribes, some of them might be hostile. The
competition for resource in our hunting grounds
Notes
Chapter 3 – Transcript
30
©2008 UM Regional Learning Project
Tribal Perspectives on American History in the Northwest – Teacher Guide
and the acquisition of rearms by enemy tribes
before us. And the traders, you know, were
held hostage by the Blackfeet in particular, and
threatened that they’d be skinned alive, I think in
one journal I read, if they gave guns to the Salish.
You know, not only will we kill you, but it won’t
be a pleasant death, you know.
And so that military power imbalance that
happened, you know, if you think of a modern
gun back then, you know, versus a bow and
arrow or a war club, it had a huge impact on
a tribe that had already been decimated by
smallpox. I think people have said at least a third
of our community, or of the Salish tribe, were
lost to smallpox. There were two big epidemics.
Jamie Valadez – Elwha Klallam
The diseases hit before the ships came into the
Straits of Juan de Fuca around 1790. Already
villages were ravaged because of Vancouver.
And so it came through Nisqually, through the
interior that way, because there was trading clear
down to Nisqually, the tribes, they traveled far in
their trading and so they had already known that
another culture, another people were coming,
coming west.
Lewis Malatare – Yakama
In the 1780s, there was great, great famine.
There was great diseases that came down the
Columbia River. Our people died from fever
and scars upon their face, and wasn’t able to
eat, wasn’t able to drink water. We couldn’t
cool their bodies down, and villages totally
disappeared along the Columbia River.
Vernon Finley – Kootenai
And all the trade came up the Missouri, so when
the small pox epidemic started to wipe people
out down in Missouri the trade among Indian
tribes brought it up long before the white people
ever arrived, and so there were epidemics before
they came along. When Lewis and Clark come
along and they speak in their journals about
deserted villages, they weren’t deserted. They
had been wiped out by the smallpox that had
preceded them.
Notes
31
©2008 UM Regional Learning Project
Chapter Four: First Contact
This chapter discusses the perceptions and encroachment of non-Indians onto Indian
lands before the treaty era.
Suggestion: integrate into the Manifest Destiny units of your US history class.
Pre-Viewing Activities (20 minutes)
Key Concepts
native perspectives of westward expansion as an “invasion”
genocide
redistribution of wealth in tribal societies
Predicting Activity (Key Concepts)
Ask students to write about why tribes view Westward 1.
Expansion as an invasion.
Ask students to dene what qualies as or constitutes 2.
“genocide.”
Vocabulary Terms
genocide generosity
humanity arrogance
connive pilfer
longhouse
Alone, in pairs, or in groups, have students develop a working 1.
denition for each vocabulary word.
Optional– Have students report after viewing how their vocabulary 2.
word was used in the chapter they viewed.
Optional– Have students nd real world or researched instances 3.
of the term during their study of this unit (not just its occurrence,
but how, for example, misconceptions might have affected the
President’s initial view on global warming.)
Places
Neah Bay (Washington)
Freshwater Bay (Washington)
Discovery Bay (Washington)
If possible, locate these places on the USGS Northwest States map (provided in the
back of this guide). Try a web quest for those you cannot locate.
Chapter 4
32
©2008 UM Regional Learning Project
Tribal Perspectives on American History in the Northwest – Teacher Guide
People
Manuel Quimper
Captain Vancouver
Celiast
Gobaway (Comowol)
Lewis & Clark
French Voyaguers
Ask students to listen for these names in this chapter and pay attention to what
impact each had on the tribes in the area.
Essential Questions (make this a part of the student transcript handout, if you wish)
What were Russians, Japanese, Spanish and English doing on 1.
the Northwest Coast of North America? How did non-Indians
learn to nd food and get around in the Oregon country?
Again, perspectives play a key role in the telling of history. 2.
How might the Spanish, for example, have recounted Maria
Pascua’s story of the Spanish people’s rst encounter with
Pacic Northwest people?
Discuss the Spanish perspective that the villages they 3.
encountered were “abandoned,” versus the reality that the
villages were decimated by European disease, or seasonally
abandoned.
Compare and contrast the perspectives of European contact 4.
with Indian people as “westward expansion” vs. “invasion”
from the east.
Why don’t we see the word “genocide” associated with the 5.
cultural, racial and spiritual decimation of tribal people?
Teacher Directions:
Before your students view this chapter, read aloud the
essential questions and have students think of their initial
response to the questions. Optional– Have them write their
initial responses.
Make individual students or student groups responsible for
becoming the ‘expert’ of the questions you have assigned
them and report back to the class after they have viewed this
chapter.
Student Directions:
Alone, in pairs, or in groups, focus on the essential questions
33
©2008 UM Regional Learning Project
your teacher has assigned you. Think about the questions
during and after your viewing of this chapter.
Prepare a response to your assigned questions and share with
your group or class, as directed by your teacher.
Viewing (9:50 minutes)
i. Teacher transcript
ii. Student transcript, complete with essential questions (at
the beginning), spaces for notes and personal reections.
Post-Viewing Activities (20-30 minutes)
Allow students to nish their notes and reections.1.
Ask students how these stories affect their study of Manifest Destiny.2.
Discuss the role perception has on the recounting of history and its accuracy.3.
If appropriate, ask the question, “How does this chapter relate to what we are 4.
studying now in our social studies class?”
Optional– Discuss, debate, ponder, write on the following statement: “The 5.
United States committed genocide among the tribal people of this continent.”
Optional– Create a graphic in response to one or more of the assigned 6.
questions (this would probably be homework or extra credit).
For Further Study: See Appendix I sections for General Teaching about Pacic
Northwest Tribal People, and Spirituality and Culture.
Also, see the website www.trailtribes.org – See the rst pages listed under
Relationship with the U.S. sections for each tribal group.
“Contact” Painting by George Lagergren.
Chapter 4
34
©2008 UM Regional Learning Project
Tribal Perspectives on American History in the Northwest – Teacher Guide
Transcript
Chapter 4 – First Contact
(9:50 minutes)
Note: Transcript text is an exact rendition of each
interview, without corrections for grammar, etc.
For tribes of the Northwest, rst contact came
to coastal tribes from the sea in the
1790s
to some interior tribes from Lewis &
Clark in 1805-1806
to other interior tribes from David
Thompson’s party in 1808-1811
Pat Courtney Gold – Wasco
When you think about our culture when it’s like
10,000 years old, I think there probably was a
stability for literally thousands of years. A stability
in the language, a stability in how we shed
and processed our food. And the real change,
upheaval came in probably the 1800s with the
meeting of Europeans along the coast and then
the meeting of Americans from the east. And
suddenly there was this tremendous change. I
mean it was just an accelerated change.
Maria Pascua – Makah
When we rst saw the new people that came to
our area, we called them <Makah language>,
and it comes from the word house <Makah
language>. <Makah language> means house
on the water, because we had canoes, many
different sizes of canoes and types of canoes, but
these people lived on their house on the water. So
in our oral traditions we’ve had several different
people groups come by here. We had a shipwreck
from a group of Russians and that was one of
the early contacts. I think that was in the 1800s.
And then another later in the 1830s, a Japanese
shipwreck that came through here. But I’d say
even earlier than that. Probably maybe one of
the earlier contacts would have been the Spanish
because they came here in the 1790s, and they
actually built a fort here in Neah Bay. We had 5
villages and one of the villages the people used to
take down the long house boards and transport
Notes
35
©2008 UM Regional Learning Project
them in between two canoes and move a whole
residence to a shing camp to be closer either
to the halibut banks or the whaling grounds, and
so they would move to another village for that
season, to a seasonal village. And so when the
Spanish came here it looked like an abandoned
village in a way because a lot of the long house
planks were removed, and they just moved in
because it was a good location, of course, where
our permanent village was located. And so that
was one of the rst encounters, they more or less
moved into our space.
Jamie Valadez – Elwah Klallam
Manuel Quimper in 1790 stopped at Freshwater
Bay and canoes came out to greet him and
brought fresh berries and salmon. And then
Captain Vancouver also stopped at the village at
Discovery Bay. But when he stopped, and men
were sent to shore, people had died and they
could tell it was from the diseases.
Julie Cajune – Salish
Indian people from the beginning of invasion
were gracious, were humane, were hospitable,
were generous. What elders and ancestors said
about meeting, you know, these white men
coming through with this large entourage of
people, and it was very curious to me but it was
also familiar to me how Indian people are and
how they treat other people. And I guess the
capacity for their generosity and humanity almost
to a fault and to their detriment and sometimes
to their genocide. And that’s a common story,
that’s a common story that doesn’t get told in US
history.
Marjorie Waheneka – Cayuse/Palouse
Because it was the Indian people that they
interacted with, it was the Indian people that
they got food and horses as transportation. There
was groups that showed them how to make
canoes, how to navigate the rivers, what country
was more erce than the next and they showed
them how to survive out here because they
didn’t have any idea. And that’s what we want
people to know is that the Indians played a very
big part in the Lewis and Clark Expedition.
Notes
Chapter 4 – Transcript
36
©2008 UM Regional Learning Project
Tribal Perspectives on American History in the Northwest – Teacher Guide
Richard Basch – Clatsop/Nehalem
Celiast, my great, great grandmother, was born
in 1801, and was four years old when Lewis
and Clark arrived in 1805. Her father Comowol,
or Gobaway, as our family called him, was the
neighbor to the fort, the one that Lewis and Clark
looked to for trade, for support, and they had a
very important relationship. They arrived at the
wrong time of year. They were in a hard place.
We supported, traded with them, and treated
them as neighbors, sometimes friendly neighbors
sometimes not so friendly neighbors. Our people
found Lewis and Clark to be kind of a pathetic,
motley group. They were…didn’t have much
food, their clothes were just about rotting right off
of them. They didn’t have a lot to trade. We had
been used to trading with ships that had been
coming into the mouth of the Columbia River
and were used to pretty expensive goods, and
Lewis and Clark really didn’t have a lot to offer
by the time they got to us.
Pat Courtney Gold – Wasco
Lewis and Clark saw how the Native people
ate and dressed but they stuck to what they
knew. To me they were very much like arrogant
American tourists. They only spoke their own
language. They would not try different food.
They were used to eating meat, but if they ate
the way the Chinook people ate they would have
gotten all of the minerals their body needed from
sea vegetables and from the salmon. And this
sort of surprised me because they had French
voyaguers traveling with them, and the French,
in the Missouri area, they adopted a lot of the
Native ways. They learned the languages, they
even married, intermarried with the people, but
Lewis and Clark were a different breed.
Richard Basch – Clatsop/Nehalem
They describe us as inquisitive in that we pilfered
a lot, and I think we found them to be conniving.
Pat Courtney Gold – Wasco
When you read the journals they refer to us as
savages. Throughout the journals we’re savages.
And since they think of us as savages and not
Notes
37
©2008 UM Regional Learning Project
human, they could walk into our dwellings just
like they could walk into a bear’s den or some
animal’s den. It never donned on them that we
are humans and we had our way of doing things
as a community.
Bobbie Conner – Cayuse/Nez Perce/
Umatilla
They were talking to and about people that
have had a continuous presence in this place
for millennia. And it hasn’t changed that much.
We’re connected to that point in time not by
years and dates and facts and gures in their
journals, although their journals remind us of
things, but we have a cultural continuity here
on this river that we share that people should
understand has been going on for a lot longer
than when they wrote it down. The stick games
that they try to describe and the bone game
they try to describe, those have been a method
of redistributing wealth for a long time. And to
our way of thinking, we’re still using gaming to
redistribute wealth. The continuity of the tule
mats, the bulrush, the tules are still here. The
animals, most of them are still here. There are
some that have been decimated, the sage grouse,
some species of salmon. The time that they came
through the reasonable estimates are probably
between 16 and 20 million sh came up that
river, home to our tributaries and drainage
systems. And now a million to ve million,
people think is a lot. Abundance was a different
measurement then, our well being was measured
differently then.
Cliff SiJohn – Coeur d’Alene
We had met Lewis & Clark. We met them on the
river south of us. Clark wrote in his journals when
they met with the <native language> people.
What our people say that they were told, “We
have heard about you. We have heard about
how you have come across and met all these
other tribes saying you are their friend, but yet
your men do some terrible things. So you will not
meet the Coeur d’Alenes. We will not let you.”
Yeah, we met Lewis & Clark, but their reputation
preceded them with our chiefs.
Notes
Chapter 4 – Transcript
38
©2008 UM Regional Learning Project
Tribal Perspectives on American History in the Northwest – Teacher Guide
39
©2008 UM Regional Learning Project
Chapter Five:
Advent of the Fur Trade and its Consequences
This chapter discusses the perceptions and encroachment of non-Indians onto Indian
lands before the treaty era.
Suggestion: integrate into the Epidemics or Manifest Destiny units of your US history
class.
Pre-Viewing Activities (20 minutes)
Key Concepts
Ask students to write about how the following might have affected the tribal people
in this area:
fur trade
natural resources
smallpox
diversity of population
Vocabulary
Discuss the idea of labeling people “half breed” or “breed.”
What are the connotations of “breed”? (Animals)
What might be the purpose of labeling someone as “half-
breed”? (Diminishing the individual’s power, identity, and
therefore the ability to resist challenges to power.)
Places
Salish House / Thompson Falls (Montana)
Spokane House / Spokane (Washington)
Fort Nisqually (Washington)
Victoria (British Columbia)
Chimakum Village (Washington)
Ozette Village (Washington)
Puget Sound (Washington)
If possible, locate these places on the USGS Northwest States map (provided in the
back of this guide). Try a web quest for those you cannot locate.
Chapter 5
40
©2008 UM Regional Learning Project
Tribal Perspectives on American History in the Northwest – Teacher Guide
People
Hudson’s Bay Co. Northwest Fur Co.
Samuel Hancock
Ask students to listen for these names in this chapter and pay attention to what
impact each had on the tribes in the area.
Pointed Heart Spokane
Clatsop-Nehelem Makah
Chinook
Locate these tribes on the map of Northwest Tribal Homeland Territories (back of
guide).
Essential Questions (make this a part of the student transcript handout, if you wish)
In what ways did fur trading affect the lives of tribal people?1.
What are the most stunning examples of these effects?2.
Where were fur trade posts located? What inuenced the 3.
decision to establish these posts in these locations? How do
these locations compare to modern settlements?
Teacher Directions:
Before your students view this chapter, read aloud the
essential questions and have students think of their initial
response to the questions. Optional– Have them write
their initial responses.
Make individual students or student groups responsible
for becoming the ‘expert’ of the questions you have
assigned them and report back to the class after they have
viewed this chapter.
Student Directions:
Alone, in pairs, or in groups, focus on the essential questions your
teacher has assigned you. Think about the questions during and after
your viewing of this chapter.
Prepare a response to your assigned questions and share with your
group or class, as directed by your teacher.
41
©2008 UM Regional Learning Project
Viewing (9:50 minutes)
i. Teacher transcript
ii. Student transcript, complete with essential questions (at
the beginning), spaces for notes and personal reections.
Post-Viewing Activities (20-30 minutes)
Allow students to nish their notes and reections.1.
Discuss, debate, ponder, write on the following statement: “The fur trade 2.
should have been stopped when it was discovered that it was decimating the
Indian populations in the Northwest.”
Optional– Create a graphic in response to one or more of the assigned 3.
questions (this would probably be homework or extra credit).
For Further Study: See Appendix I sections for General Teaching about Pacic
Northwest Tribal People, and Spirituality and Culture.
Also see the website www.trailtribes.orgFur Trade pages for each tribal group.
Fort Vancouver of 1845, painting by Richard Schlecht National Park Service, Fort Vancouver
Chapter 5
42
©2008 UM Regional Learning Project
Tribal Perspectives on American History in the Northwest – Teacher Guide
Transcript
Chapter 5 – Advent of the Fur Trade
and its Consequences
(7:20 minutes)
Note: Transcript text is an exact rendition of each
interview, without corrections for grammar, etc.
Ed. note: Soon after Lewis and Clark’s
journey, trading forts were established
throughout tribal lands.
Julie Cajune – Salish
The immediate impact of the success of the Lewis
& Clark expedition, being able to go do this huge
trans-continental trip, talk about all the wealth
and resource along the way, and be able to return
and then the explosion of the fur trade.
Cliff SiJohn – Coeur d’Alene
Hudson Bay Company made contact with us,
some of their trappers, their early trappers.
It wasn’t until 1809 that the Northwest Fur
Company established themselves on what was
called Indian Meadows, our campground. They
also gave us “Pointed Heart,” the name
Pointed Heart. When they established their fur
trading house the rst customers that came in
were Pointed Hearts. Sixteen canoes full of furs
and pelts arrived to trade and traded thereafter
for about a year and a half. And then the Salish
House was opened up in what is now called
Thompson Falls, and we would trade there, go
that far. A few years later the Northwest Fur
Company opened up with the cooperation of
the Pointed Hearts to show them the way down
to the Spokane Falls to meet with the Spokane
Indian people and there the Spokane House was
established.
Around 1830 we were hit with small pox. At
that time it was estimated by the fur company,
Northwest Fur Company, that there was 5,000
Coeur d’Alene’s in that area. We were hit with
smallpox. It devastated the people.
Joe Scovell – Clatsop/Nehalem
People that were coming in, in the 1830s they
Notes
43
©2008 UM Regional Learning Project
saw just bodies, literally piles of bodies of dead
Indians. The American Indians didn’t have the
resistances to European diseases because it
wasn’t a part of their living history.
Jamie Valadez – Elwha Klallam
The rst big fur trading post that the Klallams
had contact with was down at Fort Nisqually.
And then later there was a fort at Victoria and
that had a huge impact right across from where
we’re located. It was during that time with the
fur trading that there was just a lot of lawlessness,
that wild west image. Not only with interactions
between whites and Indians but between tribes.
And it was because of the way that the economy
was changing, people were hunting to sell the
furs. Villages were disappearing either by disease
or because of the war. Like actually the village of
Chimakum, there was such a small population
from diseases and all the changes going on that
there was one war against them, two tribes
attacking Chimakum, and they became extinct.
Maria Pascua – Makah
Back in 1852 or 53, we had a trader that was
here, his name was Samuel Hancock and he had
a trading post. So at that time in his journal he
documents how many hundreds and hundreds
of people died that he was an eyewitness to, and
how many weeks that that epidemic went on
and on. And then several years later there was
another epidemic but on our Southern side at
the village of Ozette. There was a ship that went
by later, I think in 1859, it was called the Good
Cheer and they had an epidemic of small pox
aboard that ship and it was due to the people
on the Good Cheer throwing items overboard
and some of those clothes and blankets had the
disease on it, and I think they were just trying to
get rid of the disease.
Jamie Valadez – Elwha Klallam
There was introduction of alcohol which had
never been here before fur trading and that had
a huge impact on communities.
Julie Cajune – Salish
And then you see this huge, huge impact on
animal communities. By 1830, I was reading
Notes
Chapter 5 – Transcript
44
©2008 UM Regional Learning Project
Tribal Perspectives on American History in the Northwest – Teacher Guide
traders’ report, that the beaver were gone
from Rocky Mountain streams. It was
shocking. It was shocking to me when I think
about ancestors said how just the abundance,
and it’s hard for us to imagine that. I can’t
really imagine it, what kind of abundance
there was. But how, in a very short period of
time, you know, whole animal populations in
regions were just completely gone.
Jamie Valadez – Elwha Klallam
Before they didn’t hunt to sell and so some of
the animals became extinct in our area.
Maria Pascua – Makah
Once they realized that the sea otter fur from
our area was really valued by the Chinese,
they could trade and get furs here and then
hike up the price by quite a huge margin. As
the demand for it became more, I think we
tried to meet the demand, but eventually the
sea otter became over-hunted.
George Lagergren – Chinook
Those men were working for the Hudson
Bay trading and they traveled then from
here down to San Francisco and back. And
that’s the days when the native oysters were
harvested and transported down by little
sailing ships that came into the bay here.
There was no women here except the young
Indian women, and so when they came along,
you see they tied in together with the young
Indian girls, and so that’s what happened to
my grandmother and my great grandmother.
Kathleen Gordon – Cayuse/Walla Walla
My father was born of a union from the
Hudson Bay Company. Those trappers, fur
trappers that came down with the Hudson
Bay Company, some of them married into
the Indian tribes to tribal women. People
that were born of these unions were called
breeds or half-breeds. They weren’t very well
accepted either by the non-Indian community
or the Indian community.
Notes
45
©2008 UM Regional Learning Project
Chapter Six: Missionaries and Early Settlers
This chapter discusses the effects of missionaries and early settlers on the lives of
Northwest tribal people.
Suggestion: integrate into the Manifest Destiny unit of your US history class.
Pre-Viewing Activities (20 minutes)
Key Concepts
Ask students to write about how non-Indian and Indian cultures might have
conicted (everyday customs, traditions, etc.).
conict of cultures
“uncivilized” tribes
introduction of European agricultural practices
Predicting Activity (Key Concepts)
Ask students to dene what qualies as or constitutes 1.
“uncivilized.”
Ask students to list the practices of European agriculture 2.
(clearing land, cultivating, planting, etc).
Vocabulary Terms
Protestant missionaries
Catholic missionaries
Jesuit missionaries
Discuss or list the goals of religious missionaries.
Places
Rathdrum Prairie (Washington)
St. Ignatius (Montana)
Stevensville (Montana)
Lapwai (Idaho)
Neah Bay (Washington)
If possible, locate these places on the USGS Northwest States map (provided in the
back of this guide). Try a web quest for those you cannot locate.
Chapter 6
46
©2008 UM Regional Learning Project
Tribal Perspectives on American History in the Northwest – Teacher Guide
People
Whitmans Circling Raven
Jesuits Bloods
Piegans Blackfeet
Kalispell Pend ‘Oreille
Plateau people
Ask students to listen for the names of people and tribes in this chapter and make
notes about what they learn about them.
Essential Questions (make this a part of the student transcript handout, if you wish)
How did the introduction of agriculture impact Plateau 1.
people?
Why did Christian religion impact tribal people so heavily 2.
during this era?
What was the perspective of non-Indians on traditional male 3.
and female roles in tribal society? Why would they view the
men as “lazy”?
Why is it important to view historical events from multiple 4.
perspectives? How is the Pacic Northwest mission era a
prime example of what can happen when one perspective is
favored over another?
Teacher Directions:
Before your students view this chapter, read aloud the
essential questions and have students think of their initial
response to the questions. Optional– Have them write
their initial responses.
Make individual students or student groups responsible
for becoming the ‘expert’ of the questions you have
assigned them and report back to the class after they have
viewed this chapter.
Student Directions:
Alone, in pairs, or in groups, focus on the essential questions your
teacher has assigned you. Think about the questions during and after
your viewing of this chapter.
Prepare a response to your assigned questions and share with your
group or class, as directed by your teacher.
47
©2008 UM Regional Learning Project
Chapter 6
Viewing (6:50 minutes)
Teacher transcript
Student transcript, complete with essential questions (at the beginning),
spaces for notes and personal reections.
Post-Viewing Activities (20-30 minutes)
Allow students to nish their notes and reections.1.
Ask students how these stories affect their perceptions of present day 2.
missionaries.
Conduct a Socratic Seminar on essential questions. (How to organize a 3.
seminar in your classroom: http://www.middleweb.com/Socrtic.html and
http://studyguide.org/socratic_seminar.html)
Optional– Create a graphic in response to one or more of the assigned 4.
questions (this would probably be homework or extra credit).
For Further Study: See Appendix I sections for General Teaching about Pacic
Northwest Tribal People, and Spirituality and Culture.
Also see the website www.trailtribes.orgMissionaries/Settlements/Emigrants pages
for the tribal groups: Lower Chinook & Clatsop; Umatilla, Walla Walla & Cayuse;
Northern Shoshone & Bannock.
“View of the new mission establishment in 1846 among the Pointed-Hearts” [Coeur d’Alenes], by Jesuit missionary Nicolas Point, 1846
Washington State University Libraries
48
©2008 UM Regional Learning Project
Tribal Perspectives on American History in the Northwest – Teacher Guide
Transcript
Chapter 6 – Missionaries and Early
Settlers (6:50 minutes)
Note: Transcript text is an exact rendition of
each interview, without corrections for grammar,
etc.
Ed. note: First Protestants, then Catholic
Missionaries established missions
throughout the region bringing this new
religion to the tribal inhabitants.
Marjorie Waheneka – Cayuse/Palouse
It was just a conict, you know, a conict of
cultures. They didn’t understand one another.
It’s the Indian custom that the land provides
everything that they had. Well they see Whitman
put these little seeds in the ground, and then
pretty soon these foods start coming up –
watermelons, peas, corn, potatoes. And one time
a couple of the young Indians at the mission
site wanted to see what the watermelons tasted
like and Whitman did do things for protecting
his property, just like putting the arsenic in the
watermelons. And then also Whitman, he had
cattle and he had sheep at the mission, what
he did was he poisoned some meat to get the
wolves and the coyotes to get that instead of the
good stuff. And it just so happened that one time
the Indians see this meat hanging up, and so
then, here they got a hold of it and they got sick.
The Whitmans were killed on November 29th
1847. Their mission was only in existence for
eleven years before all of this came to a head.
Cliff SiJohn – Coeur d’Alene
1840s the missionary arrived, the Jesuit. He was
foretold the coming of this man by a chief named
Circling Raven in the late 1700s. He told the
Indian people, the <native language> people,
that there would be a man coming in a black
robe carrying the cross stick. And that he would
bring us words that would give us two trails to
the heavens: our original way with our <native
language> our old people and this additional
way.
Notes
49
©2008 UM Regional Learning Project
This man arrived on Rathdrum Prairie with some
Flathead Indian people one day. And he was
taken to the big camps and there he established
himself because of two reasons: Number one,
Circling Raven told of his coming and number
two, in order for him to stay he promised guns
to the Coeur d’Alene. And we were battling then
and protecting our area with the encroachers of
the Blood, the Piegan, and the Blackfeet.
Francis Cullooyah – Kalispel
The priests when they rst came into this area
was in about 1842 which is long before the
establishment of our reservation. The people at
that time wanted us to become farmers. I call us
the Kalispel people or the Pend d’Oreille people
as one of the “uncivilized tribes” because we
never were meant to be farmers, I don’t think.
We were put in this place and the growing
season was short and the winters very severe.
The Kalispel, Pend d’ Oreille people adapted
themselves pretty well to Catholicism and they
followed. And I don’t mean to be disrespectful to
the Catholic Church, but when someone comes
in and tells you that you’re going to spend the
rest of your time in hell, and if you don’t do
this and if you don’t do that. And when they
were doing that is when they wanted to move
the St. Ignatius mission, the very rst St. Ignatius
mission, it was established here on the Kalispel.
The church was moved to which is now St.
Ignatius, Montana. And I know that at one point
or another when they were wanting to move,
they wanted all the Indian people to move with
it. And to me that sounds a little shy.
Rob Collier – Nez Perce
I think it was really hard for the Plateau people
to learn farming when the missionaries rst came
in, both down here at Stevensville and over
at Lapwai, because the Plateau people, only
women could put their hands in the earth. Men
couldn’t put their hands in the earth and farm,
we couldn’t even dig roots because men had
blood on their hands because we’re hunters and
warriors, takers of life. But the women are givers
of life and they’re pure so they can put their
hands in the earth. And that’s a concept that
Notes
Chapter 6 – Transcript
50
©2008 UM Regional Learning Project
Tribal Perspectives on American History in the Northwest – Teacher Guide
was really hard for Plateau people to come to
grips with because it had been so ingrained for
thousands of years that men don’t do that.
First white settlers that came out thought, “Oh,
these guys are really lazy. They’re really lazy.”
The women are out there digging those roots
and bending over and working hard all the time,
but they didn’t realize the cultural implication of
a man putting his hands into the earth.
Cliff SiJohn – Coeur d’Alene
Many of the Coeur d’Alenes, mostly the southern
group, became excellent farmers. They accepted
this change immediately. They embraced the
Jesuit and his words. And there were those who
refused. And those who refused were punished
by the missionary. It was like the missionary did
not want us to have two ways to the heavens. It
was this one is no good, this one is the only one.
Maria Pascua – Makah
One of the oral histories about the rst
missionaries, one of the rst stories that was
told and translated here was about Noah and
the ood, and how it rained for 40 days and
40 nights. And if you live in Neah Bay, it can
do that in the winter 40 days and 40 nights and
then some. So I think hearing that story for a rst
one, they didn’t nd it out of the ordinary.
Notes
51
©2008 UM Regional Learning Project
Chapter Seven: The Treaties
This chapter explores the multiple interpretations of treaty negotiations and meaning.
Suggestion: integrate into the US Constitution or Manifest Destiny units of your US
history class.
Pre-Viewing Activities (20 minutes)
Key Concepts
Indian grapevine
misinformation through translation and interpretation (treaty councils)
Predicting Activity (Key Concepts)
Ask students to play a game of “Electricity” or “Phone Line,” where one
student whispers a message to another, and the message is repeated
throughout the class. The end meaning is often very different than the
original message.
How does this game exemplify the problems inherent in translating 1.
into other languages?
How might have these communication problems affected Northwest 2.
tribal treaty negotiations and entering into treaties in the rst place?
Vocabulary
treaty treaty rights
ratify Great White Father
Alone, in pairs, or in groups, have students develop a working 1.
denition for each vocabulary word.
Optional– Have students report after viewing how their vocabulary 2.
word was used in the chapter they viewed.
Places
Washington locations:
Tansy Point Medicine Creek
Point No Point Port Gamble
Ozette Port Townsend
Wada Island (location of Klallam Village of Kah Tai)
Tatoosh Island Quinault Indian Reservation
Walla Walla
Umatilla Reservation (OR), Warm Springs Reservation (OR), Council Grove (near
Missoula, Montana); Mullan Road (from Ft. Walla Walla, Wa., to Ft. Benton, Mt.)
Listen for these place names as you view the lm, and make notes about their
importance in this chapter about treaties.
Chapter 7
52
©2008 UM Regional Learning Project
Tribal Perspectives on American History in the Northwest – Teacher Guide
People
Anson Dart
Isaac I. Stevens
Joel Palmer
Chief Chetzemoka
Chimakum
Chief Victor
Chief Charlo
James Gareld
Captain Mullan
Clatsops
Nehelems
Tillamooks
Chinooks
K’lallams
Colvilles
Ask students to listen for the names of people listed above in this chapter, and pay
attention to what role they played in treaty-making.
Locate the names of tribes on the map of Northwest Tribal Homeland Territories
(back of guide).
Essential Questions (make this a part of the student transcript handout, if you wish)
How did the “Indian grapevine” affect treaty-making?1.
There is no written evidence to support the story of bombing the 2.
K’lallam village to force agreement during the treaty negotiations.
Does this mean that it didn’t really happen? Why might this
bombing be unrecorded?
Cliff Sijohn recounts that though they had signed treaties to protect 3.
what land and rights they had left, Congress had already planned
to build a military road through the middle of Coeur d’Alene
country. What might this say about the United States’ views of the
treaty agreement into which they were entering? How might this set
the stage for conict and war?
Put yourself in the shoes of the Indian people signing the Anson Dart 4.
treaties in 1851. Would you expect the other side to keep its part
of the agreement? Do you think they understood the ratication
process? Should someone from the government have reported back
to them when the Senate failed to ratify? How willing would you be
to make treaties with the whites and trust they would be honored?
Was Issac Stevens honest with the tribes about why the United 5.
States wanted to enter into these treaty agreements? What were the
reasons for entering these treaties?
Skokomish
Ozettes
Makahs
Quinaults
Quilliuts
Cowlitz
Umatillas
Walla Wallas
Yakamas
Cayuse
Kootenai
K’sanka
Coeur d’Alene
Palouse
Nez Perce
53
©2008 UM Regional Learning Project
Viewing (27:00 minutes)
Teacher transcript
Student transcript, complete with essential questions (at the beginning),
spaces for notes and personal reections.
Post-Viewing Activities (20 - 30 minutes)
Allow students to nish their notes and reections.1.
Divide students into four groups and have each group respond to essential 2.
questios 1-3 and 5. Share responses with the class.
Discuss and debate essential question 4.3.
You’ve heard the stories of the treaty making era from the perspective of the 4.
native tribes involved. Have students break up into groups, each tell what s/
he saw and heard; come up with the agreed upon version, then write a short
song about it.
Optional– Create a graphic in response to one or more of the assigned 5.
questions (this would probably be homework or extra credit).
For Further Study: See Appendix I section for Treaties and Tribal Sovereignty.
Also see the website www.trailtribes.orgMaking Treaties pages for
the tribal groups.
“Arrival of the Nez Perce Indians at Walla Walla Treaty, May 1855” from watercolor by Gustavus Sohon.
Washington State Historical Society, Tacoma
Chapter 7
54
©2008 UM Regional Learning Project
Tribal Perspectives on American History in the Northwest – Teacher Guide
1854 Lambert, John. “Map of Washington Territory showing the Indian Nations and Tribes”. Washington State Historical Society, Tacoma.
55
©2008 UM Regional Learning Project
Transcript
Chapter 7 – The Treaties
(27:00 minutes)
Note: Transcript text is an exact rendition of
each interview, without corrections for grammar,
etc.
With the opening of the Oregon Trail
in the 1840s and the discovery of gold
in California in 1848, the population of
emigrants exploded.
The territories of Oregon and Washington
were established and plans were made
to obtain land from the Indians, reserving
areas for their exclusive use.
First Chinook Treaties negotiated – 1851
Gary Johnson – Chinook
The rst of the treaties, they were called the
Anson-Dart Treaties, and there were a whole
series of them written with the different tribes.
Joe Scovell – Clatsop/Nehalem
It provided the signers, the Clatsops, the
Nehalems, and also the Tillamooks in general,
they could select a certain site for hunting and
shing. That treaty was not fullled. The chiefs
and headmen of the tribes signing felt that they
had a deal with the United States government
and that the United States government would
honor their rights and, and at the same time, the
people, the immigrants that wanted to come in
and take over the land would be given the land.
Richard Basch – Clatsop/Nehalem
We had a treaty that was called the Tansy Point
Treaty where the Clatsop, the Chinooks, all the
different tribes of the Chinook nation signed
treaties at Tansy Point, ceding our territory.
Dened in those treaties were little reservations
in what is now Clatsop county, Pacic county.
And the non-Indians moved in, they started
farming, shing, cutting down the timber, but
that document which was signed by us went
Notes
Chapter 7 – Transcript
56
©2008 UM Regional Learning Project
Tribal Perspectives on American History in the Northwest – Teacher Guide
to Washington and was never signed by the
President, was never ratied by Congress. That
document that we thought was going to be the
terms of agreement and was going to be our
future, turned out to be worthless. We ended
up being lost in our own country. Many of us
had to move away from there, we were pushed
out.
Isaac I. Stevens and Joel Palmer, Governors
of Washington and Oregon respectfully,
negotiated a series of treaties with many of the
tribes in the area in 1854 & 1855.
Otis Halfmoon – Nez Perce
There was a man by the name Governor Isaac
I. Stevens who was sent over here by the Great
White Father here to make treaties with the
tribes knowing that there was going to be a
railroad put through the area, and so he wanted
the tribes put into certain areas.
Treaties of 1854-1855
Point No Point Treaty – January 26, 1855
Jamie Valadez – Elwha Klallam
In 1855 Governor Stevens was traveling around
western Washington with a team to have these
treaties signed. And so he would try to gather
multiple tribes together to sign under one treaty,
and was successful.
The rst one was Medicine Creek and the
second one was Point No Point and they met
over by the Port Gamble area. There they
brought together the Skokomish, the Klallams
and the Chimakum. They are all separate,
different tribes, and they were successful in
signing the treaty around January 26, so it was
during the winter. They brought all the sub
chiefs together and they appointed one main
chief from the Port Townsend Klallam village of
Kah Tai, his name was Chetzemoka. Governor
Stevens met with the tribal chiefs and explained
each article of the treaty, one by one, with an
interpreter, and they also used the Chinook
jargon, and that night they talked amongst
themselves about it, and at rst they did not
want to sign. Many of the sub chiefs spoke out
Notes
57
©2008 UM Regional Learning Project
to say that they wanted to make sure they had
their shing and hunting grounds, because they
moved around to sh and hunt, they didn’t stay
in one place, and gathering. And so that was
very important that that was an article. Then that
night the village was bombed. There was a ship
out in the harbor and a lot of people were killed.
That bombing had to do with threatening the
chiefs to sign the treaty for one, but it also had
to do with some other incident that happened
before, like a retaliation.
So the next morning when they were to meet
with Governor Stevens again, the sub-chiefs
came with white ags and gave up and signed.
One of the stipulations was that all of the
Klallams, Chimakum would go and live on the
Skokomish reservation. And there was one
attempt at moving a village and it was the village
at Port Townsend, Kah Tai. They gathered up all
the people that lived there and their canoes and
tied them behind a steamboat, canoe to canoe,
so it’s a long chain, all their belongings they
could gather in the time they had, and then they
saw their houses, their village being burned as
they were leaving.
Treaty of Neah Bay, January 31, 1855
Maria Pascua – Makah
When they came our population was so
depleted compared to what it was. Just two to
three years prior to the signing of the treaty one
village was completely wiped out by smallpox
other than a mother and a son that were left
behind, and being outgunned and outmanned
and everything. And also the “Indian grapevine”
or the way that native people travel about and
hear what’s going on in the world, there was a
big network like that. And so our people were
expecting the treaty party is what I was told,
and when they came they set up a meeting and
some of our head people that were here went
out by canoe to their schooner and they had a
discussion the night before the treaty signing and
they wanted to have other tribes come to Neah
Bay and also our village of Ozette, which was
furthest away, our people told them it would
take another day before the Ozettes could come
Notes
Chapter 7 – Transcript
58
©2008 UM Regional Learning Project
Tribal Perspectives on American History in the Northwest – Teacher Guide
and of course the treaty party wanted things
done faster than that, but that’s the reality of the
times, everyone had to come by canoe or boat.
The translation was a three-way translation. The
people spoke English, the government people,
and then there was a man who interpreted that
into Chinook jargon, which is a limited trade
language vocabulary that most of the tribes
here used as well as the traders, but it doesn’t
convey all of the legal implications of the treaty
of course. But to the best of their ability I think
they tried to get across some of the points
in the treaty and I also think a lot was lost in
translation.
Edward Claplanhoo – Makah
The main thing he would tell me, my dad would
tell me is that you don’t look at the treaty itself,
you look at the minutes of the treaty. And if
you can digest the minutes of the treaty you’ll
know what all of the wording that’s in the treaty
means. So I’ve maintained that all my life that if
you’re going to understand our treaty you better
get the minutes so you can understand what
our forefathers went through to get that, and
the meanings that they were looking for as they
were negotiating.
Maria Pascua – Makah
In the minutes we say that they want our
original locations and hunting and shing
places and we had villages on Wada Island and
Tatoosh Island. And yet in the actual treaty itself
it says that we will cede our islands. But it was
not made clear in the negotiations, and so we
didn’t get our islands back until 1980, 1980s.
Janine Bowechop – Makah
So our reservation is now just about 38 square
miles, but previously of course we had control
of a much bigger area of land and even more
importantly than our control of that land would
be access to and control of the ocean resources.
So during the treaty negotiations with the
Federal Government prior to 1855, our people
made it very clear that we needed to access the
ocean to continue our way of life.
Notes
59
©2008 UM Regional Learning Project
So the treaty signers, the treaty negotiators,
made sure that we had access to our traditional
shing and hunting grounds on the water
because of course sea mammals and sh and
shell sh have always been really important to
us and really still are. So we agreed to take a
pretty small piece of land to live on, but insisted
on maintaining access to a pretty large body of
water.
Chehalis River Treaty & Treaty of Olympia
February 24-27, 1855
Gary Johnson – Chinook
The early treaties, they rst wanted to push
or send all the Indian people to eastern
Washington, which is a totally different climate,
you know, none of the rivers or the water,
and asking people to leave their ancestors and
their villages, and people wouldn’t go, didn’t
want to go. So there was a treaty, the Chehalis
River Treaty in 1855. They asked people to go
up north and they didn’t specify an area, but
it turned out to be near the Quinault Indian
Reservation. Multiple tribes were there and none
of them would agree to the terms. Governor
Isaac Stevens, you know, left the treaty grounds
and everyone went home without a treaty
signed.
And that followed with the following year, what
was called the Treaty of Olympia, which was
signed only with the Quinault and Quileute
tribes, and none of the other lower river tribes,
tribes down here, signed that. By presidential
proclamation, that reservation was expanded
from 10,000 acres to 220,000, and the
Chinooks, and the Cowlitz, and Chehalis, and
Shoalwater, many other tribes were then given
land on the expanded reservation.
Walla Walla Treaty Council, June 9, 1855
Otis Halfmoon – Nez Perce
Isaac I. Stevens came to Walla Walla country to
meet with the Umatillas, Walla Wallas, Cayuse,
Yakamas, Palouse, and Nez Perce. All of the
tribes gathered there. It was a great gathering
Notes
Chapter 7 – Transcript
60
©2008 UM Regional Learning Project
Tribal Perspectives on American History in the Northwest – Teacher Guide
there in Walla Walla what the Nez Perce call
<Nez Perce >. <Nez Perce> is a name for
the Walla Walla country. And we…the Nez
Perce came in force. It was said it was marked
through history there by Sohon who was with
Isaac I. Stevens. The Nez Perce came back
and rode down the warriors and they were
singing their songs, and they came down and
they were war whooping and yelling around.
It must have been quite a sight to behold. But
again once they sat down and going through
the translations, and you had to go through a
bunch of translators and I believe much of that
was lost.
Marjorie Waheneka – Cayuse/Palouse
One of the things about the treaty council that
people don’t know, is that when Stevens was
making that he was only going to establish two
reservations, the Yakama and the Nez Perce.
But it was our leaders here on the Umatilla
that fought and said, “No. We don’t want to
be that far removed from our homeland.” And
so they fought and they negotiated for a third
reservation, which became the Umatilla.
Armand Minthorn – Cayuse/Nez Perce
The tribes here, Umatilla, Walla Walla, and
Cayuse, signed a treaty in 1855 with the
Federal Government. When we signed that
treaty we gave away 6.4 million acres, but we
retained our right to gather, hunt and sh.
When the treaty signers signed that treaty
they had a foresight for future generations
to continue with the way of life, which is
dependent on those resources, dependent on
a traditional way of life. To continue to hunt,
sh, gather roots and berries and medicines.
Otis Halfmoon – Nez Perce
I remember reading there were one of the, I
believe he was Cayuse, and he got up and he
said what was on everyone’s mind. He got up
and he stood there before the council and he
said, “Does the Earth know what is happening
to it? Does the Earth even know that these
lines are being drawn across it? Does the earth
Notes
Signature page from the 1855 treaty with the Umatilla, Walla Walla,
and Cayuse tribes. Tomastslikt Cultural Institute
61
©2008 UM Regional Learning Project
know it, does it realize these things? Who is
going to speak for the Earth?”
Those words are very, very strong, not only
for all the tribes but for everyone that is across
this land here today. We all are going to have
to speak for the earth now as far as what is
happening to it, the exploitation that’s taken
place. It’s enormous. The forests are being
destroyed, our atmosphere is being changed.
We all have to speak for the earth. We have
to think back to that time period of 1855 the
wisdom of that man.
Lee Bourgeau – Nez Perce
The attitude is, with treaties, is that the Federal
Government gave the Nez Perce tribe in the
treaty of 18[5]5. They didn’t give us anything.
They didn’t give us anything, they took. They
took from us, a lot.
And what we did as a people is we reserved,
through those treaties, some rights. You know,
hunting and shing and gathering. We reserved
those rights. And I just can never say it enough,
I am so thankful for the wisdom of our elders
in negotiating our treaties, because I know that
there are other tribes that are not as fortunate as
us.
The Dalles Treaty Council, June 25, 1855
Pat Courtney Gold – Wasco
We signed a treaty here in the Dalles and
we gave up a lot of our land and a lot of our
shing rights and we were pretty much forced,
we didn’t have a say, but we were pretty
much forced to move to the Warm Springs
Reservation.
Our ancestors started moving in the late 1880s.
And during that move I think a lot happened
to the ancestors when they moved. First of all
it was physically a real shock. You just have to
imagine what it would be like for you to be
forcefully moved out of your house and your
community into an area that you didn’t know
very well. And we were known for our trade, for
our salmon shing, the food was always with us.
Notes
Chapter 7 – Transcript
62
©2008 UM Regional Learning Project
Tribal Perspectives on American History in the Northwest – Teacher Guide
We were moved, you know, south to a semi-
arid area, totally isolated, there were no people
to trade with. And I think what happened was
the ancestors were focusing on just surviving.
The Hellgate Treaty Council, July 16,
1855
Vernon Finley – Kootenai
The band that lived in this area and that signed
the treaty here at Council Grove is the K’sanka
band, which was the band that lived in the area
that is referred to today as Montana.
And as the Europeans began to move in and
the ways of life changed and the buffalo were
wiped out, the people, as happened with all
tribes, became less dependent upon the natural
resources to live and more dependent upon
the trade goods. And with that came poverty
when those things weren’t available. And
it progressively got worse and worse, and it
became more and more difcult for people just
to stay alive.
And by the time 1855 rolled around, when
Governor Stevens right here on this ground
wanted to meet with the different tribes to sign
treaties with them, the Kootenais were in a
pretty bad way. They were hungry and starving
and it was hard times.
And so when the chief came down to meet
with Governor Stevens, one of the things he
had in mind was to be able to stop the wars,
stop the killing and for the <Ak-smuk-nik> to
still be able to go throughout the places they’ve
always gone and to gather the foods and the
medicines and everything they’ve always done
before.
Julie Cajune – Salish
The tribal leaders at that time, you know,
believed that language that said, “This land is
set aside for the exclusive use and benet of
these Indian people,” and they believed that
was forever.
Notes
63
©2008 UM Regional Learning Project
Vernon Finley – Kootenai
The idea of owning the land, if you can think
about the world view, about the perspective
that took place and how we as human beings,
what our place is in all of creation, and where
us as an individual, what our place is in all of
this, to have the gall or the audacity to assume
that we could own all the rest of this, it’s some
of our possessions. That was a foreign concept.
It was just something that couldn’t be grasped.
But from the Western perspective owning the
land is everything. You know, they assumed
that, “Well if this tribe is camping here, in
the fall they’re camping somewhere else, and
in the winter they’re camping somewhere
else, they must not own this land so we can
claim it and say it’s ours.” Well, that idea of
property ownership was one of the largest
misunderstandings among the two worldviews.
And, so when Governor Stevens told the
Kootenais, “You have to give up all of your
aboriginal territory, everywhere where you’ve
gone before, you don’t own that anymore.
What you will own will reserve a smaller part of
it, up here. And we’ll call it the reservation and
that will be yours. That will be preserved, you
will own that part.”
The idea was strange to the Kootenai chief, and
so what he said was, “Okay. You can say that
you own all of this. You can go ahead and say
that if we can always go where we’ve always
gone, always collect the foods we’ve always
collected, always done the things we’ve always
done, everywhere we’ve gone and done that in
the past.”
You know, he was trying to gure out a way
we can both meet our needs here. You can go
ahead and say you own the land but this earth
has been here for thousands and thousands
of generations and you’re, you know, in a few
short years, you’re not even going to exist. But
you can say the idea that you would own a
piece of it is absurd, but if you want to say that
you own it, go ahead and say that you own it
as long as we can do what we do. You do what
you want to do, we do what we want to do.
Notes
Chapter 7 – Transcript
64
©2008 UM Regional Learning Project
Tribal Perspectives on American History in the Northwest – Teacher Guide
And as long as those things are in agreement
and you stop killing us, then this can work.
Julie Cajune – Salish
In the Hellgate Treaty there is a provision for
the survey of another reservation because
Victor, who was a principle leader at that
time, had no intention of moving from the
Bitterroot Valley. You know, he recognized
this was the Pend d’Oreille, the Upper Pend
d’Oreille were occupying this area. And yes,
we’re relatives, but that he had no intention
of leaving the Bitterroot. And so the survey
of the Bitterroot was supposed to be done. It
was promised and guaranteed in the Hellgate
Treaty but it was never really done.
And so Victor died, I believe in 1872, and
so then his son, who people are more
familiar with, and referred to as Chief Charlo,
became the principle leader of the Bitterroot
Salish. He stayed. He knew his father never
intended to leave. And that was a solemn
obligation. And when James Gareld was
sent out to convince him to move, you know,
he had no intention and he was unwilling.
And then Gareld produced a document in
Washington D.C. that supposedly had his
mark on it as if he said, “Okay. I’ll gather
everybody together and we’ll move now.”
And he was very bitter, and to the day he
died said he never agreed to leave. And they
stayed in the Bitterroot until 1891. And I
think poverty and pressure from the settlers
forced them. I guess they were doing very
poorly. And that’s a very sad, very sad…I
think he died probably of a broken heart
having to move and then having to see
allotment, you know. And then I think he
died the year they opened the reservation up
to homesteading in 1910.
You know, after ceding over 22 million acres
and the reservation was allotted in 1904,
and then unallotted lands were declared
surplus and opened to white homesteaders
in 1910, we lost over 60 percent of this small
sanctuary of land base, and have been buying
it back at a premium for decades. And so we
Notes
65
©2008 UM Regional Learning Project
have now recovered over 300,000 acres of land
that was lost. That’s a remarkable story.
Spokane Treaty Council,
December 5, 1855
This council failed to accomplish the goal
of establishing one additional reservation
for the Spokane, Colville and Coeur
d’Alene.
Felix Aripa – Coeur d’Alene
They didn’t want to be told what to do I guess.
Some of the generals wanted to put the Coeur
d’Alenes into the Colvilles. They didn’t want
that. Why leave up here and go over there,
we couldn’t make a living. Here we know
how to make a living. We have our lakes, our
mountains. We have everything. We know how
to live here.
Cliff SiJohn – Coeur d’Alene
Up through the 50s, more and more people
started drifting in here and drifting in here.
And the army met with the Coeur d’Alenes
and promised that they would help the Coeur
d’Alenes and keep these people out of their
lands.
The treaty that was made with the Yakamas,
and the Umatilla, and the Cayuse and the Walla
Walla, and part of the Nez Perce, was made in
’55. Right after that there was a treaty supposed
to be made with the Coeur d’Alenes to name
the areas that we did not want white people to
come into.
Little did we know, that even at that time when
they were promising to help keep the settlers
out of our area, they were already appropriating
in Congress money to build a road right through
the middle of our country...and to open up this
country with this military road they called the
Mullan Road.
Notes
Chapter 7 – Transcript
66
©2008 UM Regional Learning Project
Tribal Perspectives on American History in the Northwest – Teacher Guide
Nez Perce (Nee-me-poo) National Historic Trail National Park Service
67
©2008 UM Regional Learning Project
Chapter Eight:
Treaty Aftermath - The Nez Perce Story
This chapter explores the immediate ramications of treaty-making in the Northwest.
Suggestion: integrate into the US Constitution and Manifest Destiny units of your US
history class and your state history class.
Pre-Viewing Activities (20 minutes)
Key Concepts
demise of buffalo herds
Nez Perce ight of 1877
discovery of gold
miners and homesteaders
shrinking reservation
Indian concept of land as “the bones of their ancestors”
Predicting Activity (Key Concepts)
Ask students to write about how reservations might ‘shrink.’1.
Create a drawing entitled “The Land is the Bones of Their 2.
Ancestors.”
Vocabulary
exile
fractionalized
Ask students to look up the terms and check for understanding.
Places
Nez Perce Reservation (Idaho)
Wallowa Valley (Oregon)
Bear Paw Battleeld (Montana)
Indian Territory (Oklahoma)
Find the rst two locations on the USGS Northwest States map provied in back
pocket of this guide.
Optional– For the second two locations, do a webquest to nd the areas. Where
are they in relation to the rst two places listed?
Chapter 8
68
©2008 UM Regional Learning Project
Tribal Perspectives on American History in the Northwest – Teacher Guide
People
Chief Joseph Looking Glass
Whte Bird Old Joseph
Ask students to listen for these names in this chapter and pay attention to what tribe
they belong to, and what else they learn about each of these people.
Essential Questions (make this a part of the student transcript handout, if you wish)
Create a scenario that puts you in the shoes of the Nez Perce 1.
after the treaty they signed in 1855. What would be your
understanding of the treaty?
Optional– Has the U.S. Government honored the treaties?2.
Viewing (5:25 minutes)
Teacher transcript
Student transcript, complete with essential questions (at the beginning),
spaces for notes and personal reections.
Post-Viewing Activities (20-30 minutes)
Allow students to nish their notes and reections.1.
In groups or individually, have students express their responses to essential 2.
question 1.
Optional– Research the “Indian War of 1856” on the Columbia Plateau.3.
Optional– In researching the War of 1877, nd as many differing accounts as 4.
possible, compare language used, and draw conclusions about the validity of
each.
Ask students to write about how reservations might “shrink.”5.
Create a drawing entitled “The Land is the Bones of Their Ancestors”.6.
For Further Study: See Appendix I sections for General Teaching about Pacic
Northwest Tribal People.
Also see the website www.trailtribes.orgShrinking Reservations pages for
each of the tribal groups.
69
©2008 UM Regional Learning Project
Transcript
Chapter 8 – Treaty Aftermath; The
Nez Perce Story (5:25 minutes)
Note: Transcript text is an exact rendition of
each interview, without corrections for grammar,
etc.
End of the buffalo
Miners and Homesteaders
Shrinking Reservation
Flight of 1877
Rob Collier – Nez Perce
The buffalo, when it became extinct, that
was within what, three years? They went
from thousands and thousands in big, huge
herds to none - to absolutely none. And how
disheartening it must have been for the Indian
people to go out on the plains and see rotting
carcasses. I mean they didn’t even take the meat.
They take the skins or even just shot them for
sport and leave them there to rot.
So it must have been very hard culturally, and
that was what the men did at that time. They
were hunters. They were the hunters. And when
you don’t have anything to hunt anymore, that’s
like being red from your job.
Otis Halfmoon – Nez Perce
In 1855 the land that was set aside to our
people, a lot of things happened to that piece
of ground and it’s really a sad story as far as you
look at our land base today. The land when
they came by they told us that no white man
would be allowed to come on our reservation
without our endorsement or authorization or our
blessing.
In 1860 they discovered gold, discovered gold
on our reservation and white people go crazy
over gold. Next thing you know you got gold
miners coming in every which way to our
reservation. But they didn’t leave. They started
homesteading around the area and squatting on
the land. The government found themselves in
the position now what are we going to do, we
have got all these Anglo people all over the Nez
Notes
Chapter 8 – Transcript
70
©2008 UM Regional Learning Project
Tribal Perspectives on American History in the Northwest – Teacher Guide
Perce reservation which we told them we wasn’t
going to allow, and all of sudden well what are
we going to do? Well, make another treaty.
In 1863 another treaty was made and it divided
the land even smaller. And it also divided
many of the Nez Perce people. It divided us
completely because some of them, they would
not sign it, and some of the leaders did sign it.
The ones that signed this piece of treaty were
ones that were within those boundaries and in
fact it’s pretty much the present day boundary
of what we have today, and they were Christian
leaders.
The ones outside the reservation did not sign
it, people like Joseph, Looking Glass, White
Bird, <Nez Perce > and many others that were
outside the boundary area. And they wouldn’t
sign it, and as far as they were concerned as far
as tribal government if they didn’t agree with it,
they didn’t have to abide by it.
And the soldiers or the treaty commissioners
says, “The majority of the Nez Perce signed it, so
therefore you all have to abide by it.” That was
a different form of law as far as the Nez Perce
were concerned. And thus the war of 1877.
Rob Collier – Nez Perce
At the battle of Bear Paw when <Native
language>, Chief Joseph, surrendered, the
people were taken to Indian Territory in
Oklahoma and it was a real bad experience and
that’s were my grandpa was born. Grandpa he
wouldn’t, he wouldn’t talk about it, he would
not.
Lee Bourgeau – Nez Perce
Being a descendent of what everybody calls the
Chief Joseph band, even though it was several
bands that were in the Flight of 1877. I have
great grandfathers who were in that Flight and a
part of that. During the ight there was a lot of
death and I can remember mother talking about
the elders and how distressing it was that they
had to bury our people in such shallow graves
to keep going. And now to listen to the elders
talk about how sacred that land is. All of that
Notes
71
©2008 UM Regional Learning Project
Chapter 8 – Transcript
land along that whole Flight is sacred because
everywhere there, there’s bodies of our people.
And when I think about the reasons why our
people fought for the land and the Flight of 1877,
why they didn’t want to give up the Wallowa
Valley, why they didn’t want to give up the
Salmon River area, all of those places that were so
important to our people. There is one thing that’s
written in books, but my mother said is really true
that Joseph’s father, Old Joseph, told him not
to ever sell the bones of your mother and your
father.
Bobbie Conner – Cayuse/Nez Perce/Umatilla
And by 1871 when Old Joseph dies, we’re already
fractionalized and split amongst our relatives
and our friends by Christianity, by treaties, by
government intervention, by alcohol, by trappers
and traders. The division and fractionalization
has already become part of a way of life. And
by 1877, when they go into exile, it is a mere
distance in time from when the expedition came
through, and for us it’s only a couple generations
ago that that exile began.
Notes
72
©2008 UM Regional Learning Project
Tribal Perspectives on American History in the Northwest – Teacher Guide
73
©2008 UM Regional Learning Project
Chapter Nine: Reections
This chapter addresses Indian survival after Manifest Destiny and U.S. attempts at
assimilation.
Suggestion: integrate materials introduced here into the Manifest Destiny unit of your US
history and state history class.
Pre-Viewing Activities (20 minutes)
Key Concepts
“Kill the Indian, Save the Child” – US Government policy and assimilation
the existence of Indian people “from time immemorial”
culture as a universe
covenant with the Creator vs. modern jurisdictions
Predicting Activity (Key Concepts)
Explore the implications of the “Kill the Indian, save the child” 1.
philosophy of the U.S. government after the treaty making era.
Dene “time immemorial.” What does this mean regarding the 2.
existence of tribal people on this continent?
What might “culture as a universe” mean?3.
Vocabulary
perseverance covenant
generation reections
termination perseverance
heritage
Ask students to dene the terms and pay attention to how they are used throughout
the chapter.
Essential Questions
Ask the students to pay attention to the ideology presented in this chapter, that
tribes feel a deep responsibility to maintain lifeways and the land that sustains
those lifeways.
Bobbie Conner states that their “Covenant with the Creator...1.
transcends modern jurisdictions.” What is she expressing in
this statement?
Chapter 9
74
©2008 UM Regional Learning Project
Tribal Perspectives on American History in the Northwest – Teacher Guide
Swans in moonlight Ken Furrow photograph
Viewing (3:55 minutes)
Teacher transcript
Student transcript, complete with essential questions (at the beginning),
spaces for notes and personal reections.
Post-Viewing Activities (20-30 minutes)
Allow students to nish their notes and reections.1.
Discuss or conduct a Socratic Seminar on the following question: “What does 2.
the ability to tell your own history accomplish? For whom?”
Explore the implication of the “Kill the Indian, save the child” philosophy of 3.
the U.S. government after the treaty making era.
Dene “time immemorial.” What does this mean regarding the existence of 4.
tribal people on this continent?
What might “culture as a universe” mean? 5.
For further study see the website www.trailtribes.org
75
©2008 UM Regional Learning Project
Transcript
Chapter 9 – Reections (3:55 minutes)
Note: Transcript text is an exact rendition
of each interview, without corrections for
grammar, etc.
Gary Johnson – Chinook
It’s also important too, that the story is told
about what happened to the land, how people
in my father’s generation, my grandmother’s
generation, were taken and sent to Indian
schools. And the government policy was clearly
stated, “Kill the Indian, save the child”.
And it was really tough times for people to live
through, and to try to maintain their culture and
try to maintain their family connections.
Kathleen Gordon – Cayuse/Walla Walla
Our heritage is from a very, very strong people.
I’m very grateful to still be here as a human
being after all our people were really put
through, and I have a deep feeling of gratitude
for the strength of our people to be able to
withstand what they had to withstand.
Stan Bluff – Kalispel
We are unique people. We have a story and we
have a tradition. And I think this to me is the
most important thing - to know who we are and
know our history. To know that we have existed
here from time immemorial, and that we are
going to maintain, we are going to survive.
And we’ve survived a lot. The terminations, the
treaty days, reservation days, we’ve survived
them. We’re still here. The perseverance that
our elders, our leaders, have had, the foresight
they had, is why we are here today.
Edward Claplanhoo – Makah
So I have to admire what our forefathers left us
and they left us a lot. We look at our treaty and
the things they left in our treaty you have to
marvel at.
Notes
Chapter 9 – Transcript
76
©2008 UM Regional Learning Project
Tribal Perspectives on American History in the Northwest – Teacher Guide
Gary Johnson – Chinook
And seeing that the old ways of protecting the
resources and living closely with, on the water,
and on the land, seeing the importance of that
is why we work so hard today to maintain the
tribe. Our culture is the whole universe and
we need to build it and maintain it.
Marjorie Waheneka – Cayuse/Palouse
A lot of our things are disappearing today. But
we still have a strong belief, that as long as we
take care of the land, as long as we practice
the treaty, have that treaty piece of paper in
our hand, that’s our legal documentation.
And that gives us the right to use accustomed
areas. And something that our elders instilled
in us, and it’s up to us today to practice that
and also tell our younger people, our children,
our grandchildren, this is how we’re going to
survive.
Bobbie Conner – Cayuse/Nez Perce/
Umatilla
And our covenant with the creator, for giving
us this place to live and for the animals and
the plants here agreeing to sustain us, if we
would protect them, transcends all of those
modern jurisdictions.
Clean air, clean water, clean land, a good
place to live, those things are things we should
all mutually embrace.
Song sung by Roger Jackson – Quileute
Notes
77
©2008 UM Regional Learning Project
Appendix I
READING LIST & RECOMMENED WEBSITES
General Teaching about Pacic Northwest Tribal People
Tips on how to evaluate Native American Resources, go to the University of Arizona’s
site on “Techniques on Evaluating American Indian Web sites” http://www.u.arizona.
edu/~ecubbins/webcrit.html
University of Washington essay on the history of Lushootseed, or Pacic Coastal people,
as well as an amazing digital collection of Pacic Northwest Coast Indians http://content.
lib.washington.edu/aipnw/thrush.html
Experiential Lesson of Federal Indian Policy since rst contact: “Colonization Effects From
First Encounter through US Federal Policy.” Northwest Indian Applied Research Institute.
25 August 2005. http://www.evergreen.edu/nwindian/curriculum/federalpolicy.html
Up to date information about Indian Country. The Native American Times. http://www.
nativetimes.com/index.asp
State by state events and tourism information: http://www.500nations.com/500_Places.
asp
Seattle Times article on the canoe journey to learn more about cultural revitalization.
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2002415582_canoe02e.html
Washington State tribal information: http://www.goia.wa.gov/Tribal-Information/Tribal-
Information.htm )
Read Fighting Alcohol and Substance Abuse among American Indian and Alaskan Native
Youth. ERIC Digest: http://www.ericdigests.org/pre-9221/indian.htm
“Indians of Washington State.” Ofce of the Superintendent of Public Instruction.
Olympia, WA: 1988 (reprinted October, 2000). Available through OSPI, Contact Joan
Banker, assistant to Denny Hurtado, Indian Education, Title I Program Supervisor E-Mail:
[email protected], Phone: (360) 725-6160
Slapin, Beverly and Seale, Doris, editors. Through Indian Eyes. New Society Publishers:
Philadelphia, PA, 1992. (Available for purchase: http://www.books.aisc.ucla.edu/toc/
thrueyes.html )
Stereotypes in General
Detecting Indian bias in books—a bibliography and list of books to avoid by the American
Indian Library Association: http://www.nativeculturelinks.com/ailabib.htm
Essays on Stereotyping in media and literature: http://www.hanksville.org/sand/
stereotypes/
Appendix 1
78
©2008 UM Regional Learning Project
Tribal Perspectives on American History in the Northwest – Teacher Guide
Bigelow, Bill and Peterson, Bob, editors. Rethinking Columbus: The Next 500 Years.
Rethinking Schools, Ltd.: Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 1998. Available for purchase:
< http://www.rethinkingschools.org/publication/columbus/columbus.shtml >
How to teach and use the Cornell note-taking system: Center for Learning and Teaching.
Cornell University. 5 September 2005. < http://www.clt.cornell.edu/campus/learn/
SSWorkshops/SKResources.html >
How to set up a Socratic seminar in your classroom: “Socratic Seminars.” Study.org. 28
August 2005. < http://www.studyguide.org/socratic_seminar.htm >
Treadway, Linda. “Socratic Seminars: Engaging Students in Intellectual Discourse.”
Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. 28 August 2005. < http://
www.middleweb.com/Socratic.html >
Information on how to organize and write the PSA: “Preparing Public Service
Announcements.” Community Tool Box. 05 Sepember 2005. < http://ctb.ku.edu/tools/
en/sub_section_main_1065.htm >
Also see Press Writing: < http://www.press-release-writing.com/newsletters/t54-psa.htm >
Treaties and Tribal Sovereignty
“Treaty Trail.” Washington History Online. < http://washingtonhistoryonline.org>
Washington State Historical Society, Tacoma, Wa.
Pevar, Stephen L. The Rights of Indians and Tribes: The Basic ACLU Guide to Indian and
Tribal Rights, 2nd Edition. American Civil Liberties Union, United States, 1992.
Canby, Jr., William C. American Indian Law in a Nutshell, 3rd Edition. West Publishing,
Co: St. Paul, MN, 1988.
Furse, Elizabeth. Indian Tribes Rights and Responsibilities. Institute for Tribal Government.
Portland, OR, 28 August 2005. <http://www.tribalgov.pdx.edu/resources.php >
Federally Recognized Tribes of the Columbia-Snake Basin. Publication DOE/BP-2946. U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers, U.W. Bureau of Reclamation, Bonneville Power Administration,
editors. (Available in pdf format on: http://www.osti.gov/bridge/product.biblio.jsp?osti_
id=578448&queryId=4&start=0)
Craig, Carol. Understanding Tribal Sovereignty. Pamphlet from Yakama Nation Fisheries
Program: Toppenish, WA, 2005. Carol Craig makes presentations from kindergarten
through college level classes and civic organizations for a better understanding to treaties.
Contact her at the Yakama Nation Fisheries Program, P.O. Box 151, Toppenish, WA
98948. (509)865-5121. [email protected].
“Questions & Answers on Treaty Rights.” National Coalition to Support Treaty Rights.
HONOR, Inc, Milwaukee, WI: 1993. Available for .75 per copy at: http://www.
schoolnet.ca/aboriginal/resource/18-e.html
“Treaty Indian Fisheries and Salmon Recovery.” Northwest Indian Fisheries Commission.
Streamline Video. 13 August 2004. < http://www.nwifc.wa.gov/newsinfo/streaming.asp
79
©2008 UM Regional Learning Project
“The Institute for Tribal Government.” Portland State University. 05 September 2005.
<http://www.tribalgov.pdx.edu/resources.php >
Centennial Accord/Millennium Agreement. Governor’s Ofce of Indian Affairs. 2005.
28 August 2005. <http://goia.wa.gov/Government-to-Government/Government-to-
Government.htm >
Sever, Jill. The State We’re In: Washington, Your Guide to State, Tribal, & Local
Government. The League of Women Voters of Washington Education Fund: Seattle, WA,
2004.
Pacic Northwest Artistry
Entwined With Life: Nataive American Basketry. The Burke Museum, University of
Washington. 28 August 2005. <http://www.washington.edu/burkemuseum/baskets/
index.html
Gifting and Feasting in the Northwest Coast Potlatch. Harvard College, 1999. 28 August
2005. http://www.peabody.harvard.edu/potlatch/default.html
Arts and Artistry, see Trail Tribes, Center for Lifelong Learning, University of Montana. 28
August 2005. <http://www.trailtribes.org/index.html >
“Tribal Museums.” Governors Ofce of Indian Affairs. Olympia, WA. 28 August 2005.
<http://www.goia.wa.gov/Tribal-Information/Tribal-Information.htm >
Anderson, Ross. “Still Standing.” The Seattle Times. 2003. 28 August 2005. <http://
seattletimes.nwsource.com/pacicnw/2003/0302/cover.html >
Tribal Languages and Dialects
Have students research American English dialects here in the Pacic Northwest to
impress upon them the impact of regional geography and tradition on language:
http://www.pbs.org/speak/seatosea/americanvarieties/pacicnorthwest/
Explore the “Native Languages” website to nd out what people are doing to revive and
save endangered tribal languages of the Americas: http://www.native-languages.org/
Sahaptin language dictionary: http://www.native-languages.org/sahaptin.htm
Fishing and Salmon Recovery
“Treaty Indian Fisheries and Salmon Recovery.” Northwest Indian Fisheries
Commission. Streaming Video. 13 August 2004. http://www.nwifc.wa.gov/newsinfo/
streaming.asp
Preview: “Through Salmon Eyes.” Northwest Indian Fisheries Commission. Streaming
Video. 13 August 2004. http://www.nwifc.wa.gov/newsinfo/streaming.asp
Obtain and preview ““Yakama Nation: Our Valley in Transition.” KIMA Television DVD.
Appendix 1
80
©2008 UM Regional Learning Project
Tribal Perspectives on American History in the Northwest – Teacher Guide
KIMA Television: Yakima, WA, 2003. Contact Quentin Coulter, Production Manager,
KIMA TV29, [email protected] Phone: 509.575.0029, ext. 210, fax: 509.248.1218.
“Salmon Homecoming” portion of the NWITFC site: http://www.nwifc.wa.gov/
salmonhomecoming/index.asp and reproduce some of the “Activities for Kids” for students
to complete. There are word-nds, crosswords, and other fun activities that address the
importance of salmon. These activities are for elementary and middle school grades,
though all the information is suitable for high school students.
“Sacred Salmon: A Gift to Sustain Life.” Salish Kootenai College and the National
Institute of Environmental Health Sciences. Videocassette. Yakama Tribal Fisheries
Program and KSKC: Pablo, MT, 2004. Obtain the 32 minute VHS or DVD copy of PBS’s
“Sacred Salmon: A Gift to Sustain Life” from http://www.montanapbs.org/SacredSalmon/
to explore ways tribes are working with non-Indians to protect the salmon. Also includes
rare video footage of Celilo Falls before the building of dams along the Columbia River
destroyed it.
Teach the lesson: “The Importance of Saving Salmon From Extinction” by the NIARI
Curriculum Project at Evergreen College: http://www.evergreen.edu/nwindian/curriculum/
salmon.html
Quiz students on how much they know about tribal shellsh harvesting on private
property: http://www.nwifc.wa.gov/shellsh/faq.asp
Update students on Makah Whaling. Two perspectives:
National Marine Fisheries: http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/prot_res/PR2/Conservation_and_
Recovery_Program/makah_EA.html
Makah Tribe: http://makah.com/whaling.htm
Spirituality and Culture
Burial Sites and Treatment of the Dead:
Potlatching and giving: http://www.peabody.harvard.edu/potlatch/default.html
Tse whitzen” http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/news/local/klallam/
Lower Elwha Klallam Tribe’s Views of Tse Whitzen: http://tse-whit-zen.elwha.nsn.us/
Burial customs: http://www.trailtribes.org/fortclatsop/disease-and-burial-customs.htm
Bering Land Bridge Theory, and Kennewick Man
“1491” by Charles C Mann; The Atlantic Monthly; Mar 2002; Vol. 289, Iss. 3; pg. 41, 12
David Burton’s “The Bering Land Bridge Theory Collapsing”, Vine DeLoria, Jr.’s Red Earth,
White Lies: Native Americans And The Myth Of Scientic Fact
Kennewick Man http://www.washington.edu/burkemuseum/kman/virtualexhibit_intro.htm
Umatilla Perspective on Kennewick Man: http://www.umatilla.nsn.us/ancient.html
81
©2008 UM Regional Learning Project
Other Spiritual Information:
Naming Ceremonies: http://www.trailtribes.org/lemhi/naming-ceremonies.htm
Great Circle: http://www.trailtribes.org/lemhi/great-circle.htm
Readings on Cultural Respect: http://www.alphacdc.com/treaty/r-explt.html# (This page,
part of the Midwest Treaty Network, offers essays and poetry that discuss the non-Indian
“appropriation” of native spiritual ways. Sometimes irreverent, this site would be a great
place to discuss why even well-meaning individuals who try to experience native spirituality
can be unwittingly offensive.
Appropriation of tribal spiritual ways: http://mytwobeadsworth.com/Indianrealties405.html
Indian Education & Boarding Schools
See images and lessons about government residential schools on: http://memory.loc.gov/
learn/lessons/01/indian/teacher.html
Governor Gregoire’s a promise to promote tribal education for all of our children. See:
http://www.niea.org/media/news_detail.php?id=12&catid
Teach the Library of Congress’s lesson on Boarding Schools: http://memory.loc.gov/learn/
lessons/01/indian/teacher.html
Indian Mascots
Students can discuss or research the Indian mascot controversy in college sports as well
as in their own areas. There are numerous web sites on the topic. Consider showing the
three-minute video entitled, “I Am Not a Mascot,” available at: http://www.retirethechief.
org/notamascot.html
Also see Michael Dorris’s essay entitled, “I Is Not for Indian,” with study questions crafted
by Marquette University’s America’s First Nations Collection: http://www.marquette.edu/
library/neh/dunne/I.htm
Worthwhile resources not used in this unit
“1855: Yakima Treaty Chronicles.” Yakama Indian Nation Review. Toppenish, WA,
1978 (reprinted 2004). Available for $7.50 per copy 509.865.3150/2673, P.O. Box 310,
Toppenish, WA 98948.
“Beneath Stilled Waters.” Videocassette. Interview of Ed Irby by Kirby Brumeld, ca
1970. Available through the Yakama Indian Nation library, 509-865-2255. This video
shows rare color footage of Celilo Falls before it was destroyed by hydroelectric dams.
Bill, Willard. “Breaking the Sacred Circle.” Ofce of the Superintendent of Public
Instruction. Olympia, WA: 1987 (reprinted February, 2000). Available through OSPI,
Contact Joan Banker, assistant to Denny Hurtado, Indian Education, Title I Program
Supervisor E-Mail: [email protected], Phone: (360) 725-6160
Boyd, Robert. People of the Dalles: The Indians of Wascopam Mission. University of
Nebraska Press: Lincoln, NE, 1996.
Appendix 1
82
©2008 UM Regional Learning Project
Tribal Perspectives on American History in the Northwest – Teacher Guide
“Everything Change, Everything Change: Reections of Ida Nason.” Videocassette.
University of Washington, 1986. Video available through the University of Washington
and Yakama Nation libraries. Interview with tribal elder about life at the turn of the
century.
“Indians of Washington and the Environment.” Project Learning Tree. Olympia, WA,
1986.
Kickingbird, Kirke and Lynn. Indians and the U.S. Constitution: A Forgotten Legacy.
Institute for the Development of Indian Law, Inc., Washington, DC, 1987.
“Yakama Nation: Our Valley in Transition.” KIMA Television. DVD. KIMA Television:
Yakima, WA, 2003. For your own copy, contact Quentin Coulter, Production Manager,
KIMA TV29, [email protected] Phone: 509.575.0029, ext. 210, fax
LaFrance, Joan. “The Unwritten Chapters: An American Indian Comments on American
History.” Ofce of Superintendent of Public Instruction: Olympia, WA, 1987 (reprinted
2000). Available through OSPI, Contact Joan Banker, assistant to Denny Hurtado, Indian
Education, Title I Program Supervisor E-Mail: [email protected], Phone: (360)
725-6160
Pambrun, Andrew Dominique. Sixty Years on the Frontier in the Pacic Northwest. Glen
C. Adams: Faireld, WA, 1979.
83
©2008 UM Regional Learning Project
Appendix II
Tribal Perspectives–Northwest satises the following National Social Science Standards
for detailed information please visit: www.education-world.com/standards/national/soc_sci/index.shtml
US History Geography Economics Civics
Benchmark 9-12.4 - Examination of the relationship of the United States to other nations and to world affairs.
NSS EC-9-12.4 Role of Incentives NSS EC-9-12.5 Gain from Trade
NSS G.K-12.1:
The World in Spa-
tial Terms
NSS-G.K-12.2:
Places
and Regions
NSS-G.K-12:3:
Physical
Systems
NSS-G.K-12.4: Hu-
man
Systems
NSS-G.K-12.5:
Environment
and Society
NSS-G.K-12.6: The
Uses of Geography
NSS-USH.5-12.1:
Era 1 -
Three Worlds
Meet
NSS-USH.5-12.2:
Era 2 - Colonization
and Settlement
(1585-1763)
NSS-USH.5-12.4:
Era 4 - Expansion
and Reform
(1801-1861)
NSS-USH.5-12.6:
Era 6 - The
Development of the
Industrial United
States (1870-1900)
NSS-USH.5-12.9:
Era 9 - Postwar
United States
(1945 to early
1970s)
NSS-USH.9-12.10:
Era 10 -
Contemporary
United States (1968
to the Present)
Tribal Perspectives–Northwest satises the following National Language Arts Standards
for detailed information please visit: www.education-world.com/standards/national/soc_sci/index.shtml
English
NL-ENG
K-12.1
Reading for
Perspective
NL-ENG.
K-12.2
Human
Experience
NL-ENG.
K-12.3
Evaluation
Stragegies
NL-ENG.
K-12.4
Communi-
cation Skills
NL-ENG.
K-12.4
Communi-
cation
Strategies
NL-ENG.
K-12.6
Applying
Knowledge
NL-ENG
K-12.7
Evaluating
Data
NL-ENG.
K-12.8
Developing
Research
Skills
NL-ENG.
K-12.9
Multicultural
Understanding
NL-ENG.
K-12.11
Participating
in Society
Appendix 2
84
©2008 UM Regional Learning Project
Tribal Perspectives on American History in the Northwest – Teacher Guide
Tribal Perspectives–Northwest satises the following Social Studies Standards for Montana OPI
for detailed information, please visit: www.opi.state.mt.us/Accred/cstandards.htm
Inquiry
Learning
Benchmark 12.2 - Apply criteria to evaluate information (ie: origin, authority, accuracy, bias, and distortion of
information and ideas). EU 1-7
Civic
Responsibilities
Geography
Effects of Time
and Change
Economics
Cultural
Diversity
Benchmark 12.4 - Evaluate how the unique characteristics of Montana/American Indian tribes and other cultural
groups have contributed to Montana history and contemporary life. EU 1-7
Benchmark 12.4 - Compare and contrast how values and beliefs inuence economic decisions in different
economic systems, including American Indians (ie: tribal vs. capital economics) EU 4
Benchmark 12.3 - Assess the major impacts of
human modications on the environment and
compare and contrast use of lands by different
people. EU 1,4,5
Benchmark 12.4 - Analyze how human
settlement patterns and cultural borders
create cooperation and conict which
inuence the division and control of the
Earth. EU 4,5,7
Benchmark 12.7 - Describe and
compare how people create places that
reect culture, human needs, govt policy,
history, and current values and ideas as
they design and build. EU 1,2,5,6
Benchmark 12.6 - Analyze and
evaluate conditions, actions and
motivations that contribute to conict
and cooperation within and among
groups and nations, including tribal
nations (ie: discrimination) EU 2
Benchmark 12.6 - Identify
origination of stereotypes,
and connect these to conict/
cooperation within and
among groups and nations.
EU 2-5
Benchmark 12.4 - Relate
concept of tribal sovereignty
to the unique powers of tribal
goverments as they interact
with local, state, and federal
governments. EU 5,7
Benchmark 12.5a - Analyze the
effectiveness of various systems
of government to protect the
rights and needs of citizens and
balance competing conceptions
of a just society. EU 1,4,7
Benchmark 12.1 - Select and
analyze documents, primary
and secondary sources (ie:
treaties, oral histories, court
decisions, current events,
tribal publications) that have
inuenced the legal, pollitical,
and constitutional heritage of
Montana Indians. EU 4-7
Benchmark 12.2
Interpret how
selected cultures,
historical events,
periods, and
patterns of change
inuence each
other. EU 5
Benchmark 12.6 - Investigate,
interpret, and analyze the impact of
multiple historical and contemporary
viewpoints, concerning events within
and across cultures, major world
religions, and political systems, esp.
as they relate to American Indian
cultures (ie: assimilation, values,
beliefs, conicts) EU 1-7
Benchmark 12.7 - Analyze and
illustrate the major issues concerning
history, culture, tribal sovereignty, and
current status of the Montana tribes
and bands and American Indians
(ie: gambling, artifacts, repatriation,
natural resources, language,
jurisdiction) EU 1-7
85
©2008 UM Regional Learning Project
Tribal Perspectives–Northwest satises the following Language Arts Standards for Montana OPI
for detailed information, please visit: www.opi.state.mt.us/Accred/cstandards.htm
Literature Content
Literature Content Standard 4 - Students interact with print and nonprint literary works from various cultures,
ethnic groups, traditional and contemporary viewpoints written/spoken by both genders.
EU 1-2. Benchmarks: 1. Students select, read, listen to and view a variety of traditional and contemporary
works from diverse cultures (ie: American Indian works). 2. Students analyze diverse literature to identify and
compare common human experiences within and between cultures.
Appendix 2
86
©2008 UM Regional Learning Project
Tribal Perspectives on American History in the Northwest – Teacher Guide
87
©2008 UM Regional Learning Project
Appendix III
Document Based Question Assignment
Using copies of the Oregon Land Donation Act and Neah Bay Treaty Minutes, students will
work through a Document Based Question (DBQ) assignment.
The focus will be on the differing perspectives of the lands and peoples of the American
Northwest. They will then look at the current tribal lands question, trying to nd similarities
and differences to the historical perspectives.
After studying the issue, focus will switch to the current state of land usage in the American
North West.
Day One
Read: Oregon Land Donation Act
Students: Highlight any words or phrases they are unfamiliar with.
Teacher: When students have nished reading, show them the region on the historical map
of the Northwest. Students will take notes on the following important facts:
Trappers and traders made the rst forays into the Far West during the 1820s.
Fur trappers in California and Oregon traded cattle hides with eastern merchants
for manufactured goods.
No one factor led to the early settlement and organization of the Far West more
than the establishment of Spanish missions early in the nineteenth century.
The Spanish mission was a tool for advancing political, economic, and religious
goals.
By the time Europeans came to the Northwest almost 300 years had passed,
and European explorers had traveled to and mapped nearly all parts of North
and South America—except the Pacic Northwest.
In the 18th century European traders cherished the hope of nding an easily
accessible waterway across North America. They based their hopes on legendary
accounts about the Northwest Passage.
The people of the Northwest coast lived in orderly, hierarchical societies based
on extended family groups.
Overall, trading for services and material goods was a vital component of Indian
life on the Northwest Coast. When Europeans arrived with trade goods, coastal
Indians saw the opportunity for advancement within their own societies by
accumulating rare and exotic European goods such as copper, beads and iron
blades.
Appendix 3
88
©2008 UM Regional Learning Project
Tribal Perspectives on American History in the Northwest – Teacher Guide
Leaders such as Chief Maquinna of Nootka Sound and Chief Wickeninish
of Clayoquot Sound exercised control over trading empires in the interior,
organizing labor and setting the terms for trade at the coast. As their wealth
grew, so did their prestige, because they were able to redistribute more and
more goods.
There are various theories about how smallpox was introduced to the Northwest
Coast, but most historians agree that this deadly disease rst began to ravage
Indian populations in the region between the mid-1770s and early 1780s.
Because Native peoples had never before been introduced to the disease, they
had no natural immunity, and a virgin-soil epidemic ensued. In combination
with other diseases such as inuenza and malaria, smallpox wiped out roughly
65 to 95% of Northwestern Indian populations by 1840.
Indian groups on the coast made extensive use of cedar trees and salmon. For
example, Cedar bark, with its long, malleable bers, was perfect for weaving
baskets, hats, and clothes. Cedar was also used for constructing housing, canoes,
and boxes.
For coastal peoples, as well as their neighbors in the interior, salmon provided a
food staple and functioned in a ceremonial capacity as well. Indian people also
actively shaped their environment, often using re to clear the land and make
it more favorable for hunting and gathering food.
For many Indian people of the Northwest, the natural environment was animate.
That is to say, the animals and specic locations on the land were alive with
meaning and formed the center of an oral literature common to the people of
a specic language group. Stories about Coyote, Raven, Eagle, and Beaver are
good examples of these types of oral literature
Discuss any words students were unfamiliar with that did not get discussed in the facts
lecture.
Assign: Analyzing Written Documents
Day Two
Read: Neah Bay Treaty Minutes
Students: In small groups, discuss the language which illustrates the land-usage perspective.
What is the intent for the land? Discuss ndings in larger class setting.
Assign: Analyzing Written Documents
Day Three
Using the Analyzing Written Documents worksheets, students may write a short essay on the
following: Compare traditional Native American views of the land to that of the Western
Europeans entering the territory. Were they negotiating on equal terms? Have our views of
89
©2008 UM Regional Learning Project
the land changed over the years? How?
Cite specic examples from the readings and answer the questions thoroughly.
NOTE: Teachers are encouraged to research and bring in comparative documents to
augment each of the above activities. Oral histories (tribal and immigrant), photographs,
journals, newspaper clippings, etc. are good examples of the range and type of original
documents that might enhance this activity.
Appendix 3
90
©2008 UM Regional Learning Project
Tribal Perspectives on American History in the Northwest – Teacher Guide
Name:_____________________________ Teacher:_______________________________
Analyzing Written Documents
Document type:
_____ certicate _____ letter/note/email _____ article (newspaper, magazine)
_____ postcard _____ diary/journal _____ membership card
_____ health report _____ birth/death certicate _____ census report
_____ agreement _____ minutes (reports) _____ government document
_____ manual _____ public record _____ other
Part 1 - Objective Observation
Part 2 - Subjective Observation
(answer on separate piece of paper)
What do you consider to be the three most important pieces of information from this 1.
document?
Does this document tell you anything about the time period in which it was written?2.
What questions do you have that cannot be answered in the document?3.
Author
(person, group, or agency)
Date or Time Period
Purpose
Clues
(handwritten or typed, ofcial seal,
pictures or symbols, added notations)
91
©2008 UM Regional Learning Project
Oregon Land Donation Act
Document: The Donation Land Claim Act, 1850
An Act to create the Ofce of Surveyor-General of the Public Lands in Oregon, and to
provide for the Survey, and to make Donations to Settlers of the said Public Lands.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United
States of America in Congress assembled, That a surveyor-general shall be
appointed for the Territory of Oregon, who shall have the same authority,
perform the same duties respecting the public lands and private land claims
in the Territory of Oregon, as are vested in and required of the surveyor
of lands in the United States northwest of the Ohio, except as hereinafter
provided.
Sec. 2 And be it further enacted, That the said surveyor-general shall
establish his ofce at such place within the said Territory as the President
of the United States may from time to time direct; he shall be allowed an
annual salary of two thousand ve hundred dollars, to be paid quarter-yearly,
and to commence at such time as he shall enter into bond, with competent
security, for the faithful discharge of the duties of his ofce. There shall be,
and hereby is, appropriated the sum of four thousand dollars, or as much
thereof as is necessary for clerk hire in his ofce; and the further sum of one
thousand dollars per annum for ofce rent, fuel, books, stationary, and other
incidental expenses of his ofce, to be paid out of the appropriation for
surveying the public lands.
Sec.3. And be it further enacted, That if, in the opinion of the Secretary of
the Interior, it be preferable, the surveys in the said Territory shall be made
after what is known as the geodetic method, under such regulations, and
upon such terms, as may be provided by the Secretary of the Interior of other
Department having charge of the surveys of the public lands, and that said
geodetic surveys shall be followed by topographical surveys, as Congress may
from time to time authorize and direct; but if the present mode of survey
be adhered to, then it shall be the duty of said surveyor to cause a base line,
and meridian to be surveyed, marked, and established, in the usual manner,
at or near the mouth of the Willamette River; and he shall also cause to be
surveyed, in townships and sections, in the usual manner, and in accordance
with the laws of the United States, which may be in force, the district of
country lying between the summit of the Cascade Mountains and the Pacic
Ocean, and south and north of the Columbia River: Provided, however, That
none other than township lines shall be run where the land is deemed unt
for cultivation. That no deputy surveyor shall charge for any line except such
as may be actually run and marked, nor for any line not necessary to be run;
and that the whole cost of surveying shall not exceed the rate of eight dollars
per mile, for every mile and part of mile actually surveyed and marked.
Appendix 3
92
©2008 UM Regional Learning Project
Tribal Perspectives on American History in the Northwest – Teacher Guide
Sec.4. And be it further enacted, That there shall be, and hereby is, granted
to every white settler or occupant of the public lands, American half-breed
Indians included, above the age of eighteen years, being a citizen of the
United States, or having made a declaration according to law, of his intention
to become a citizen, or who shall make such declaration on or before the rst
day of December, eighteen hundred and fty, and who shall have resided
upon and cultivated the same for four consecutive years, and shall otherwise
conform to the provisions of this act, the quantity of one half section, or
three hundred and twenty acres of land, if a single man, and if a married
man, or if he shall become married within one year from the rst day of
December, eighteen hundred and fty, the quantity of one section, or six
hundred and forty acres, one half to himself and the other half to his wife,
and enter the same on the records of his ofce; and in all cases where such
married persons have compiled with the provisions of this act, so as to entitle
them to the grant as above provided, whether under the late provisional
government of Oregon, or since, and either shall have died before patent
issues, the survivor and children or heirs of the deceased shall be entitled to
the share or interest of the decreased in equal proportions, except where
the deceased shall otherwise dispose of it by testament duly and properly
executed according to the laws of Oregon: Provided, That no alien shall be
entitled to a patent to land, granted by this act, until he shall produce to the
surveyor-general of Oregon, record evidence of his naturalization as a citizen
of the United States has been completed; but if any alien, having made his
declaration of intention to become a citizen of the United States, after the
passage of this act, shall die before his naturalization shall be completed,
the possessory right acquired by him under the provisions of this act shall
descend to his heirs at law, or pass to his devisees, to whom, as the case may
be, the patent shall issue: Provided, further, That in all cases provided for
in this section, the donation shall embrace the land actually occupied and
cultivated by the settler thereon: Provided, further, That all future contracts
by any person or persons entitled to the benets of this act, for the sale of
the land to which he or they may be entitled under this act before he or they
have received a patent therefor, shall be void: Provided, further, however,
That this section shall not be so construed as to allow those claiming rights
under the treaty with Great Britain relative to the Oregon Territory, to claim
both under this grant and the treaty, but merely to secure them the election,
and conne them to a single grant of land.
Sec.5. And be it further enacted, That to all white male citizens of the United
States or persons who shall have made a declaration of intention to become
such, above the age of twenty-one years, emigrating to and settling in said
Territory between the rst day of December, eighteen hundred and fty,
and the rst day of December, eighteen hundred and fty-three; and to
all white male citizens, not hereinbefore provided for, becoming one and
twenty years of age, in said Territory, and settling there between the times
93
©2008 UM Regional Learning Project
last aforesaid, who shall in other respects comply with the foregoing section
and the provisions of this law, there shall be, and hereby is, granted the
quantity of one quarter section, or one hundred and sixty acres of land, if
a single man; or if married, or if he shall become married within one year
after becoming twenty-one years of age as aforesaid, the quantity of one half
section, or three hundred and twenty acres, one half to the husband and
the other half to the wife in her own right, to be designated by the surveyor-
general as aforesaid: Provided always, That no person shall ever receive a
patent for more than one donation of land in said Territory in his or her own
right: Provided, That no mineral lands shall be located or granted under the
provisions of this act.
Sec.6. And be it further enacted, That within three months after the survey
has been made, or where the survey has been made before the settlement
commenced, then within three months from the commencement of such
settlement, each of said settlers shall notify the surveyor-general, to be
appointed under this act, of the precise tract or tracts claimed by them
respectively under this law, and in all cases it shall be in a compact form;
and where it is practicable by legal subdivisions; but where that cannot be
done, it shall be the duty of the said surveyor-general to survey and mark
each claim with the boundaries as claimed, at the request and expense of the
claimant; the charge for the same in each case not to exceed the price paid
for surveying the public lands. The surveyor-general shall enter a description
of such claims in a book to be kept by him for that purpose, and note,
temporarily, on the township plats, the tract or tracts so designated, with the
boundaries; and whenever a conict of boundaries shall arise prior to issuing
the patent, the same shall be determined by the surveyor-general: Provided,
That after the rst December next, all claims shall be bounded by lines
running east and west, and north and south: And provided, further, That
after the survey is made, all claims shall be made in conformity to the same,
and in compact form.
Sec. 7. And be it further enacted, That within twelve months after the
surveys have been made, or, where the survey has been made before
the settlement, then within twelve months from the time the settlement
was commenced, each person claiming a donation right under this act
shall prove to the satisfaction of the surveyor-general, or of such other
ofcer as may be appointed by law for that purpose, that the settlement
and cultivation required by this act has been commenced, specifying the
time of the commencement; and at any time after the expiration of four
years from the date of such settlement, whether made under the laws of
the late provisional government or not, shall prove in like manner, by two
disinterested witnesses, the fact of continued residence and cultivation
required by the fourth section of this act; and upon such proof being made,
the surveyor-general, or other ofcer appointed by law for that purpose,
Appendix 3
94
©2008 UM Regional Learning Project
Tribal Perspectives on American History in the Northwest – Teacher Guide
shall issue certicates under such rules and regulations as may be prescribed
by the commissioner of the general land ofce, setting forth the facts of
the case, and specifying the land to which the parties are entitled. And the
said surveyor-general shall return the proof so taken to the ofce of the
commissioner of the general land ofce, and if the said commissioner shall
nd no valid objections thereto, patents shall issue for the land according to
the certicates aforesaid, upon the surrender thereof.
Sec. 8. And be it further enacted, That upon the death of any settler before
the expiration of the four years’ continued possession required by this act, all
the rights of the deceased under this act shall descend to the heirs at law of
such settler, including the widow, where one is left, in equal parts; and proof
of compliance with the conditions of this act up to the time of the death of
such settler shall be sufcient to entitle them to the patent.
Sec.9. And be it further enacted, That no claim to a donation right under
the provisions of this act, upon sections sixteen or thirty-six, shall be valid or
allowed, if the residence and cultivation upon which the same is founded
shall have commenced after the survey of the same; nor shall such claim
attach to any tract or parcel of land selected for a military post, or within one
mile thereof, or to any other land reserved for governmental purposes, unless
the residence and cultivation thereof shall have commenced pervious to the
selection or reservation of the same for such purposes.
Sec.10. And be it further enacted, That there be, and hereby is, granted
to the Territory of Oregon the quantity of two townships of land in the
said Territory, west of the Cascade Mountains, and to be selected in legal
subdivisions after the same has been surveyed, by the legislative assembly of
said Territory, in such a manner as it may deem proper, one to be located
north, and the other south, of the Columbia River, to aid in the establishment
of the university in the Territory of Oregon, in such manner as the said
legislative assembly may direct, the selection to be approved by the surveyor-
general.
Sec.11. And be it further enacted, That what is known as the “Oregon city
claim,” excepting the Abernathy Island, which is hereby conrmed to the
legal assigns of the Willamette Milling and Trading Companies, shall be
set apart and be at the disposal of the legislative assembly, the proceeds
thereof to be applied by said legislative assembly to the establishment and
endowment of a university, to be located at such place in the Territory as the
legislative assembly may designate: Provided, however, That all lots and parts
of lots in said claim, sold or granted by Doctor John McLaughlin, previous to
the fourth of March, eighteen hundred and forty-nine, shall be conrmed to
the purchaser or donee, or their assigns, to be certied to the commissioner
of the general land ofce, by the surveyor-general, and patents to issue on
said certicates, as in other cases: Provided, further, That nothing in this
95
©2008 UM Regional Learning Project
act contained shall be so construed or executed, as in any way to destroy
or affect any rights to land in said Territory, holden or claimed under the
provisions of the treaty or treaties existing between this country and Great
Britain.
Sec.12. And be it further enacted, That all persons claiming land under
any of the provisions of this act, by virtue of settlement and cultivation
commenced subsequent to the rst of December, in the year eighteen
hundred and fty, shall rst make afdavit before the surveyor-general, who
is hereby authorized to administer all such oaths or afrmations, or before
some other competent ofcer, that the land claimed by them is for their own
use and cultivation; that they are not acting directly or indirectly as agent
for, or in the employment of others, in making such claims; and that they
have made no sale or transfer, or any arrangement or agreement for any sale,
transfer, or alienation oft he same, or by which the said land shall ensure to
the benets of any other person. And all afdavits required by this act shall
be entered of record, by the surveyor-general, in a book to be kept by him
for that purpose; and on proof, before a court of competent jurisdiction, that
any such oaths or afrmations are false or fraudulent, the persons making
such false or fraudulent oaths or afrmations are false or fraudulent, the
subject to all the pains and penalties of perjury.
Sec.13. And be it further enacted, That all questions arising under this act
shall be ajudged by the surveyor-general as preliminary to a nal decision
accord to law; and it shall be the duty of the surveyor-general, under the
direction of the commissioner of the general land ofce, to cause proper tract
books to be opened for the lands in Oregon, and to do and perform all other
acts and things necessary and proper to carry out the provisions of this act.
Sec.14. And be it further enacted, That no mineral lands, nor lands
reserved for salines, shall be liable to any claim under and by virtue of the
provisions of this act; and that such portions of the public lands as may be
designated under the authority of the President of the United States, for
forts, magazines, arsenals, dock-yards, and other needful public uses, shall
be reserved and excepted from the operation of this act; Provided, That if it
shall be deemed necessary, in the judgement of the President, to include in
any such reservation the improvements of any settler made previous to the
passage of this act, it shall in such case be the duty of the Secretary of War to
cause the value of such improvements to be ascertained, and the amount so
ascertained shall be paid to the party entitled hereto, out of any money not
otherwise appropriated.
Approved, September 27, 1850.
Appendix 3
96
©2008 UM Regional Learning Project
Tribal Perspectives on American History in the Northwest – Teacher Guide
Minutes of the Makah Treaty Negotiations, 1855
Record provided by Makah Cultural & Research Center in Neah Bay, Washington.
Transcribed by Regional Learning Project, University of Montana.
Monday, January 29
th
The Schooner reached Neah Bay on the evening of the 28
th
, and today the tents,
goods and men were landed, and the camp established. Gov. Stevens, the agent and
interpreter, immediately put them-selves in-communication with the Indians of the Bay
through the medium of Catp. E.S. Fowler, a Klallam sub-chief called Captain Jack, who
spoke the Makah language, and two Makahs, Swell or Jefferson Davis and Peter who
spoke Chinook. Expresses were immediately sent off to bring in the other Makah Villages,
and, also, if possible, the tribes adjoining them on the Coast.
Tuesday, Jan. 30
th
Gov. Stevens and the Secretary (George Gibbs) crossed the peninsula of Cape Flattery to
the Coast for the purpose of making a general examination of the Country and selecting
a spot suitable for the separate reserve of this Tribe and such others as might be included
with them. The Indians of other Makah Villages arrived today but stated that the other
Tribe could not be called (until) several days. It was accordingly determined to send for
them to meet at Gray’s Harbor. In the evening Governor Stevens called a meeting of the
proposed Treaty more particularly. Being interrogated as to their relations with the tribes
below them, they said that with the Kwe-Sch-tut or Kwillch-Yutes they were on terms
of amity, as also with the Kwaak-Sat or Hooch, but that with the next band or tribe the
Kwites or Kehis-a-hunt, they were not, that tribe having killed one of their people some
years ago. They did not however desire to cherish any animosity, but did not know the
feelings of that Tribe towards them. They were directed to make a full return of each of
their own villages the next day.
Governor Stevens then formally mentioned the principal features of the proposed treaty
as follows. The Great Father had sent him here to watch over the Indians. He had talked
with the other Tribes of the Sound and they had proceeded to be good friends with their
neighbors, and he had now come to talk with the Makahs. When he had done here he
was going to the Indians down the Coast and would make them friends to the Makahs.
He has treaties with the Sound Tribes for their lands, setting aside reserves for them,
and had stipulated to give them a school, farms, etc. etc. and a physician when he had
nished.
Klachote of Neah Bay spoke: “Before the Big Chiefs (Kleh-sitt the White Chief, Yall-a-
coom or Flattery Jack and Heh-iks) died, he was not the head chief himself, he was only a
small chief, but though there were many Indians then, he was not the least of them. He
knew the Country all round and therefore he had a right to speak. He thought he ought
to have the right to sh, and take whales and get food when he liked. He was afraid that
if he could not take halibut where he wanted, he would become poor.”
Keh-tchook of the Stone House followed: “What Kalchote has said was his wish. His
country extended up to Hoke-ho. He did not want to deny the salt water.”
97
©2008 UM Regional Learning Project
Gov. Stevens informed them “that so far from wishing to stop their sheries, he wished to
send the oil kettles, and shing apparatus.”
Kla-pe-at-hoo of Neah Bay: “Since his brother dies he had been sick at heart. (his
brother was the late 3
rd
chief.) He was willing to sell his land; all he wanted was the right
of shing.”
Tse-Kaw-wootl: “He wanted the sea. That was his country. If whales were killed and
oated ashore, he wanted for his people the exclusive right of taking them and if their
slaves ran away, they wanted to get them back.”
Klah-co-at-hu: “He and Kal-chote lived together. They did not want to leave their old
house.”
Tse-Kaw-Wootl said “The same thing – He too only wanted his house.”
Ka-bach-sat of Tso-yess – “My heart is not bad but I do not wish to leave all my land. I
am willing you should have half, but I want the other half myself. You know my country, I
want part for my village. It is very good. I want the place where the stream comes in.”
It-an-da-ha of Waatch – “My Father! My Father. I now give you my heart. When any
ships come and the whites injure me I will apply to my father and will tell him of my
trouble and look to him for help, and if any Indians wish to kill me, I shall still call on my
father, I shall submit all my difculties to him. My wish is like the rest. I do not wish to
leave the salt water. I want to sh in common with the whites. I don’t ever want to sell
all the land. I want a part in common with the whites to plant potatoes on. I want the
place where my house is. We do not want to say much, we are all of one mind. I have
no particular country myself – mine and that of Tse-kaw-woot are the same.”
Kah-tchook, again, “I do not want you to leave me destitute – I want my house on the
Island” (Tatooshe Island, commonly called the Stone House.)
Governor Stevens asked “whether if the right of drying sh wherever they pleased was
left them, they could not agree to live at one place for a winter residence and potato
ground, explaining the view of sub-division of lands and he desired them to think the
matter over during the night. They were also directed to consult among themselves upon
the choice of a head chief. As they declared doing this on the ground that they were all
of equal rank, he selected Tse-kaw-wootl, the Osett Chief as the head, a choice in which
they all acquiesced with satisfaction.”
Temporary papers, in lieu of commissions, were then issued to Kal-chote, and Klah-pe-
at-hu of Neah Bay. Kch-tchook of the Stone House, It-an-daha of Waatch, Hwatte and
Ke-bach-sat of Tso-yess as subchiefs. Col. Simmons then explained to them “That these
papers were given them as evidences that they were chiefs, that as such they must take
care of their people and that by and by the Great papers would be given them. On
his former visit they had declined to receive papers by now they were evidently much
valued.”
The General Council was then adjourned to the next day.
Appendix 3
98
©2008 UM Regional Learning Project
Tribal Perspectives on American History in the Northwest – Teacher Guide
January 31, Wednesday
The heads of the Treaty had been adjusted and in the morning the Indians were again
assembled – Two additional Sub chiefs received papers.
Viz: Tah-a-Kowtl of Osett and Kets-Knesum of the Stone House. The number of the
whole tribe was found to be 600.
Governor Stevens then addressed them: “My children – I have seen many other of my
children before now. They have been glad to see me and to hear the words of the Great
Father. I saw the Great Father a short time since and sent me here to see you and give
you his mind. The Whites are crowding in upon you and in the Great Father wishes to
give you your homes. He wants to buy your land and give you a fair price but leaving you
enough to live on and raise your potatoes. He knows what whalers you are, how you go
far to sea, to take whales. He will send you barrels in which to put your oil, kettles to try
it out, lines and implements to sh with – the Great Father wants your children to go to
school and learn trades and this will be done if we sign it. If it is good I ______ it to the
Great Father, and if he likes it he will send it back with his name. If he wants it altered he
will let you know. When it is agreed to it is a bargain.”
The treaty was then read to them, interpreted clause by clause, and explained.
Governor Stevens then asked if they were satised. If they were to say so – if not to
answer freely and state their objections.
Tse-Kaw-Wootl brought up a white ag and presented it saying, “Look at this ag, see if
there are any spots on it. There are none, and there are none on our hearts.”
Kalchote presented another ag. “What you have said was good and what you have
written is good.”
The Indians then signed the Treaty, and were followed by the Indian Chief and
principal men.
The presents were afterwards distributed and in the evening the party re-embarked.
Owning to the wind the vessel did not reach Port Townsend till the 3
rd
of February. The
next day (February 4
th
) Gov. Stevens left with some of the party, in the steamer Major
Tough Times for Victoria in order to confer with Gov. Douglass on the subject of the
Northern Indians and on the 5
th
returned to Port Townsend and reached Olympic on the
night of the 6
th
.
A copy Attest.
George Gibbs
Secretary L.C.
99
©2008 UM Regional Learning Project
Appendix IV
Deep Mapping
The following excercise is designed to assist students in understanding the geography
and change over time of the American Northwest. Each chapter has an activity to be
completed prior to viewing the video. The activities can be completed on a chapter by
chapter basis.
Each activity may require access to the internet and the library for research.
Prior to begining, choose a matching area of both the 1881 Map and the Base Map
(located in the back cover pocket of this guide) that represents your current location, or
an area your class is interested in studying on a deeper level. A portion of the map 6 by
6 inches will be sufcient for study. Enlarge the same area of each map 200%. Make
enough copies of each map for every student, or have students work in small groups.
Chapter One
Provide each student a copy of the Base Map, and the 1881 Map. Read to
the class the oral tradition Bridge of the Gods [included here, on the following
pages]. Can you locate the places noted in the story?
What are the traditional language groups in the American Northwest?
Identify their regions and mark them on the map. For reference and
comparison, see USGS Linguistic map included in back ap of this guide.
Chapter Two
Provide each student a copy of the Base Map. Can you identify any Native
American place names? Highlight them. What can place names tell us about
the original inhabitants?
Chapter Three
Using the 1881 Map as a reference, read examples from Lewis and Clark’s
journals. Do you live by the trail they followed? If so, where? Mark it on the
map.
Chapter Four
Using the 1881 Map as a reference, read examples from Lewis and Clark’s
journals. Who were the tribes that lived along the trail in your area? Identify
them on the map. [see NW Tribal Homelands map for comparison]
Chapter Five
Using the Base Map as a reference, identify and mark the fur trading posts
and dates of original settlements. Why were these locations chosen? Do
they still exist today? How have they changed?
Appendix 4
100
©2008 UM Regional Learning Project
Tribal Perspectives on American History in the Northwest – Teacher Guide
Chapter Six
Using the Base Map as a reference, identify and mark the early Missions.
Why were they located where they were?
Chapter Seven
Using the 1881 Map and the Base Map as references, identify and mark the
original reservations that resulted from the Treaty Councils. How did the
Native American lands change as a result?
Chapter Eight
Using the Base Map as a reference, identify the reservation lands that
remain today, after the discovery of gold on Native lands. Did they change
signicantly from the areas originally identied on the 1881 Map? Why?
How did settlements affect reservations?
NOTE: Teachers are encouraged to research and bring-in comparative documents to
augment each of the above activities. Oral histories (tribal and immigrant), photographs,
journals, newspaper clippings, etc. are good examples of the range and type of original
documents that might enhance this activity.
Bridge of the Gods
[resource provided for Chapter One]
Excerpt from:
Ella E. Clark, Indian Legends of the Pacic Northwest (Berkeley: University of
California Press, 1953), pp. 20 -23.
Long ago, when the world was young, all people were happy. The Great
Spirit, whose home is in the sun, gave them all they needed. No one was
hungry, no one was cold.
But after a while, two brothers quarreled over the land. The older one
wanted most of it, and the younger one wanted most of it. The Great Sprit
decided to stop the quarrel. One night while the brothers were asleep he
took them to a new land, to a country with high mountains. Between the
mountains owed a big river.
The Great Spirit took the two brothers to the top of the high mountains and
wakened them. They saw that the new country was rich and beautiful.
“Each of you will shoot an arrow in opposite directions,” he said to them.”
Then you will follow your arrow. Where your arrow falls, that will be your
country. There you will become a great chief. The river will separate your
lands.”
101
©2008 UM Regional Learning Project
One brother shot his arrow south into the valley of the Willamette River.
He became the father and the high chief of the Multnomah people. The
other brother shot his arrow north into the Klickitat country. He became the
father and high chief of the Klickitat people.
Then the Great Spirit built a bridge over the big river. To each brother he
said, “I have built a bridge over the river, so that you and your people may
visit those on the other side. It will be a sign of peace between you. As long
as you and your people are good and are friendly with each other, this
bridge of the Tahmahnawis will remain.”
It was a broad bridge, wide enough for many people and many ponies
to walk across at one time. For many snows the people were at peace
and crossed the river for friendly visits. But after a time they did wicked
things. They were selsh and greedy, and they quarreled. The Great Spirit,
displeased again, punished them by keeping the sun from shining. The
people had no re, and when the winter rains came, they were cold. Then
they began to be sorry for what they had done, and they begged the Great
Spirit for re. “Give us re, or we will die from the cold,” they prayed. The
heart of the Great Spirit was softened by their prayer. He went to an old
woman who had kept herself from the wrongdoing of her people and so
still had some re in her lodge. “If you will share your re, I will grant you
anything you wish,” the Great Spirit promised her. “What do you want
most?”
“Youth and beauty,” answered the old woman promptly. “I wish to be
young again, and to be beautiful.”
“You shall be young and beautiful tomorrow morning,” promised the Great
Spirit. “Take your re to the bridge, so that the people on both sides of the
river can get it easily. Keep it burning there always as a reminder of the
goodness and kindness of the Great Spirit.”
The old woman, whose name was Loo-wit, did as he said. Then the Great
Spirit commanded the sun to shine again. When it rose the next morning,
it was surprised to see a young and beautiful maiden sitting beside a re on
the Bridge of the Gods. The people, too, saw the re, and soon their lodges
were warm again. For many moons all was peaceful on both sides of the
great river and the bridge.
The young men also saw the re-and the beautiful young woman who
attended it. They visited her often. Loo-wit’s heart was stirred by two of
them-a handsome young chief from south of the river, whose name was
Wyeast, and a handsome young chief from north of the river, whose name
was Klickitat. She could not decide which of the two she liked better.
Appendix 4
102
©2008 UM Regional Learning Project
Tribal Perspectives on American History in the Northwest – Teacher Guide
Wyeast and Klickitat grew jealous of each other and soon began to quarrel.
They became so angry that they fought. Their people also took up the
quarrel, so that there was much ghting on both sides of the river. Many
warriors were killed.
This time the Great Spirit was made angry by the wickedness of the people.
He broke down the Bridge of the Gods, the sign of peace between the
two tribes, and its rocks fell into the river. He changed the two chiefs into
mountains. Some say they continued to quarrel over Loo-wit even after
they were mountain peaks. They caused sheets of ame to burst forth, and
they hurled hot rocks at each other. Not thrown far enough, many fell into
the river and blocked it. That is why the Columbia is very narrow and the
water very swift at The Dalles.
Loo-wit was changed into a snow-capped peak which still has the youth
and beauty promised by the Great Spirit. She is now called Mount St.
Helens. Wyeast is known as Mount Hood, and Klickitat as Mount Adams.
The rocks and the white water where the Bridge of the Gods fell are known
as the Cascades of the Columbia.
103
©2008 UM Regional Learning Project
Appendix V
Timeline
Native American peoples have developed a number of ingenious ways to keep their
tribal histories alive including systematic and ceremonial recounting of Oral Traditions,
Winter Counts and Time Balls. This exercise can be adapted in a number of different ways
to reect upon student’s own identities based on family traditions and geography. The
following are some suggestions.
Using the spiral timeline Federal Indian Policies as an example, provide each student
with a blank spiral timeline. [These resources are included in the supplements pocket
inside the back cover of this guide.] Students can create symbols, drawings, photographs,
collages from old magazines, etc. to illustrate the following timelines. Begin in the center
and work your way outward.
Example One: Personal history
What are the main events in your life? Pick ve to ten events to illustrate
your life. Place them accordingly on the timeline.
Example Two: Family history
Do you know your family history? Where does your family come from?
How far back can you trace your family? What are the stories that identify
your heritage?
Example Three: City/Town history
What is the history of your town? What are the main events? How has your
town changed over time?
Example Four: Natural Events
Does your family tell stories about amazing natural events that effected them?
The great dustbowl? Or, the erruption of Mount St. Hellens? What are the
examples from your own family history?
NOTE: This activity can be adapted in numerous ways. Teachers are encouraged
to develop timeline activities that are relevant to their individual students and
classrooms.
Appendix 5