48
Hygiene Plan (CHP), the following non-
mandatory recommendations were based
on the National Research Council’s (NRC)
2011 edition of ‘‘Prudent Practices in the
Laboratory: Handling and Management
of Chemical Hazards.’’ This reference,
henceforth referred to as ‘‘Prudent
Practices,’’ is available from the National
Academies Press, 500 Fifth Street NW.,
Washington DC 20001 (www.nap.edu).
‘‘Prudent Practices’’ is cited because of
its wide distribution and acceptance and
because of its preparation by recognized
authorities in the laboratory community
through the sponsorship of the NRC.
However, these recommendations do not
modify any requirements of the OSHA
Laboratory standard. This appendix
presents pertinent recommendations
from ‘‘Prudent Practices,’’ organized into
a form convenient for quick reference
during operation of a laboratory and
during development and application of
a CHP. For a detailed explanation and
justication for each recommendation,
consult ‘‘Prudent Practices.’’
‘‘Prudent Practices’’ deals with both
general laboratory safety and many
types of chemical hazards, while the
Laboratory standard is concerned
primarily with chemical health hazards
as a result of chemical exposures.
The recommendations from ‘‘Prudent
Practices’’ have been paraphrased,
combined, or otherwise reorganized in
order to adapt them for this purpose.
However, their sense has not been
changed.
Section F contains information from the
U.S. Chemical Safety Board’s (CSB)
Fiscal Year 2011 Annual Performance and
Accountability report and Section F
contains recommendations extracted
from the CSB’s 2011 case study, ‘‘Texas
Tech University Laboratory Explosion,’’
available from: http://www.csb.gov/.
Culture of Safety
With the promulgation of the
Occupational Safety and Health
Administration (OSHA) Laboratory
standard (29 CFR 1910.1450), a culture
of safety consciousness, accountability,
organization, and education has
developed in industrial, governmental,
and academic laboratories. Safety
and training programs have been
implemented to promote the safe
handling of chemicals from ordering
to disposal, and to train laboratory
personnel in safe practices. Laboratory
personnel must realize that the welfare
and safety of each individual depends
on clearly dened attitudes of teamwork
and personal responsibility. Learning to
participate in this culture of habitual risk
assessment, experiment planning, and
consideration of worst-case possibilities—
for oneself and one’s fellow workers—is
as much part of a scientic education as
learning the theoretical background of
experiments or the step-by-step protocols
for doing them in a professional manner. A
crucial component of chemical education
for all personnel is to nurture basic
attitudes and habits of prudent behavior
so that safety is a valued and inseparable
part of all laboratory activities throughout
their career.
Over the years, special techniques have
been developed for handling chemicals
safely. Local, state, and federal
regulations hold institutions that sponsor
chemical laboratories accountable for
providing safe working environments.
Beyond regulation, employers and
scientists also hold themselves personally
responsible for their own safety, the
safety of their colleagues and the safety
of the general public. A sound safety
organization that is respected by all
requires the participation and support of
laboratory administrators, workers, and
students. A successful health and safety
program requires a daily commitment
from everyone in the organization. To be
most effective, safety and health must
be balanced with, and incorporated into,
laboratory processes. A strong safety
and health culture is the result of positive
workplace attitudes—from the chief
executive ofcer to the newest
hire; involvement and buy-in of all
members of the workforce; mutual,
meaningful, and measurable safety and
health improvement goals; and policies
and procedures that serve as reference
tools, rather than obscure rules.
In order to perform their work in a
prudentmanner, laboratory personnel
must consider the health, physical, and
environmental hazards of the chemicals
they plan to use in an experiment.
However, the ability to accurately identify
and assess laboratory hazards must be
taught and encouraged through training
and ongoing organizational support. This
training must be at the core of every
good health and safety program. For
management to lead, personnel to assess
worksite hazards, and hazards to be
eliminated or controlled, everyone
involved must be trained.
A. General Principles
1. Minimize All Chemical Exposures and
Risks
Because few laboratory chemicals are
without hazards, general precautions for
handling all laboratory chemicals should
be adopted. In addition to these general
guidelines, specic guidelines for
chemicals that are used frequently or are
particularly hazardous should be adopted.
Laboratory personnel should conduct
their work under conditions that minimize
the risks from both known and unknown
hazardous substances. Before beginning
any laboratory work, the hazards and risks
associated with an experiment or activity
should be determined and the necessary
safety precautions implemented. Every
laboratory should develop facility-specic
policies and procedures for the highest-
risk materials and procedures used
in their laboratory. To identify these,
consideration should be given to past
accidents, process conditions, chemicals
used in large volumes, and particularly
hazardous chemicals.
Perform Risk Assessments for
Hazardous Chemicals and Procedures
Prior to Laboratory Work:
(a) Identify chemicals to be used,
amounts required, and circumstances
of use in the experiment. Consider any
special employee or laboratory conditions
that could create or increase a hazard.
Consult sources of safety and health
information and experienced scientists
to ensure that those conducting the risk
assessment have sufcient expertise.
(b) Evaluate the hazards posed by the
chemicals and the experimental
conditions. The evaluation should cover
toxic, physical, reactive, ammable,
explosive, radiation, and biological
hazards, as well as any other potential
hazards posed by the chemicals.
(c) For a variety of physical and
chemical reasons, reaction scale-ups
pose special risks, which merit additional
prior review and precautions.
(d) Select appropriate controls to
minimize risk, including use of engineering
controls, administrative controls, and
personal protective equipment (PPE)
to protect workers from hazards. The
controls must ensure that OSHA’s
Permissible Exposure contingencies and
be aware of the institutional procedures in
the event of emergencies and accidents.
One sample approach to risk
assessment is to answer these ve
questions:
(a) What are the hazards?
(b) What is the worst thing that could
happen?
(c) What can be done to prevent this
from happening?
(d) What can be done to protect from
these hazards?
(e) What should be done if something
goes wrong?
2. Avoid Underestimation of Risk
Even for substances of no known