BOLD®: Transmission Line Design Considerations
7
Figure 11
Figure 11
95% Phase Compaction Requirement
One key requirement for all line engineers working on a long BOLD transmission line project, limited by
voltage or stability considerations, is to maintain the compact phase spacing for 95% of the overall line
length. Typically, lines in excess of 50 miles are considered “long” transmission lines, and are therefore
subjected to the 95% phase compaction requirement. Increasing phase‐to‐phase clearances is a possible
design option that may be considered for long spans, at dead end structures (due to increased dead end
spacing needs), or when rolling to a horizontal configuration. However, electrical modeling of long
transmission lines has shown that the compact phase spacing is required for 90‐95% of the line length to
maintain the electrical benefits discussed previously. Setting the requirement at 95% will conservatively
ensure that the line will operate as intended. Deviation from this requirement would require additional
electrical modeling to ensure intended performance of the line is achieved.
Short lines, or lines which are thermally limited and not limited by voltage or stability considerations, are not
subject to the 95% phase compaction requirement. For these lines, the compact phase spacing should be
maintained for structure height minimization and aesthetic reasons, but the electrical performance will not
be affected by increasing the phase spacing in more than 5% of the line.
Galloping Criteria
For areas where galloping is either historically known to occur or is expected, the line engineer will need to
consider the potential for galloping in the design. Special consideration is required for BOLD projects due to
the compact phase spacing of the conductors.
Several galloping analysis methods are used in the transmission industry and the results of these different
methods can vary dramatically. Studies have shown that installing in‐span interphase insulators, or I3
insulators, can reduce the galloping magnitude by half [2]. Figure 12 shows a picture of a typical mid‐span
insulator. Depending on the project span lengths and galloping specifications, the line engineer has several
options to mitigate galloping concerns. The following mitigation options can be applied to lessen other
forms of conductor motion:
o
Decrease span lengths (also may allow narrower corridor, as discussed
in RoW considerations)
o
If only a few of the longer spans have excessive galloping ellipses, phase spacing can be
increased
on those spans only, keeping in mind the 95% compact spacing requirement
o
Install I
3
insulators at the time of initial construction
o
Install conductor with compact spacing and monitor performance over time; install I
3
insulators at a later date, if deemed necessary
o
Use anti‐galloping conductor