1
Investment Policy Statement Example
Overview
The Guidance for Developing an Investment Policy Statement, adopted by the Pension Review Board
(PRB), provides a description of policies and sections that systems are encouraged to include in their
investment policy statement (IPS), as applicable. This IPS example is an additional reference tool provided
by the PRB to demonstrate what each type of policy might look like in an IPS. Specific requirements
included below (including defined roles and responsibilities, defined percentages, etc.) are not
intended to be prescriptive but to help inform users about the types of elements that should be
included in an Investment Policy. In addition, Tthis document is not intended to be a fully functioning
IPS since certain policy sections have been shortened for brevity and each IPS should be tailored to each
system’s needs. Furthermore, this IPS example is not intended to replace any system’s existing IPS, but
systems may use it as a starting point of a new IPS or to develop new policy language to update an existing
policy.
This document contains example language from industry entities such as the Government Finance Officers
Association (GFOA) and the Chartered Financial Analyst Institute (CFAI). Specific references are provided
at the end of this document. The PRB also used policy language from actual IPS documents adopted by
several Texas public retirement systems including, but not limited to, the Texas Municipal Retirement
System (TMRS), Texas County and District Retirement System (TCDRS), Teacher Retirement System of
Texas (TRS), City of Austin Employees’ Retirement System (COAERS), Irving Firemen’s Relief and
Retirement Fund, Fort Worth Employees’ Retirement Fund, City of El Paso Employees Retirement Trust,
and Abilene Firemen’s Relief and Retirement Fund, among others. In addition, a glossary of common terms
used in IPS documents can be found at the end of this example IPS as an additional resource.
Example Language
I.
Fund Mission
The investment policy statement (IPS) governs the pension system investment program and is established
to provide a framework for management of those assets to conform with governing legislation and other
legal requirements. This IPS outlines the foundational beliefs, purpose, objectives, benchmarks,
restrictions, risks, and responsibilities of the board, staff, investment managers, service providers,
sponsoring entity, members, and other stakeholders in how they impact the investment program.
The board has a fiduciary duty to the members and beneficiaries of the system to prudently allocate
contributions from the sponsoring governmental entity and system members in accordance with the IPS
to pay future benefits. The investment program relies on incoming funds in accordance with the
established funding policy to meet a reasonable investment return assumption that matches future
benefits.
DRAFT
Investment Policy Statement Example
2
II.
Roles and Responsibilities
All parties involved in the investment program will act responsibly in accordance with their fiduciary
duty and standards of care.
1
Prudence: The standard of prudence to be used by investment officials shall be the Uniform Prudent
Investor Act standard and shall be applied in the context of managing an overall portfolio. Investment
officers acting in accordance with written procedures, this investment policy, and exercising due diligence,
shall be relieved of personal responsibility for an individual security's credit risk or market price changes,
provided deviations from expectations are reported in a timely fashion and the liquidity and the sale of
securities are carried out in accordance with the terms of this policy.
Ethics and Conflicts of Interest: Officers and employees involved in the investment process shall refrain
from personal business activity that could conflict with the proper execution and management of the
investment program, or that could impair their ability to make impartial decisions. Employees and
investment officials shall disclose any material interests in financial institutions with which they conduct
business, in accordance with applicable laws. They shall further disclose any personal financial or
investment positions that could be related to the performance of the investment portfolio. Trustees and
investment officials shall refrain from undertaking personal investment transactions with the same
individual with whom business is conducted on behalf of the system.
1.
The board of trustees is ultimately responsible for the administration of the system and its
investment program assets following governing statute and applicable law. The board
establishes investment objectives and policy, contracts with experts for advice and expertise,
oversees the distribution of benefit payments, actively monitors investment performance, and
as part of its fiduciary duty, ensures any delegated authority of investment assets are invested
in accordance with the Prudent Investor Act. The board’s fiduciary duty can be delegated to
service providers but the board is ultimately responsible for monitoring the investment program.
The board:
a.
Establishes the fund mission, investment objectives, and investment philosophy
consistent with the funding policy.
b.
Creates and maintains a written IPS consistent with the identified mission and objectives
and applicable laws.
c.
Approves an investment asset allocation that diversifies the assets to reduce risk of loss.
d.
Monitors and evaluates the system’s investment performance and compliance with
provisions outlined in the IPS or manager contracts and all applicable state or federal laws.
e.
Efficiently manages the costs associated with implementation of its investment program.
f.
Periodically reviews the performance of all service providers that directly report to the
board including investment staff, investment managers, investment consultants, and
custodians.
2.
The investment consultant is hired by, and reports to, the board. The consultant provides advice
and expertise on all investment-related matters, including:
a.
Developing investment objectives and relevant policies.
1
Sec. 802.203, Texas Government Code
DRAFT
Investment Policy Statement Example
3
b.
Determining optimal asset allocation targets and investment strategies.
c.
Leading investment manager searches, selection process, monitoring, and termination
following the policies outlined in the IPS.
d.
Providing monthly investment performance reports net of fees and liquidity status.
e.
Providing quarterly reviews of investment fees incurred.
f.
Providing the board with educational opportunities to improve trustees’ investment
knowledge.
g.
Reviewing the IPS annually and providing the board any suggestions for improvement.
3.
The investment managers are retained by the board to manage or advise on specific strategies
and asset classes, through a manager search process and according to specific criteria as set forth
in this IPS. The manager must be registered under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 and
remain in good standing with all applicable laws. Investment managers:
a.
Manage allocated assets in accordance with the policy guidelines and objectives as set
forth in the investment management agreement between the manager and the board.
b.
On a quarterly basis, provide a written report affirming compliance with the policy
guidelines and any separate written agreement with the board.
c.
On a quarterly basis, provide a report detailing the performance of allocated assets, a
forecast of the market and economy, and portfolio analysis of invested assets.
d.
Provide immediate written notice to the system of any significant market related or non-
market related event that has impacted or may impact investment objectives.
4.
The custodian bank serves as the master custodian of the system’s assets and is responsible for
maintaining the official book of record under the supervision of the board, calculating
investment performance, and using the system’s assets in accordance with the terms of a
separate agreement.
III.
Investment Objectives
The investment objective is to maximize the probability of achieving the actuarial return assumption
without exceeding the risk tolerance specified by the board. The actuarial consultant’s recommended
return assumption for the system should be created after consulting with the system’s investment
consultant to determine appropriate expectations surrounding long-term investment returns for a well-
diversified investment portfolio considering system future liabilities.
1. The investment assets nominal net of fee return should meet or exceed the return assumption
of 7 percent over a rolling five-year, 10-year, and 20-year period. The total fund portfolio
performance will be compared using the relative benchmarks and asset weights specified in the
IPS.
2. The actively managed investment performance should net return 1 percent alpha (excess
return over the specified benchmark).
IV.
Liquidity
DRAFT
Investment Policy Statement Example
4
The investment portfolio shall remain sufficiently liquid to meet all operating requirements that may be
reasonably anticipated. This is accomplished by structuring the portfolio so that securities mature
concurrent with cash needs to meet anticipated demands (static liquidity). Furthermore, since all possible
cash demands cannot be anticipated, the portfolio should consist largely of securities with active
secondary or resale markets (dynamic liquidity). Alternatively, a portion of the portfolio may be placed in
money market mutual funds or local government investment pools which offer same-day liquidity for
short-term funds.
The investment consultant is responsible for monitoring and providing a liquidity report monthly to the
board. As liquidity can vary by asset class and investment vehicle, the board shall limit portfolio asset
investments based on redemption periods. The consultant will provide notice of known distribution
liquidity needs to the investment managers in advance.
1. No more than 60 percent of the portfolio can be invested in vehicles that provide liquidity on a
greater than annual basis.
2. No more than 20 percent of the portfolio can be invested in vehicles that provide liquidity on a
greater than three-year lock-up period.
V.
Risk Tolerance
The investment consultant will establish a framework for measuring the total fund portfolio and
specifically the policy benchmarks for asset classes and investment managers. At a minimum, this
framework must include a quantitative risk assessment for downside risk (e.g., value-at-risk (VaR),
estimated shortfall, or various parametric and non-parametric statistics).
Investments shall be undertaken in a manner that seeks to ensure the preservation of capital in the overall
portfolio. The objective will be to mitigate market risk, credit risk, inflation risk, and interest rate risk.
These risk factors are further evaluated and discussed in the routinely conducted asset allocation and
asset liability studies.
1. Market Risk
The system will minimize market risk, which is the risk that prices for stocks, bonds, and other
assets may fall, by:
Limiting investments to the types of securities listed in Section VI of this investment policy.
Pre-qualifying and conducting ongoing due diligence of the financial institutions,
broker/dealers, intermediaries, and advisers with which the system will do business in
accordance with Section VI.
Diversifying the investment portfolio so that the impact of potential losses from any one type
of security or from any one individual issuer will be minimized.
2. Credit Risk
The system will minimize credit risk, which is the risk of loss of all or part of the investment due to
the failure of the security issuer or backer, by:
Limiting investments to the types of securities listed in Section VI of this investment policy.
Pre-qualifying and conducting ongoing due diligence of the financial institutions,
DRAFT
Investment Policy Statement Example
5
broker/dealers, intermediaries, and advisers with which the system will do business in
accordance with Section VI.
Requiring a minimum credit quality for certain investments and counterparties in accordance
with Section VI.
Diversifying the investment portfolio so that the impact of potential losses from any one type
of security or from any one individual issuer will be minimized.
3. Interest Rate Risk
The system will minimize interest rate risk, which is the risk that rising of falling interest rates will
reduce the value of the system’s assets, by:
Structuring the investment portfolio so that security maturities match cash requirements for
ongoing operations, thereby avoiding the need to sell securities on the open market prior to
maturity
Investing operating funds primarily in shorter-term securities, money market mutual funds, or
similar investment pools and limiting individual security maturity as well as the average
maturity of the portfolio in accordance with this policy.
VI.
Investment Assets
The board recognizes that the asset allocation decision will be the single most important factor
determining the long-term performance of the fund. The board therefore wishes to retain complete
discretion with respect to the asset allocation decision. Investment managers are expected to manage the
funds for which they have been allocated at their discretion within the constraints of their mandates.
The current needs of the fund require a diversified portfolio, and the asset allocation percentages
specified in this section are determined by the board as the optimal allocation for the fund. The
determination of the optimal allocation is reviewed annually and is based on the advice of the investment
consultant and available asset-liability studies. thatThis should be performed generally every 3-5 years or
after consulting with the actuary and investment consultant for appropriateness. The fund’s time horizon
is long-term, and the allocation considers the various preferences, risk tolerances, return objective, and
the desired diversification from this IPS.
Strategic Asset Allocation
Asset Class
Minimum
Range
Target
Maximum
Range
Public Equity
40%
50%
60%
Fixed
Income
15%
30%
40%
Real Assets
5%
10%
15%
Alternative Investments
5%
10%
15%
Cash
0%
0%
5%
Rebalancing Policy
The goal of the rebalancing policy is to maintain the board-approved strategic allocation and its risk-to-
return profile. The board has delegated rebalancing to the investment consultant which will review
allocation levels for rebalancing at least quarterly.
DRAFT
Investment Policy Statement Example
6
Authorized Investments
1. Public Equity
a.
Investments in public equity securities must be traded on a national exchange or electronic
network.
b.
No more than 5 percent of the system’s total assets may be invested in the common stock, capital
stock or convertible stock of any single issuing company. Additionally, the aggregate investment
in any single company shall not exceed 5 percent of the outstanding capital stock of that company.
c.
Investable options:
i. Index fund, mutual fund, common stocks, exchange traded funds (ETFs), preferred
stocks, or broad market benchmarks
ii. Active and passive commingled funds
iii. Separately managed accounts for actively managed, rules-based, passively
managed, or custom strategies.
iv. Other equity instruments including exchange-traded futures, options, or other
derivatives are permitted only with approval from the board.
2. Fixed Income
a.
Domestic and Yankee Bonds, mortgages and mortgage-backed securities, asset-backed securities,
global corporate bonds, global sovereign debt, fixed income futures, interest rate futures.
b.
No more than 5 percent of the fund’ total assets may be invested in the securities of any single
corporate issuer.
c.
All securities must be rated at least B- or equivalent.
d.
Competitive bids shall be obtained from at least three brokers or financial institutions on all
purchases and sales of investment instruments transacted on the secondary market if possible.
3. Real Assets
a.
Inflation-linked securities, commodities, REITS, real estate, listed infrastructure, natural
resources.
4. Alternative Investments
a.
Private equity, hedge funds, private real estate
5. Cash
a.
Custodian bank STIF vehicles, AAA rated money market mutual funds, US Treasuries with maturity
less than 365 days.
Alternative Investment Legal Requirements
Due to the unique nature of alternative investments, all investment entry documents, and any
accompanying side letters will be reviewed by the system’s contracted legal counsel to determine if the
documents are sufficient for the system’s legal requirements and needs. An alternative investment may
not be made if certain legal requirements cannot be satisfied and the system is not willing to assume the
legal exposure.
Alternative Valuation Policy
Due to certain alternative investment pricing limitations and complexities, the board will delegate to the
investment consultant confirmation of compliance with industry best practice valuation procedures on an
annual basis.
DRAFT
Investment Policy Statement Example
7
For all real estate investments, the investment consultant will confirm compliance with industry best
practices. These investments should preferably have quarterly valuations, but valuations must be
conducted no less than semi-annually. Exceptions to this policy can be approved by the board, such as for
non-stabilized properties which include but are not limited to those under construction or renovation as
well as land held for future expansion or entitlement. Because of the complexity and uniqueness of each
alternative investment, the policies below are not all inclusive and the investment consultant may identify
additional policies according to their expertise that will be maintained as an external document to the IPS
available to the board.
1. Valuation Requirements The scope must be sufficient to demonstrate that the value of each
property held has been appropriately determined. The scope should include, but not be limited,
to the following:
a.
Must have and follow their own written valuation policies.
b.
Must notify the system in writing if the internal valuation policy is changed.
c.
Must be appropriate, established valuation techniques.
d.
Valuation process oversight, review, and approval must be independent of the portfolio
manager with approval so documented.
e.
Sufficient documentation for real estate auditors to recompute the calculations during audit.
f.
Reconciliation of any significant variance from the previous appraisal.
VII.
Proxy Voting
The board by default does not intend to invest in investment vehicles that provide proxy voting rights;
however, when applicable, the investment manager is granted the authority to represent the system and
shall vote shares in the best interest of the fund and its beneficiaries. A listing of all proxy votes showing
the date each proxy was voted, the issue as to which each proxy was voted, and how each proxy was
voted shall be provided to the board upon request within a reasonable timeframeat least annually. If a
proxy was not voted, the investment manager will provide a written statement indicating the reason that
a particular proxy was not voted to the board as soon as reasonably practicable.
VIII.
Performance Evaluation
Performance measurement will be based on total rate of return and will be monitored over a sufficient
period to reflect the investment expertise of the manager(s) over one full market cycle, or five years,
whichever is less. Performance results and evaluation relative to objectives will be reported to the board
on a quarterly basis. A time-weighted return formula (which minimizes the effect of contributions and
withdrawals) will be utilized in performance calculations. For alternatives, time-weighted returns will be
used for consolidated reporting; however, internal rates of return and comparison to relevant peer groups
and vintages will be used for evaluation of managers.
Asset Class Benchmarks
Asset Class
Policy Benchmark
Asset Class Goal
Target
Public Equity
MSCI ACWI IMI (Net)
Benchmark
50%
DRAFT
Investment Policy Statement Example
8
Fixed Income
Bloomberg Barclays US Aggregate
Bond Index
Benchmark 30%
Real Assets
Real Estate – (NCREIF-ODCE Index)
Real Assets – (Rollup of underlying
manager benchmarks)
Real Estate
(CPI+5%)
Real Assets –
(CPI+4%)
10%
Alternative Investments
Hedge Funds
(HFRI FoF)
Private Equity – (Rollup of
underlying manager benchmarks)
Russel 3000 + 3% 10%
Cash
30
-
Day
T
-
Bill
Benchmark
0%
Marking to Market
The market value of the portfolio shall be calculated at least quarterly [or monthly] and a statement of
the market value of the portfolio shall be issued at least quarterly [or monthly]. This will ensure that
review of the investment portfolio, in terms of value and price volatility, has been performed consistent
with the GFOA Recommended Practice on "Mark-to-Market Practices for State and Local Government
Investment Portfolios and Investment Pools." In defining market value, considerations should be given
to the GASB Statement 31 pronouncement.
Quarterly Report
Each quarter, the investment consultant will prepare a report that compares the performance of the
total investment fund against the benchmarks for the preceding quarter, fiscal year-to-date and
annualized periods. The report shall provide the current allocation to each strategy and asset class. The
report will also provide a synopsis of the performance of each active manager and a list of currently
scheduled commitments or redemptions, if any, as well as any activity for the preceding quarter.
Performance attribution analysis shall be provided that will show the impact of any asset class
divergences over the past quarter and year as well as the performance of active managers.
The investment consultant should provide the report to the board and any investment committee. The
report will include the following:
1. Listing of individual securities held at the end of the reporting period including type, acquisition
cost, book cost, and market value.
2. Realized and unrealized gains or losses resulting from appreciation or depreciation by listing the
cost and market value of securities over one-year duration that are not intended to be held until
maturity (in accordance with Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) requirements).
3. Average weighted return on investments as compared to applicable benchmarks.
4. Percentage of the total portfolio which each type of investment represents.
5. A statement that the investment portfolio is compliant with the investment policy and is meeting
the investment policy objectives.
Investment Expenses
Each quarter, the investment consultant will prepare a report that reviews both the direct and indirect
expenses against relevant benchmarks and peers for the preceding quarter, fiscal year-to-date and one-
year. Total fund expenses compared to peers will be reviewed annually with recommendations for
DRAFT
Investment Policy Statement Example
9
improvements or confirmation of reasonable expenses.
The report must show each investment’s expenses, both direct and indirect, accrued or estimated for
the applicable period if available and not cost prohibitive. Alternative investments will show the most
recent incurred expenses. Investments are allowed to be aggregated into asset classes if approved by
the board. The expenses incurred must be aggregated based on the type of fee incurred (e.g.,
management fee paid from trust, management fee netted from returns, commission/brokerage fees,
and profit share carried interest) and by asset class. The investment consultant should raise any
concerns about fee tracking, complexity, and any cost prohibitive concerns with the board so that
performance and expenses are adequately tracked in a cost effective manner.
IX.
Investment Manager Selection and Monitoring
To better ensure that managers will successfully manage to the system’s objectives for their specific
mandates, the board supports disciplined processes for manager selection, monitoring, watch list, and
termination. In addition, the manager selection process is intended to protect against unethical behavior
including bribery and corruption and contact between the board and managers during the search process
that is related to the pending selection and intended to influence the search outcome. Contact will be
limited during the search process and directed through the investment consultant or third-party provider
assisting in the investment manager search. Direct inquiries by managers to individual board members
regarding the investment program will be referred to the investment consultant. As the investment needs
of the system are ever-changing, so are the criteria appropriate for the selection of investment managers.
Additional criteria and/or amendments to these criteria may be made by the board when appropriate.
Investment Manager Selection Criteria
1. Manager candidates should have a real-time performance record of five years or more for the
specific investment product that the system is seeking. However, recognizing that past
performance is not indicative of future results and the fact that attractive opportunities may be
available without this target, qualitative exceptions to this rule may be adopted by the board.
2. Manager candidates must have demonstrated a long-term record of superior performance.
3. Manager candidates must have registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
(SEC) as investment advisors or be exempt from registration.
4. Manager candidates should have a material amount of assets under management for that specific
investment product unless a waiver is authorized by the board.
Alternative Investment Manager Selection Criteria
1. The general partners or sponsors of alternative investment funds must possess the management
skill and industry knowledge to exercise influence or have an impact on the portfolio companies
that the funds invest.
2. The contract terms must not grossly favor the general partners over the limited partners
(investors).
3. Capital commitment by the general partners should be significant.
DRAFT
Investment Policy Statement Example
10
Watch List
A manager retention decision is very important to the continued success of a pension system’s
investment strategy. The Watch List Policy applies to managers in the following asset classes: public
equities, fixed income, and real assets. The watch list may not necessarily lead to any needed action
but rather is intended to place a manager under increased scrutiny based on failure to meet
quantitative or qualitative standards.
Quantitative Factors Resulting in Watch List Additions
Several factors may contribute to a manager’s over- or under-performance at any given time, such as:
market dynamics, investment skill, and/or pure chance. Given this uncertainty, it is unwise to mandate
termination purely for lagging performance at any specific point. The following represent guidelines to
be used in making a recommendation to the Board with regards to placing a traditional asset class
manager on the watch list:
Test 1 If the manager’s rolling, five-year return (net of fees) falls below the rolling, five-year
benchmark return for three consecutive quarters.
Test 2 If the manager’s rolling, five-year return (net of fees) for three consecutive quarters ranks
in the bottom third of the investment consultant’s peer group universe.
At the discretion of the board, a manager may be included on the watch list based on these criteria.
The board may place the manager on the watch list at any time. Once a manager is placed on the watch
list for performance reasons, performance will be closely monitored and scrutinized. All the qualitative
criteria should be reviewed along with an explanation of the underperformance from the manager.
Additional actions could include meetings with the manager and a formal re-interview of the manager
by the board.
The manager will continue to be closely monitored during the watch list period and will remain under
scrutiny until the board and investment consultant agree that the quantitative and qualitative criteria
for removal from the watch list have been satisfied. Generally, one period of a rolling, five -ear return
above the benchmark or above the bottom third of the investment consultant’s peer group universe
following placement on the watch list will be required for a manager’s removal from the watch list for
performance reasons. The observation process will at this point begin again.
Qualitative Factors Resulting in Watch List Additions
A significant and potentially adverse event related, but not limited, to any of the following qualitative
issues or events, will be considered a reason to add the manager to the watch list. Examples include,
but are not limited to, these events:
Violation of investment guidelines
Deviation from stated investment style and/or shifts in the firm’s philosophy or process
Turnover of one or more key personnel
Change in firm ownership or structure
Significant loss of clients and/or assets under management
DRAFT
Investment Policy Statement Example
11
Significant and persistent lack of responsiveness to client requests
Litigation
Failure to disclose significant information, including potential conflicts of interest
Chronic violations of the system’s investment policy
Any other issue or situation of which the board, the investment consultant and/or trustees become
aware that is deemed material
Should any of these events occur, the recommended courses of action are similar to those contained in
the preceding subsection (Quantitative Factors Resulting in Watch List Additions). After an assessment
of the nature of the problem or potential problem, the investment consultant should then make a
recommendation as to the appropriate course of action at the meeting after notification for the board
to make a final determination of any action to take.
Because of the subjective nature of qualitative analysis, both additions and removals to and from the
list should be handled by the investment consultant and the board on a case-by-case basis.
Active Monitoring Approach
The board in consultation with the investment consultant will review periodically on the investment
monitoring approach using a watch list vs. other potential options such as active monitoring.
X.
Ethics
The board recognizes the responsibility and fiduciary duty it has to the members and beneficiaries of the
system and requires all trustees, service providers, and fiduciaries to the system to always act ethically in
accordance with the system’s external Ethics Policy.
DRAFT
Investment Policy Statement Example
12
XI.
Glossary And Resources
Active Management A process employed by the system to produce better returns than those of
passively managed indexed funds by use of, for example, investment managers, investment advisors,
ETFs, or TAA, which typically rely on analytical research, quantitative models, forecast, regime analysis,
judgment and experience in making investment decisions.
Asset Liability Management Study (ALM Study)A comprehensive periodic study commissioned by the
board to examine various aspects of the system’s assets and liabilities including, but not limited to, asset
allocation and investment strategies along with key asset and liability risk exposures.
Cash (Cash and Cash Equivalents) An asset class characterized by liquidity of one year or less and
described in greater detail in Section VI of this IPS as an investment category.
Commingled Fund An investment fund consisting of assets from several accounts, which may include
non-system accounts, that are blended so investors may benefit from economies of scale, lower trading
cost, and diversification. Commingled funds are not publicly traded.
Exchange-Traded Fund (ETF) A marketable security that tracks an index, a commodity, bonds, or a
basket of assets like an index fund, and can be traded like a common stock on an exchange.
Fiscal Year (FY) – The period unique to the system for annual reports.
Investment Management Agreement (IMA) – A formal agreement between an investment manager and
the system stipulating the terms under which the investment manager is authorized to act on behalf of
the system to manage the assets listed in the agreement. The agreement establishes the extent to which
the investment manager may act in a discretionary capacity to make investment decisions based on a
prescribed strategy.
Investment Manager An entity that manages system assets, usually in a separately managed account,
with discretionary authority to invest within the confines of a system-mandated investment strategy or
similar system directive, and where the account holdings are typically maintained in the custody of the
fund’s custodian bank.
Investment Policy Statement (IPS) The investment policy statement of the system as approved by the
board/investment committee that provides for the system’s general investment goals and objectives.
Investment Program (IP) A system for the investment and administration of the system’s assets as
outlined in the system’s IPS and all applicable laws and regulations.
Internal Rate of Return (IRR) – The annual rate of growth for an investment that nets all expected future
cash flows to zero. Often used in alternative investments that have large cash outflows during the
beginning of the investment cycle with expected return distributions experienced in the future.
Market-Based Strategies Investment strategies which are traded on public markets and are based on
publicly traded securities. Market based strategies are highly liquid and valued daily.
Net Asset Value (NAV) Market value per unit of the investment vehicle. For public markets, market
value is determined daily. For private investments, market value is estimated periodically.
Passive Management (Indexing) The process of buying and holding a well-diversified portfolio designed
to produce substantially the same returns as a specified market index.
Peer Group – A set of investors (funds or managers) whose returns are used for a comparison with those
of a given fund to determine how the given fund ranks among similar funds.
DRAFT
Investment Policy Statement Example
13
Performance Appraisal The part of the performance evaluation process that attempts to determine
whether the investment returns over an evaluation period have been achieved by skill or luck.
Performance Attribution The part of the performance evaluation process that identifies sources of
returns for a portfolio relative to a designated benchmark over an evaluation period.
Performance Evaluation A component of the investment process involving periodic analysis of how a
portfolio performed in terms of both returns earned and risks incurred.
Performance Measurement The part of the performance evaluation process that calculates a portfolio’s
rate of return over an evaluation period.
Policy BenchmarkThe specific standards against which the performance of securities held by the fund
in certain asset classes can be measured. The specific benchmarks are detailed under Section VI -
Investment Assets.
Private Investment Strategies in which the system invests (typically through an interest in a limited
partnership, limited liability company, or through some other binding agreement) in private equity, debt,
real assets, or other assets not listed on a public exchange.
Risk Appetite – The amount of risk that the system is willing to take to meet its strategic objectives.
Risk Factors – Underlying characteristics of the portfolio that define risk, return and correlation.
Risk ToleranceThe degree of variability of investment returns relative to the assigned benchmark that
the system is willing to accept.
Sharpe ratio A risk-adjusted measure of portfolio performance in which risk is measured by the standard
deviation of the portfolio’s returns. It is the annualized ratio of the excess return (the actual return less
the risk-free return) of the portfolio divided by the portfolio’s standard deviation over a specified period.
Strategic Asset Allocation (SAA) A portfolio strategy that sets long term target allocations for various
asset classes and includes periodic rebalancing to maintain these allocations.
Tactical Asset Allocation (TAA)A portfolio strategy that shifts, for a short period of time, the percentage
of assets held in various allocation categories to capitalize or manage risk on market or economic
environments.
Time Weighted Return (TWR) A method for calculating investment returns such as an annualized return
using the geometric mean of returns each year over a specified period.
Tracking Error A measure of deviation between a portfolio’s return and the benchmark or index it was
meant to mimic or beat.
Reference Materials
Chartered Financial Analyst Institute (CFAI) Materials
J Bailey and T Richards,. A Primer for Investment Trustees: Understanding Investment Committee
Responsibilities (2017).
D Chambers, K Black, and N Lacey, Alternative Investments: A Primer for Investment Professionals (2018).
M Drew and A Walk, Investment Governance for Fiduciaries (2019).
Scott Stewart, Manager Selection (2013).
Government Financial Officers Association (GFOA) Materials
DRAFT
Investment Policy Statement Example
14
GFOA Best Practice, Adopting Financial Policies (Sept. 30, 2015).
https://www.gfoa.org/materials/adopting-financial-policies
- GFOA Best Practice, Investment Policies for Defined Benefit Plans (Sept. 30, 2017).
https://www.gfoa.org/materials/investment-policies-for-defined-benefit-plans
- GFOA Best Practice, Investment Fee Guidelines for External Management of Defined Benefit Plans
(Sept. 28. 2018). https://www.gfoa.org/materials/investment-fee-guidelines
- GFOA Alternative Investments Checklist
- GFOA Sample Investment Policy
DRAFT