Denosumab (Prolia
®
& Xgeva
®
)
Page 1 of 22
UnitedHealthcare Commercial Medical Benefit Drug Policy
Effective 04/01/2024
Proprietary Information of UnitedHealthcare. Copyright 2024 United HealthCare Services, Inc.
UnitedHealthcare
®
Commercial
Medical
Benefit
Drug
Policy
Denosumab (Prolia
®
& Xgeva
®
)
Policy Number: 2024D0068N
Effective Date: April 1, 2024
Instructions for Use
Table of Contents Page
Coverage Rationale ....................................................................... 1
Applicable Codes .......................................................................... 5
Background.................................................................................. 17
Benefit Considerations ................................................................ 17
Clinical Evidence ......................................................................... 17
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services ........................... 21
U.S. Food and Drug Administration ........................................... 20
References ................................................................................... 21
Policy History/Revision Information ........................................... 22
Instructions for Use ..................................................................... 22
Coverage Rationale
See Benefit Considerations
This policy refers to the following denosumab products:
Prolia
®
Xgeva
®
Prolia (Denosumab)
Prolia is proven for the treatment of postmenopausal patients with osteoporosis or to increase bone mass in patients
with osteoporosis at high risk for fracture when all of the following criteria are met:
Initial Therapy
o Diagnosis of osteoporosis; and
o Patient is at high risk for fracture (e.g., history of osteoporotic fracture, multiple risk factors for fracture, patients who
have failed or are intolerant to other available osteoporosis therapy); and
o Dosing is in accordance with the United States Food and Drug Administration approved labeling; and
o Authorization is for no more than 12 months
Reauthorization/Continuation of Care Criteria
o Documentation of positive clinical response to therapy; and
o Dosing is in accordance with the United States Food and Drug Administration approved labeling; and
o Authorization is for no more than 12 months
Prolia is proven to treat glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis in patients at high risk for fracture when all of the following
criteria are met:
Initial Therapy
o Diagnosis of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis; and
o Patient is at high risk for fracture (e.g., history of osteoporotic fracture, multiple risk factors for fracture, patients who
have failed or are intolerant to other available osteoporosis therapy); and
o Dosing is in accordance with the United States Food and Drug Administration approved labeling; and
Community Plan Policy
Denosumab (Prolia
®
& Xgeva
®
)
Denosumab (Prolia
®
& Xgeva
®
)
Page 2 of 22
UnitedHealthcare Commercial Medical Benefit Drug Policy
Effective 04/01/2024
Proprietary Information of UnitedHealthcare. Copyright 2024 United HealthCare Services, Inc.
o Authorization is for no more than 12 months
Reauthorization/Continuation of Care Criteria
o Documentation of positive clinical response to therapy; and
o Dosing is in accordance with the United States Food and Drug Administration approved labeling; and
o Authorization is for no more than 12 months
Prolia is proven to increase bone mass in patients at high risk for fracture receiving androgen deprivation therapy for
non-metastatic prostate cancer. Prolia is medically necessary when all of the following criteria are met:
Initial Therapy
o Diagnosis of non-metastatic prostate cancer; and
o Patient is receiving androgen deprivation therapy; and
o One of the following (for Medicare reviews, refer to the CMS section):
Both of the following:
History of intolerance to oral bisphosphonate therapy; and
History of failure, contraindication, or intolerance to intravenous (IV) bisphosphonate therapy (e.g.,
pamidronate, zoledronic acid)
or
History of failure or contraindication to oral bisphosphonate therapy; or
History of failure, contraindication, or intolerance to IV bisphosphonate therapy
and
o Dosing is in accordance with the United States Food and Drug Administration approved labeling; and
o Authorization is for no more than 12 months
Reauthorization/Continuation of Care Criteria
o Patient is receiving androgen deprivation therapy; and
o Documentation of positive clinical response to therapy; and
o Dosing is in accordance with the United States Food and Drug Administration approved labeling; and
o Authorization is for no more than 12 months
Prolia is proven to treat patients at high risk for fracture receiving adjuvant aromatase inhibitor therapy for breast cancer.
Prolia is medically necessary when all of the following criteria are met:
Initial Therapy
o Diagnosis of breast cancer; and
o Patient is receiving aromatase inhibitor therapy; and
o One of the following (for Medicare reviews, refer to the CMS section):
Both of the following:
History of intolerance to oral bisphosphonate therapy; and
History of failure, contraindication, or intolerance to intravenous (IV) bisphosphonate therapy (e.g.,
pamidronate, zoledronic acid)
or
History of failure or contraindication to oral bisphosphonate therapy; or
History of failure, contraindication, or intolerance to IV bisphosphonate therapy
and
o Dosing is in accordance with the United States Food and Drug Administration approved labeling; and
o Authorization is for no more than 12 months
Reauthorization/Continuation of Care Criteria
o Patient is receiving aromatase inhibitor therapy; and
o Documentation of positive clinical response to therapy; and
o Dosing is in accordance with the United States Food and Drug Administration approved labeling; and
o Authorization is for no more than 12 months
Xgeva (Denosumab)
Xgeva is proven for the prevention of skeletal-related events in patients with multiple myeloma and with bone metastases
from solid tumors. Xgeva is medically necessary when all of the following criteria are met:
Initial Therapy
Denosumab (Prolia
®
& Xgeva
®
)
Page 3 of 22
UnitedHealthcare Commercial Medical Benefit Drug Policy
Effective 04/01/2024
Proprietary Information of UnitedHealthcare. Copyright 2024 United HealthCare Services, Inc.
o Patient is one of the following:
Patient is ≥ 18 years of age
Patient is a skeletally mature adolescent as defined by having at least 1 mature long bone (e.g., closed epiphyseal
growth plate of the humerus)
and
o One of the following:
Diagnosis of multiple myeloma
Presence of metastatic disease secondary to a solid tumor (e.g., bladder, breast, kidney, lung, ovarian, thyroid,
etc.)
and
o Individual has an expected survival of 3 months or greater; and
o Refractory (within the past 30 days), contraindication (including renal insufficiency), or intolerance to treatment with
intravenous bisphosphonate therapy (e.g., pamidronate, zoledronic acid) (for Medicare reviews, refer to the CMS
section); and
o Dosing is in accordance with the United States Food and Drug Administration approved labeling; and
o Authorization is for no more than 12 months
Reauthorization/Continuation of Care Criteria
o Individual has an expected survival of 3 months or greater; and
o Documentation of positive clinical response to therapy; and
o Dosing is in accordance with the United States Food and Drug Administration approved labeling; and
o Authorization is for no more than 12 months
Xgeva is proven for the treatment of giant cell tumor of the bone. Xgeva is medically necessary when all of the following
criteria are met:
Initial Therapy
o Patient is one of the following:
Patient is ≥ 18 years of age
Patient is a skeletally mature adolescent as defined by having at least 1 mature long bone (e.g., closed epiphyseal
growth plate of the humerus)
and
o Diagnosis of localized, recurrent, or metastatic giant cell tumor of the bone; and
o Disease is one of the following:
Unresectable
Surgical resection is likely to result in severe morbidity
and
o Dosing is in accordance with the United States Food and Drug Administration approved labeling; and
o Authorization is for no more than 12 months
Reauthorization/Continuation of Care Criteria
o Documentation of positive clinical response to therapy; and
o Dosing is in accordance with the United States Food and Drug Administration approved labeling; and
o Authorization is for no more than 12 months
Xgeva is proven for the treatment of hypercalcemia of malignancy. Xgeva is medically necessary when all of the following
criteria are met:
Initial Therapy
o Patient is one of the following:
Patient is ≥ 18 years of age; or
Patient is a skeletally mature adolescent as defined by having at least 1 mature long bone (e.g., closed epiphyseal
growth plate of the humerus)
and
o Diagnosis of hypercalcemia of malignancy (i.e., albumin-corrected serum calcium level greater than 12.5 mg/dL); and
o No pre-existing hypocalcemia (i.e., serum calcium or corrected calcium within normal limits per laboratory reference);
and
Denosumab (Prolia
®
& Xgeva
®
)
Page 4 of 22
UnitedHealthcare Commercial Medical Benefit Drug Policy
Effective 04/01/2024
Proprietary Information of UnitedHealthcare. Copyright 2024 United HealthCare Services, Inc.
o Refractory (within the past 30 days), contraindication (including renal insufficiency), or intolerance to treatment with
intravenous bisphosphonate therapy (e.g., pamidronate, zoledronic acid); and
o Dosing is in accordance with the United States Food and Drug Administration approved labeling; and
o Authorization is for no more than 12 months
Reauthorization/Continuation of Care Criteria
o Documentation of positive clinical response to therapy; and
o Dosing is in accordance with the United States Food and Drug Administration approved labeling; and
o Authorization is for no more than 12 months
Xgeva is proven for the prevention of skeletal-related events in men with castration-resistant prostate cancer who have
bone metastases. Xgeva is medically necessary for the prevention of skeletal-related events in men with castration-
resistant prostate cancer who have bone metastases when all of the following criteria are met:
Initial Therapy
o Diagnosis of castration-resistant prostate cancer; and
o Presence of metastatic bone disease; and
o Refractory (within the past 30 days), contraindication (including renal insufficiency), or intolerance to treatment with
intravenous bisphosphonate therapy (e.g., pamidronate, zoledronic acid) (for Medicare reviews, refer to the CMS
section); and
o Dosing is in accordance with the United States Food and Drug Administration approved labeling; and
o Authorization is for no more than 12 months
Reauthorization/Continuation of Care Criteria
o Documentation of positive clinical response to therapy; and
o Dosing is in accordance with the United States Food and Drug Administration approved labeling; and
o Authorization is for no more than 12 months
Xgeva is proven for treatment of osteopenia/osteoporosis in patients with systemic mastocytosis with bone pain not
responding to bisphosphonates. Xgeva is medically necessary for the treatment of osteopenia/osteoporosis in patients
with systemic mastocytosis with bone pain not responding to bisphosphonates when all of the following criteria are met:
Initial Therapy
o Diagnosis of systemic mastocytosis; and
o Patient has bone pain; and
o Diagnosis of osteoporosis or osteopenia; and Refractory (within the past 30 days), contraindication (including renal
insufficiency), or intolerance to treatment with intravenous bisphosphonate therapy (e.g., pamidronate, zoledronic acid)
(for Medicare reviews, refer to the CMS section); and
o Dosing is in accordance with the United States Food and Drug Administration approved labeling; and
o Authorization for no more than 12 months
Reauthorization/Continuation of Care Criteria
For patients currently on Xgeva for the treatment of osteopenia/osteoporosis in patients with systemic mastocytosis with
bone pain not responding to bisphosphonates, continued use will be approved based on the following criteria:
o Documentation of positive clinical response to therapy; and
o Dosing is in accordance with the United States Food and Drug Administration approved labeling; and
o Authorization is for no more than 12 months
Unproven/Not Medically Necessary
Denosumab is unproven and not medically necessary for the following indications:
Combination therapy of denosumab and intravenous bisphosphonates
Bone loss associated with hormone-ablation therapy (other than aromatase inhibitors) in breast/prostate cancer
Cancer pain
Central giant cell granuloma
Hyper-parathyroidism
Immobilization hypercalcemia
Osteogenesis imperfecta
Osteopenia
Denosumab (Prolia
®
& Xgeva
®
)
Page 5 of 22
UnitedHealthcare Commercial Medical Benefit Drug Policy
Effective 04/01/2024
Proprietary Information of UnitedHealthcare. Copyright 2024 United HealthCare Services, Inc.
Applicable Codes
The following list(s) of procedure and/or diagnosis codes is provided for reference purposes only and may not be all inclusive.
Listing of a code in this policy does not imply that the service described by the code is a covered or non-covered health service.
Benefit coverage for health services is determined by the member specific benefit plan document and applicable laws that may
require coverage for a specific service. The inclusion of a code does not imply any right to reimbursement or guarantee claim
payment. Other Policies and Guidelines may apply.
HCPCS Code
Description
J0897
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg
Description
Prolia
Malignant neoplasm of prostate
Secondary malignant neoplasm of breast
Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, unspecified site, initial encounter for fracture
M80.00XD
Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, unspecified site, subsequent encounter for
fracture with routine healing
M80.00XG Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, unspecified site, subsequent encounter for
fracture with delayed healing
M80.00XK
Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, unspecified site, subsequent encounter for
fracture with nonunion
M80.00XP Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, unspecified site, subsequent encounter for
fracture with malunion
Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, unspecified site, sequela
Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, other site, initial encounter for fracture
M80.0AXD Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, other site, subsequent encounter for
fracture with routine healing
M80.0AXG
Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, other site, subsequent encounter for
fracture with delayed healing
M80.0AXK Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, other site, subsequent encounter for
fracture with nonunion
M80.0AXP
Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, other site, subsequent encounter for
fracture with malunion
Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, other site, sequela
Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, right shoulder, initial encounter for fracture
M80.011D Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, right shoulder, subsequent encounter for
fracture with routine healing
M80.011G Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, right shoulder, subsequent encounter for
fracture with delayed healing
M80.011K Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, right shoulder, subsequent encounter for
fracture with nonunion
M80.011P Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, right shoulder, subsequent encounter for
fracture with malunion
Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, right shoulder, sequela
Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, left shoulder, initial encounter for fracture
M80.012D
Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, left shoulder, subsequent encounter for
fracture with routine healing
Denosumab (Prolia
®
& Xgeva
®
)
Page 6 of 22
UnitedHealthcare Commercial Medical Benefit Drug Policy
Effective 04/01/2024
Proprietary Information of UnitedHealthcare. Copyright 2024 United HealthCare Services, Inc.
Description
Prolia
M80.012G Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, left shoulder, subsequent encounter for
fracture with delayed healing
M80.012K Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, left shoulder, subsequent encounter for
fracture with nonunion
M80.012P Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, left shoulder, subsequent encounter for
fracture with malunion
Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, left shoulder, sequela
M80.019A Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, unspecified shoulder, initial encounter for
fracture
M80.019D
Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, unspecified shoulder, subsequent
encounter for fracture with routine healing
M80.019G Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, unspecified shoulder, subsequent
encounter for fracture with delayed healing
M80.019K
Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, unspecified shoulder, subsequent
encounter for fracture with nonunion
M80.019P Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, unspecified shoulder, subsequent
encounter for fracture with malunion
Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, unspecified shoulder, sequela
Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, right humerus, initial encounter for fracture
M80.021D Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, right humerus, subsequent encounter for
fracture with routine healing
M80.021G Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, right humerus, subsequent encounter for
fracture with delayed healing
M80.021K Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, right humerus, subsequent encounter for
fracture with nonunion
M80.021P Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, right humerus, subsequent encounter for
fracture with malunion
Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, right humerus, sequela
Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, left humerus, initial encounter for fracture
M80.022D Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, left humerus, subsequent encounter for
fracture with routine healing
M80.022G
Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, left humerus, subsequent encounter for
fracture with delayed healing
M80.022K Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, left humerus, subsequent encounter for
fracture with nonunion
M80.022P
Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, left humerus, subsequent encounter for
fracture with malunion
Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, left humerus, sequela
M80.029A Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, unspecified humerus, initial encounter for
fracture
M80.029D Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, unspecified humerus, subsequent
encounter for fracture with routine healing
M80.029G Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, unspecified humerus, subsequent
encounter for fracture with delayed healing
Denosumab (Prolia
®
& Xgeva
®
)
Page 7 of 22
UnitedHealthcare Commercial Medical Benefit Drug Policy
Effective 04/01/2024
Proprietary Information of UnitedHealthcare. Copyright 2024 United HealthCare Services, Inc.
Description
Prolia
M80.029K Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, unspecified humerus, subsequent
encounter for fracture with nonunion
M80.029P Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, unspecified humerus, subsequent
encounter for fracture with malunion
Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, unspecified humerus, sequela
Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, right forearm, initial encounter for fracture
M80.031D Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, right forearm, subsequent encounter for
fracture with routine healing
M80.031G
Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, right forearm, subsequent encounter for
fracture with delayed healing
M80.031K Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, right forearm, subsequent encounter for
fracture with nonunion
M80.031P
Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, right forearm, subsequent encounter for
fracture with malunion
Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, right forearm, sequela
Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, left forearm, initial encounter for fracture
M80.032D
Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, left forearm, subsequent encounter for
fracture with routine healing
M80.032G Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, left forearm, subsequent encounter for
fracture with delayed healing
M80.032K
Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, left forearm, subsequent encounter for
fracture with nonunion
M80.032P Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, left forearm, subsequent encounter for
fracture with malunion
Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, left forearm, sequela
M80.039A Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, unspecified forearm, initial encounter for
fracture
M80.039D
Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, unspecified forearm, subsequent encounter
for fracture with routine healing
M80.039G Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, unspecified forearm, subsequent encounter
for fracture with delayed healing
M80.039K
Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, unspecified forearm, subsequent encounter
for fracture with nonunion
M80.039P Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, unspecified forearm, subsequent encounter
for fracture with malunion
Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, unspecified forearm, sequela
Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, right hand, initial encounter for fracture
M80.041D Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, right hand, subsequent encounter for
fracture with routine healing
M80.041G
Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, right hand, subsequent encounter for
fracture with delayed healing
M80.041K Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, right hand, subsequent encounter for
fracture with nonunion
M80.041P
Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, right hand, subsequent encounter for
fracture with malunion
Denosumab (Prolia
®
& Xgeva
®
)
Page 8 of 22
UnitedHealthcare Commercial Medical Benefit Drug Policy
Effective 04/01/2024
Proprietary Information of UnitedHealthcare. Copyright 2024 United HealthCare Services, Inc.
Description
Prolia
Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, right hand, sequela
Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, left hand, initial encounter for fracture
M80.042D Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, left hand, subsequent encounter for fracture
with routine healing
M80.042G
Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, left hand, subsequent encounter for fracture
with delayed healing
M80.042K Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, left hand, subsequent encounter for fracture
with nonunion
M80.042P
Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, left hand, subsequent encounter for fracture
with malunion
Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, left hand, sequela
M80.049A Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, unspecified hand, initial encounter for
fracture
M80.049D Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, unspecified hand, subsequent encounter for
fracture with routine healing
M80.049G Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, unspecified hand, subsequent encounter for
fracture with delayed healing
M80.049K Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, unspecified hand, subsequent encounter for
fracture with nonunion
M80.049P Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, unspecified hand, subsequent encounter for
fracture with malunion
Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, unspecified hand, sequela
Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, right femur, initial encounter for fracture
M80.051D
Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, right femur, subsequent encounter for
fracture with routine healing
M80.051G Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, right femur, subsequent encounter for
fracture with delayed healing
M80.051K
Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, right femur, subsequent encounter for
fracture with nonunion
M80.051P Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, right femur, subsequent encounter for
fracture with malunion
Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, right femur, sequela
Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, left femur, initial encounter for fracture
M80.052D Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, left femur, subsequent encounter for
fracture with routine healing
M80.052G
Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, left femur, subsequent encounter for
fracture with delayed healing
M80.052K Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, left femur, subsequent encounter for
fracture with nonunion
M80.052P
Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, left femur, subsequent encounter for
fracture with malunion
Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, left femur, sequela
M80.059A
Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, unspecified femur, initial encounter for
fracture
Denosumab (Prolia
®
& Xgeva
®
)
Page 9 of 22
UnitedHealthcare Commercial Medical Benefit Drug Policy
Effective 04/01/2024
Proprietary Information of UnitedHealthcare. Copyright 2024 United HealthCare Services, Inc.
Description
Prolia
M80.059D Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, unspecified femur, subsequent encounter
for fracture with routine healing
M80.059G Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, unspecified femur, subsequent encounter
for fracture with delayed healing
M80.059K Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, unspecified femur, subsequent encounter
for fracture with nonunion
M80.059P Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, unspecified femur, subsequent encounter
for fracture with malunion
Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, unspecified femur, sequela
Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, right lower leg, initial encounter for fracture
M80.061D Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, right lower leg, subsequent encounter for
fracture with routine healing
M80.061G
Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, right lower leg, subsequent encounter for
fracture with delayed healing
M80.061K Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, right lower leg, subsequent encounter for
fracture with nonunion
M80.061P
Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, right lower leg, subsequent encounter for
fracture with malunion
Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, right lower leg, sequela
Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, left lower leg, initial encounter for fracture
M80.062D
Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, left lower leg, subsequent encounter for
fracture with routine healing
M80.062G Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, left lower leg, subsequent encounter for
fracture with delayed healing
M80.062K
Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, left lower leg, subsequent encounter for
fracture with nonunion
M80.062P Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, left lower leg, subsequent encounter for
fracture with malunion
Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, left lower leg, sequela
M80.069A Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, unspecified lower leg, initial encounter for
fracture
M80.069D
Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, unspecified lower leg, subsequent
encounter for fracture with routine healing
M80.069G Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, unspecified lower leg, subsequent
encounter for fracture with delayed healing
M80.069K
Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, unspecified lower leg, subsequent
encounter for fracture with nonunion
M80.069P Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, unspecified lower leg, subsequent
encounter for fracture with malunion
Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, unspecified lower leg, sequela
M80.071A Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, right ankle and foot, initial encounter for
fracture
M80.071D Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, right ankle and foot, subsequent encounter
for fracture with routine healing
Denosumab (Prolia
®
& Xgeva
®
)
Page 10 of 22
UnitedHealthcare Commercial Medical Benefit Drug Policy
Effective 04/01/2024
Proprietary Information of UnitedHealthcare. Copyright 2024 United HealthCare Services, Inc.
Description
Prolia
M80.071G Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, right ankle and foot, subsequent encounter
for fracture with delayed healing
M80.071K Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, right ankle and foot, subsequent encounter
for fracture with nonunion
M80.071P Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, right ankle and foot, subsequent encounter
for fracture with malunion
Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, right ankle and foot, sequela
M80.072A Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, left ankle and foot, initial encounter for
fracture
M80.072D
Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, left ankle and foot, subsequent encounter
for fracture with routine healing
M80.072G Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, left ankle and foot, subsequent encounter
for fracture with delayed healing
M80.072K
Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, left ankle and foot, subsequent encounter
for fracture with nonunion
M80.072P Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, left ankle and foot, subsequent encounter
for fracture with malunion
Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, left ankle and foot, sequela
M80.079A Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, unspecified ankle and foot, initial encounter
for fracture
M80.079D
Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, unspecified ankle and foot, subsequent
encounter for fracture with routine healing
M80.079G Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, unspecified ankle and foot, subsequent
encounter for fracture with delayed healing
M80.079K
Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, unspecified ankle and foot, subsequent
encounter for fracture with nonunion
M80.079P Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, unspecified ankle and foot, subsequent
encounter for fracture with malunion
Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, unspecified ankle and foot, sequela
Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, vertebra(e), initial encounter for fracture
M80.08XD Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, vertebra(e), subsequent encounter for
fracture with routine healing
M80.08XG
Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, vertebra(e), subsequent encounter for
fracture with delayed healing
M80.08XK Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, vertebra(e), subsequent encounter for
fracture with nonunion
M80.08XP
Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, vertebra(e), subsequent encounter for
fracture with malunion
Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, vertebra(e), sequela
Other osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, right shoulder, initial encounter for fracture
M80.811D Other osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, right shoulder, subsequent encounter for fracture
with routine healing
M80.811G Other osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, right shoulder, subsequent encounter for fracture
with delayed healing
Denosumab (Prolia
®
& Xgeva
®
)
Page 11 of 22
UnitedHealthcare Commercial Medical Benefit Drug Policy
Effective 04/01/2024
Proprietary Information of UnitedHealthcare. Copyright 2024 United HealthCare Services, Inc.
Description
Prolia
M80.811K Other osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, right shoulder, subsequent encounter for fracture
with nonunion
M80.811P Other osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, right shoulder, subsequent encounter for fracture
with malunion
Other osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, right shoulder, sequela
Other osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, other site, initial encounter for fracture
M80.8AXD Other osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, other site, subsequent encounter for fracture with
routine healing
M80.8AXG
Other osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, other site, subsequent encounter for fracture with
delayed healing
M80.8AXK Other osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, other site, subsequent encounter for fracture with
nonunion
M80.8AXP
Other osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, other site, subsequent encounter for fracture with
malunion
Other osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, other site, sequela
Other osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, left shoulder, initial encounter for fracture
M80.812D
Other osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, left shoulder, subsequent encounter for fracture
with routine healing
M80.812G Other osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, left shoulder, subsequent encounter for fracture
with delayed healing
M80.812K
Other osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, left shoulder, subsequent encounter for fracture
with nonunion
M80.812P Other osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, left shoulder, subsequent encounter for fracture
with malunion
Other osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, left shoulder, sequela
Other osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, unspecified shoulder, initial encounter for fracture
M80.819D Other osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, unspecified shoulder, subsequent encounter for
fracture with routine healing
M80.819G Other osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, unspecified shoulder, subsequent encounter for
fracture with delayed healing
M80.819K Other osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, unspecified shoulder, subsequent encounter for
fracture with nonunion
M80.819P Other osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, unspecified shoulder, subsequent encounter for
fracture with malunion
Other osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, unspecified shoulder, sequela
Other osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, right humerus, initial encounter for fracture
M80.821D Other osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, right humerus, subsequent encounter for fracture
with routine healing
M80.821G
Other osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, right humerus, subsequent encounter for fracture
with delayed healing
M80.821K Other osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, right humerus, subsequent encounter for fracture
with nonunion
M80.821P
Other osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, right humerus, subsequent encounter for fracture
with malunion
Other osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, right humerus, sequela
Denosumab (Prolia
®
& Xgeva
®
)
Page 12 of 22
UnitedHealthcare Commercial Medical Benefit Drug Policy
Effective 04/01/2024
Proprietary Information of UnitedHealthcare. Copyright 2024 United HealthCare Services, Inc.
Description
Prolia
Other osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, left humerus, initial encounter for fracture
M80.822D
Other osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, left humerus, subsequent encounter for fracture
with routine healing
M80.822G Other osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, left humerus, subsequent encounter for fracture
with delayed healing
M80.822K
Other osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, left humerus, subsequent encounter for fracture
with nonunion
M80.822P Other osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, left humerus, subsequent encounter for fracture
with malunion
Other osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, left humerus, sequela
Other osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, unspecified humerus, initial encounter for fracture
M80.829D Other osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, unspecified humerus, subsequent encounter for
fracture with routine healing
M80.829G Other osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, unspecified humerus, subsequent encounter for
fracture with delayed healing
M80.829K Other osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, unspecified humerus, subsequent encounter for
fracture with nonunion
M80.829P Other osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, unspecified humerus, subsequent encounter for
fracture with malunion
Other osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, unspecified humerus, sequela
Other osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, right forearm, initial encounter for fracture
M80.831D Other osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, right forearm, subsequent encounter for fracture
with routine healing
M80.831G
Other osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, right forearm, subsequent encounter for fracture
with delayed healing
M80.831K Other osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, right forearm, subsequent encounter for fracture
with nonunion
M80.831P
Other osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, right forearm, subsequent encounter for fracture
with malunion
Other osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, right forearm, sequela
Other osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, left forearm, initial encounter for fracture
M80.832D
Other osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, left forearm, subsequent encounter for fracture
with routine healing
M80.832G Other osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, left forearm, subsequent encounter for fracture
with routine healing
M80.832K
Other osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, left forearm, subsequent encounter for fracture
with nonunion
M80.832P Other osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, left forearm, subsequent encounter for fracture
with malunion
Other osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, left forearm, sequela
Other osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, unspecified forearm, initial encounter for fracture
M80.839D Other osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, unspecified forearm, subsequent encounter for
fracture with routine healing
M80.839G Other osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, unspecified forearm, subsequent encounter for
fracture with delayed healing
Denosumab (Prolia
®
& Xgeva
®
)
Page 13 of 22
UnitedHealthcare Commercial Medical Benefit Drug Policy
Effective 04/01/2024
Proprietary Information of UnitedHealthcare. Copyright 2024 United HealthCare Services, Inc.
Description
Prolia
M80.839K Other osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, unspecified forearm, subsequent encounter for
fracture with nonunion
M80.839P Other osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, unspecified forearm, subsequent encounter for
fracture with malunion
Other osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, unspecified forearm, sequela
Other osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, right hand, initial encounter for fracture
M80.841D Other osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, right hand, subsequent encounter for fracture with
routine healing
M80.841G
Other osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, right hand, subsequent encounter for fracture with
delayed healing
M80.841K Other osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, right hand, subsequent encounter for fracture with
nonunion
M80.841P
Other osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, right hand, subsequent encounter for fracture with
malunion
Other osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, right hand, sequela
Other osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, left hand, initial encounter for fracture
M80.842D
Other osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, left hand, subsequent encounter for fracture with
routine healing
M80.842G Other osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, left hand, subsequent encounter for fracture with
delayed healing
M80.842K
Other osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, left hand, subsequent encounter for fracture with
nonunion
M80.842P Other osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, left hand, subsequent encounter for fracture with
malunion
Other osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, left hand, sequela
Other osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, unspecified hand, initial encounter for fracture
M80.849D Other osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, unspecified hand, subsequent encounter for
fracture with routine healing
M80.849G Other osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, unspecified hand, subsequent encounter for
fracture with delayed healing
M80.849K Other osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, unspecified hand, subsequent encounter for
fracture with nonunion
M80.849P Other osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, unspecified hand, subsequent encounter for
fracture with malunion
Other osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, unspecified hand, sequela
Other osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, right femur, initial encounter for fracture
M80.851D Other osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, right femur, subsequent encounter for fracture
with routine healing
M80.851G
Other osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, right femur, subsequent encounter for fracture
with delayed healing
M80.851K Other osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, right femur, subsequent encounter for fracture
with nonunion
M80.851P
Other osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, right femur, subsequent encounter for fracture
with malunion
Other osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, right femur, sequela
Denosumab (Prolia
®
& Xgeva
®
)
Page 14 of 22
UnitedHealthcare Commercial Medical Benefit Drug Policy
Effective 04/01/2024
Proprietary Information of UnitedHealthcare. Copyright 2024 United HealthCare Services, Inc.
Description
Prolia
Other osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, left femur, initial encounter for fracture
M80.852D
Other osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, left femur, subsequent encounter for fracture with
routine healing
M80.852G Other osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, left femur, subsequent encounter for fracture with
delayed healing
M80.852K
Other osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, left femur, subsequent encounter for fracture with
nonunion
M80.852P Other osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, left femur, subsequent encounter for fracture with
malunion
Other osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, left femur, sequela
Other osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, unspecified femur, initial encounter for fracture
M80.859D Other osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, unspecified femur, subsequent encounter for
fracture with routine healing
M80.859G Other osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, unspecified femur, subsequent encounter for
fracture with delayed healing
M80.859K Other osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, unspecified femur, subsequent encounter for
fracture with nonunion
M80.859P Other osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, unspecified femur, subsequent encounter for
fracture with malunion
Other osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, unspecified femur, sequela
Other osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, right lower leg, initial encounter for fracture
M80.861D Other osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, right lower leg, subsequent encounter for fracture
with routine healing
M80.861G
Other osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, right lower leg, subsequent encounter for fracture
with delayed healing
M80.861K Other osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, right lower leg, subsequent encounter for fracture
with nonunion
M80.861P
Other osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, right lower leg, subsequent encounter for fracture
with malunion
Other osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, right lower leg, sequela
Other osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, left lower leg, initial encounter for fracture
M80.862D
Other osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, left lower leg, subsequent encounter for fracture
with routine healing
M80.862G Other osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, left lower leg, subsequent encounter for fracture
with delayed healing
M80.862K
Other osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, left lower leg, subsequent encounter for fracture
with nonunion
M80.862P Other osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, left lower leg, subsequent encounter for fracture
with malunion
Other osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, left lower leg, sequela
Other osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, unspecified lower leg, initial encounter for fracture
M80.869D Other osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, unspecified lower leg, subsequent encounter for
fracture with routine healing
M80.869G Other osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, unspecified lower leg, subsequent encounter for
fracture with delayed healing
Denosumab (Prolia
®
& Xgeva
®
)
Page 15 of 22
UnitedHealthcare Commercial Medical Benefit Drug Policy
Effective 04/01/2024
Proprietary Information of UnitedHealthcare. Copyright 2024 United HealthCare Services, Inc.
Description
Prolia
M80.869K Other osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, unspecified lower leg, subsequent encounter for
fracture with nonunion
M80.869P Other osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, unspecified lower leg, subsequent encounter for
fracture with malunion
Other osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, unspecified lower leg, sequela
Other osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, right ankle and foot, initial encounter for fracture
M80.871D Other osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, right ankle and foot, subsequent encounter for
fracture with routine healing
M80.871G
Other osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, right ankle and foot, subsequent encounter for
fracture with delayed healing
M80.871K Other osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, right ankle and foot, subsequent encounter for
fracture with nonunion
M80.871P
Other osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, right ankle and foot, subsequent encounter for
fracture with malunion
Other osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, right ankle and foot, sequela
Other osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, left ankle and foot, initial encounter for fracture
M80.872D
Other osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, left ankle and foot, subsequent encounter for
fracture with routine healing
M80.872G Other osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, left ankle and foot, subsequent encounter for
fracture with delayed healing
M80.872K
Other osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, left ankle and foot, subsequent encounter for
fracture with nonunion
M80.872P Other osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, left ankle and foot, subsequent encounter for
fracture with malunion
Other osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, left ankle and foot, sequela
M80.879A Other osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, unspecified ankle and foot, initial encounter for
fracture
M80.879D
Other osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, unspecified ankle and foot, subsequent encounter
for fracture with routine healing
M80.879G Other osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, unspecified ankle and foot, subsequent encounter
for fracture with delayed healing
M80.879K
Other osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, unspecified ankle and foot, subsequent encounter
for fracture with nonunion
M80.879P Other osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, unspecified ankle and foot, subsequent encounter
for fracture with malunion
Other osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, unspecified ankle and foot, sequela
Other osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, vertebra(e), initial encounter for fracture
M80.88XD Other osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, vertebra(e), subsequent encounter for fracture
with routine healing
M80.88XG
Other osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, vertebra(e), subsequent encounter for fracture
with delayed healing
M80.88XK Other osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, vertebra(e), subsequent encounter for fracture
with nonunion
M80.88XP
Other osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, vertebra(e), subsequent encounter for fracture
with malunion
Denosumab (Prolia
®
& Xgeva
®
)
Page 16 of 22
UnitedHealthcare Commercial Medical Benefit Drug Policy
Effective 04/01/2024
Proprietary Information of UnitedHealthcare. Copyright 2024 United HealthCare Services, Inc.
Description
Prolia
Other osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, vertebra(e), sequela
Age-related osteoporosis without current pathological fracture
Other osteoporosis without current pathological fracture
Personal history of (healed) osteoporosis fracture
Long-term (current) use of systemic steroids
Long-term (current) use of aromatase inhibitors
Long-term (current use of other agents affecting estrogen receptors and estrogen levels
Xgeva
Malignant neoplasm of prostate
Secondary malignant neoplasm of unspecified kidney and renal pelvis
Secondary malignant neoplasm of right kidney and renal pelvis
Secondary malignant neoplasm of left kidney and renal pelvis
Secondary malignant neoplasm of unspecified urinary organs
Secondary malignant neoplasm of bladder
Secondary malignant neoplasm of other urinary organs
Secondary malignant neoplasm of skin
Secondary malignant neoplasm of brain
Secondary malignant neoplasm of cerebral meninges
Secondary malignant neoplasm of unspecified part of nervous system
Secondary malignant neoplasm of other parts of nervous system
Secondary malignant neoplasm of bone
Secondary malignant neoplasm of bone marrow
Secondary malignant neoplasm of unspecified ovary
Secondary malignant neoplasm of right ovary
Secondary malignant neoplasm of left ovary
Secondary malignant neoplasm of bilateral ovaries
Secondary malignant neoplasm of unspecified adrenal gland
Secondary malignant neoplasm of right adrenal gland
Secondary malignant neoplasm of left adrenal gland
Secondary malignant neoplasm of breast
Secondary malignant neoplasm of genital organs
Secondary malignant neoplasm of other specified sites
Secondary malignant neoplasm of unspecified site
Multiple myeloma not having achieved remission
Multiple myeloma in relapse
Systemic mastocytosis
Neoplasm of uncertain behavior of bone and articular cartilage
Hypercalcemia
Denosumab (Prolia
®
& Xgeva
®
)
Page 17 of 22
UnitedHealthcare Commercial Medical Benefit Drug Policy
Effective 04/01/2024
Proprietary Information of UnitedHealthcare. Copyright 2024 United HealthCare Services, Inc.
Background
Osteoporosis is characterized by low bone mass, microarchitectural disruption, and increased skeletal fragility. The Word
Health Organization (WHO) established diagnostic thresholds for bone mineral density (BMD) by dual-energy x-ray
absorptiometry (DXA) according to the standard deviation (SD) difference between a patient’s BMD and that of a young adult
reference population (T-score). A T-score of -2.5 SD or below is defined as osteoporosis, provided that other causes of low BMD
have been ruled out, and a T-score between -1 and -2.5 SD is defined as osteopenia. Additionally, guidelines state that
osteoporosis can be diagnosed by one of the following
1
: (1) Presence of fragility fractures in the absence of other metabolic
bone disorders; (2) T-score 2.5 SD in the lumbar spine (antero-posterior), femoral neck, total hip, or one-third radius; or (3) T-
score between −1.0 and −2.5 and increased fracture risk using the FRAX
®
(fracture risk assessment tool) country-specific
thresholds. The FRAX tool is designed to assist clinicians in predicting the ten-year probability of hip fracture and 10-year
probability of a major osteoporotic fracture (spine, forearm, hip or shoulder fracture) with or without the addition of femoral
neck BMD.
7
In the United States, a clinical diagnosis of osteoporosis may be made when the FRAX 10-year probability of major
osteoporotic fracture (hip, clinical spine, proximal humerus, or forearm) is greater than or equal to 20 percent or the FRAX 10-
year probability of hip fracture is greater than or equal to 3 percent.
Denosumab binds to RANKL, a transmembrane or soluble protein essential for the formation, function, and survival of
osteoclasts, the cells responsible for bone resorption, thereby modulating calcium release from bone. Denosumab prevents
RANKL from activating its receptor, RANK, on the surface of osteoclasts, their precursors, and osteoclast-like giant cells.
Prevention of the RANKL/RANK interaction inhibits osteoclast formation, function, and survival, thereby decreasing bone
resorption and increasing bone mass and strength in both cortical and trabecular bone. Increased osteoclast activity,
stimulated by RANKL, is a mediator of bone pathology in solid tumors with osseous metastases. Similarly, giant cell tumors of
bone consist of stromal cells expressing RANKL and osteoclast-like giant cells expressing RANK receptor, and signaling
through the RANK receptor contributes to osteolysis and tumor growth.
13,14
Benefit Considerations
Some Certificates of Coverage allow for coverage of experimental/investigational/unproven treatments for life-threatening
illnesses when certain conditions are met. The member specific benefit plan document must be consulted to make coverage
decisions for this service. Some states mandate benefit coverage for off-label use of medications for some diagnoses or under
some circumstances when certain conditions are met. Where such mandates apply, they supersede language in the benefit
document or in the medical or drug policy. Benefit coverage for an otherwise unproven service for the treatment of serious rare
diseases may occur when certain conditions are met. Refer to the Policy and Procedure addressing the treatment of serious
rare diseases.
Clinical Evidence
Prolia
Postmenopausal Patients with Osteoporosis
In a post-hoc analysis of the 7-year FREEDOM Extension trial, Kendler et al, analyzed whether women who experienced fracture
while on denosumab was due to inadequate treatment response, or whether the risk of fracture remains low while continuing
denosumab treatment. During the extension trial, all study participants were to receive denosumab. The authors of this analysis
compared subsequent osteoporotic fracture rates between denosumab treated subjects during the initial FREEDOM or the
extension and placebo-treated subjects in FREEDOM. During FREEDOM, 438 placebo- and 272 denosumab-treated subjects
had an osteoporotic fracture. Exposure-adjusted subject incidence per 100 subject-years was lower for denosumab (6.7) vs
placebo (10.1). Combining all subjects on denosumab from FREEDOM and the Extension for up to 10 years (combined
denosumab), 794 (13.7%) had an osteoporotic fracture while on denosumab. One or more subsequent fractures occurred in
144 (18.1%) subjects, with an exposure-adjusted incidence of 5.8 per 100 subject-years, similar to FREEDOM denosumab (6.7
per 100 subject-years) and lower than FREEDOM placebo (10.1 per 100 subject years). Adjusting for prior fracture, the risk of
having a subsequent on-study osteoporotic fracture was lower in the combined denosumab group vs placebo (hazard ratio
[95% CI]: 0.59 [0.430.81]; p = 0.0012). The authors concluded that the post-hoc analysis demonstrates that denosumab
decreases the risk of subsequent fracture and a fracture sustained while on denosumab, and not necessarily due to inadequate
treatment response.
21
Denosumab (Prolia
®
& Xgeva
®
)
Page 18 of 22
UnitedHealthcare Commercial Medical Benefit Drug Policy
Effective 04/01/2024
Proprietary Information of UnitedHealthcare. Copyright 2024 United HealthCare Services, Inc.
Brown JP et al compared the efficacy and safety of denosumab with alendronate in postmenopausal women with low bone
mass in a phase 3, multicenter, double-blind study.
11
Participants included postmenopausal women with a T-score < or = -2.0 at
the lumbar spine or total hip and received subcutaneous denosumab injections (60 mg every 6 months [Q6M]) plus oral
placebo weekly (n = 594) or oral alendronate weekly (70 mg) plus subcutaneous placebo injections Q6M (n = 595). Efficacy was
measured by assessing changes in BMD at the total hip, femoral neck, trochanter, lumbar spine, and one-third radius at 6 and
12 months. Additionally, bone turnover markers at months 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 were assessed. Adverse events were monitored to
evaluate safety. Denosumab significantly increased BMD at month 12 (3.5% versus 2.6%; p < 0.0001 for the total hip).
Significantly greater increases in BMD were observed with denosumab at all measured skeletal sites over the twelve month
treatment period. Denosumab showed significantly greater reduction of bone turnover markers compared to alendronate.
Adverse events and laboratory values were similar for the two treatment groups. The authors conclude that denosumab showed
a significantly larger gain in BMD and greater reduction in bone turnover markers compared with alendronate. Overall, the
safety profile was similar for both treatment groups.
Men with Low Bone Mineral Density
Langdahl BL et al evaluated denosumab therapy in men with low bone mineral density (BMD) in a multicenter, phase 3 study.
9
The study consisted of 2 treatment periods including a 12-month double-blind, placebo-controlled phase and a 12-month open-
label phase. Participants from the original denosumab (long-term) and placebo (crossover) groups received 60 mg of
denosumab subcutaneous every 6 months. During the open-label phase, the following BMD increases occurred with long-term
denosumab treatment (2.2% lumbar spine, 0.9% total hip, 1.3% femoral neck, 1.3% trochanter, and 0.2% 1/3 radius), resulting
in cumulative 24-month gains from baseline of 8.0%, 3.4%, 3.4%, 4.6%, and 0.7%, respectively (all p < .01). The crossover group
showed BMD gains similar to the long-term treatment group during the first 12 months of treatment. Similar adverse event rates
were seen in both groups. The authors conclude that in the study population, denosumab treatment for a second year
continued to increase BMD, maintained reductions in bone resorption, and was well tolerated. These results were similar to
previous results in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis and in men with prostate cancer receiving androgen deprivation
therapy.
Orwoll E. et al evaluated the safety and efficacy of denosumab compared with placebo in men with low BMD after 1 year of
treatment in a placebo-controlled, phase 3 study.
10
The primary endpoint was the percent change of BMS from baseline in
lumbar spine (LS) at one year. After 12 months, denosumab resulted in BMD increases of 5.7% at the LS, 2.4% at the total hip,
2.1% at the femoral neck, 3.1% at the trochanter, and 0.6% at the one third radius (adjusted p ≤ 0.0144 for BMD percent
differences at all sites compared with placebo). The incidence of adverse events was similar between groups. The authors
conclude that 12 months of treatment with denosumab in men with low BMD was well tolerated and resulted in a reduction in
bone resorption and significant increases in BMD at all skeletal sites assessed.
Patients at High Risk for Fracture Receiving Androgen Deprivation Therapy for Non-Metastatic Prostate
Cancer
Smith ME et al investigated the effects of denosumab in a double-blind, multicenter study, on bone mineral density and
fractures in patients with non-metastatic prostate cancer who are receiving androgen-deprivation therapy.
8
Patients were
randomly assigned to receive denosumab at a dose of 60 mg subcutaneously every 6 months or placebo (n = 734 per group).
The primary end point was percent change in bone mineral density at the lumbar spine at 24 months. Secondary end points
included percent change in bone mineral densities at the femoral neck and total hip at 24 months and at all three sites at 36
months, as well as frequency of new vertebral fractures. At 24 months, patients receiving denosumab experienced an increase
in bone mineral density of the lumbar spine by 5.6% as compared with a loss of 1.0% in the placebo group (p < 0.001).
Significant differences between the placebo and denosumab groups were seen at 1 month and continued through 36 months.
Treatment was also associated with significant increases in bone mineral density at the total hip, femoral neck, and distal third
of the radius. Patients who received denosumab had a decreased incidence of new vertebral fractures at 36 months (1.5%, vs.
3.9% with placebo) (relative risk, 0.38; 95% confidence interval, 0.19 to 0.78; p = 0.006). Similar rates of adverse events were
reported in the two groups. The authors conclude that denosumab is associated with increased bone mineral density at all sites
and a reduction in the incidence of new vertebral fractures among patients receiving androgen-deprivation therapy for non-
metastatic prostate cancer. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00089674)
Glucocorticoid-Induced Osteoporosis in Patients at High Risk for Fracture
Saag et al assessed the efficacy and safety of denosumab compared with risedronate in glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis in
a 24-month, double-blind, active-controlled, double-dummy, non-inferiority study.
18
The study enrolled patients aged 18 years or
Denosumab (Prolia
®
& Xgeva
®
)
Page 19 of 22
UnitedHealthcare Commercial Medical Benefit Drug Policy
Effective 04/01/2024
Proprietary Information of UnitedHealthcare. Copyright 2024 United HealthCare Services, Inc.
older who were receiving ≥ 7.5 mg prednisone daily or equivalent, for at least 3 months (glucocorticoid continuing) or less than
3 months (glucocorticoid initiating). Patients under 50 years of age were required to have a history of osteoporosis-related
fracture. Patients 50 years and older needed a lumbar spine, total hip, or femoral neck bone mineral density T score of -2.0 or
less, or -1.0 or less if they had a history of osteoporosis-related fracture. Study patients received either 60 mg subcutaneous
denosumab every 6 months and oral placebo daily for, or 5 mg oral risedronate daily and subcutaneous placebo every 6
months for 24 months. The primary outcome was non-inferiority of denosumab to risedronate in terms of percentage change
from baseline in lumbar spine bone mineral density at 12 months based on non-inferiority margins. In addition, superiority was
also assessed. The safety analysis included all study patients who received one dose or more of their assigned investigational
product. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01575873). Denosumab was both non-inferior and superior to
risedronate at 12 months for effect on bone mineral density at the lumbar spine in both glucocorticoid-continuing (4.4% [95% CI
3.8-5.0] vs. 2.3% [1.7-2.9]; p < 0.0001) and glucocorticoid-initiating (3.8% [3.1-4.5]vs 0.8% [0.2-1.5]; p < 0.0001) subpopulations.
Incidence of adverse events and fractures was similar between treatment groups. The most common adverse events in both
groups included back pain and arthralgia. Serious infection occurred in 15 (4%) patients in the risedronate group and 17 (4%)
patients in the denosumab group. The authors conclude that denosumab could be a useful treatment option for patients taking
glucocorticoids who are at risk for fractures.
Xgeva
In an ad hoc analysis of the phase 3 clinical trial of 1,776 patients with metastases from solid tumors or multiple myeloma,
where it was shown that denosumab was non-inferior to zoledronic acid (ZA) in delaying or preventing SREs, Henry et al reports
outcomes in the subgroup of 1,597 patients with solid tumors, excluding multiple myeloma.
17
In the ad hoc analysis,
denosumab significantly delayed time to first on-study SRE compared to ZA (HR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.680.96) and time to first-and-
subsequent SREs (RR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.721.00). Denosumab also significantly delayed time to development of moderate or
severe pain (HR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.661.00), pain worsening (HR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.710.97), and worsening pain interference in
patients with no/mild baseline pain (HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.610.96). Overall survival was similar in both groups. The median KM
estimate was 10.7 months for denosumab-treated patients and 10.0 months for ZA-treated patients (HR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.81
1.05: p = 0.215). Similarly, there was no difference between groups in time to disease progression. The median KM estimate
was 5.3 (4.9, 5.7) months for denosumab-treated and 5.4 (4.8, 5.7) months for ZA-treated patients (HR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.851.08:
p = 0.497). The authors concluded that denosumab was more effective in delaying the incidence of SREs, however did not
significantly affect the overall incidence or disease progression or overall survival.
In a double-blind, double-dummy, phase III clinical trial, Henry et al compared denosumab with zoledronic acid (ZA) for delaying
or preventing skeletal-related events (SRE) in patients with advanced cancer and bone metastases (excluding breast and
prostate) or myeloma.
16
Patients were randomly assigned to receive either monthly subcutaneous denosumab 120mg (n = 886)
or intravenous ZA 4mg (dose adjustment for renal impairment; n = 890). The primary end point was time to first on-study SRE
(pathologic fracture, radiation or surgery to bone, or spinal cord compression). The trial demonstrated that denosumab was
noninferior to ZA in delaying time to first on-study SRE (hazard ratio, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.71 to 0.98; p = 0.0007). Denosumab was
not statistically superior to ZA in delaying time to first on-study SRE (p = 0.03 unadjusted; p = 0.06 adjusted for multiplicity) or
time to first-and-subsequent (multiple) SRE (rate ratio, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.77 to 1.04; p = 0.14). Overall survival and disease
progression were similar between groups. Hypocalcemia occurred more frequently with denosumab. Osteonecrosis of the jaw
occurred at similarly low rates in both groups. Acute-phase reactions after the first dose occurred more frequently with ZA, as
did renal adverse events and elevations in serum creatinine. The authors concluded that denosumab was noninferior to ZA in
preventing or delaying first on-study SRE in patients with advanced cancer metastatic to bone or myeloma.
Fizazi et al evaluated the comparison of denosumab with zoledronic acid (ZA) for the prevention of skeletal-related events in
men with bone metastases from castration-resistant prostate cancer.
20
In a phase 3 clinical study, 1904 men with castration-
resistant prostate cancer had no previous exposure to IV bisphosphonate were randomized 1:1 to either receive 120mg
subcutaneous denosumab plus IV placebo (n = 950), or 4mg IV ZA plus subcutaneous placebo (n = 951) every 4 weeks. The
primary endpoint was time to first on-study skeletal related event (pathological fracture, radiation therapy, surgery to bone, or
spinal cord compression), and was assessed for non-inferiority. The same outcome was further assessed for superiority as a
secondary endpoint. Efficacy analysis was by intention to treat. Median time to first on-study skeletal-related event was 20.7
months (95% CI 18.824.9) with denosumab compared with 17.1 months (15.019.4) with zoledronic acid (hazard ratio 0.82,
95% CI 0.710.95; p = 0.0002 for non-inferiority; p = 0.008 for superiority). While there was a three-month increase in the time to
first skeletal-related events observed with denosumab in men with prostate cancer, there was no clinically meaningful difference
in skeletal-related events for denosumab as compared with zoledronic acid: Overall confirmed events (ZA vs. denosumab) 41%
vs. 36%; radiation to bone (21% vs. 19%); pathological fracture (15% vs. 14%); spinal cord compression (4% vs. 3%); surgery to
Denosumab (Prolia
®
& Xgeva
®
)
Page 20 of 22
UnitedHealthcare Commercial Medical Benefit Drug Policy
Effective 04/01/2024
Proprietary Information of UnitedHealthcare. Copyright 2024 United HealthCare Services, Inc.
bone (< 1% vs. < 1%). The authors concluded that denosumab was better than ZA for delaying the time to first SRE, however,
was not significantly better at preventing the overall incidence of SREs versus zoledronic acid.
Professional Societies
National Comprehensive Cancer Network Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines
®
)
Several National Comprehensive Cancer Network Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines
®
) include
denosumab as a treatment for several conditions related to malignant disease. The following NCCN Guidelines
®
state:
15
For non-small cell lung cancer, the NCCN recommends (Category 2A) denosumab to be considered in patients with bone
metastases.
For ductal carcinoma, invasive breast cancer or inflammatory breast cancer, the NCCN recommends (Category 2A)
denosumab to be considered in postmenopausal (natural or induced) patients receiving adjuvant aromatase inhibition
therapy along with calcium and vitamin D supplementation to maintain or improve bone mineral density and reduce risk of
fractures.
For invasive or inflammatory breast cancer, the NCCN recommends (Category 1) denosumab to be used with calcium and
vitamin D supplementation in addition to chemotherapy or endocrine therapy for bone metastasis in patients with expected
survival ≥ 3 months with adequate renal function.
For kidney cancer, the NCCN recommends (Category 2A) denosumab to be used as a component of best supportive care
for bony metastases.
For systemic mastocytosis, the NCCN recommends (Category 2A) denosumab as second-line therapy for
osteopenia/osteoporosis in patients with bone pain not responding to bisphosphonates or for patients who are not
candidates for bisphosphonates because of renal insufficiency.
For thyroid carcinoma (anaplastic, follicular, medullary, oncocytic, papillary), the NCCN recommends (Category 2A)
denosumab to be considered for bone metastases or palliative care for bone metastases (anaplastic).
For giant cell tumor of the bone, the NCCN recommends (Category 2A) denosumab as a single agent or combined with
serial embolization (preferred), and/or radiation therapy for resectable disease with unacceptable morbidity and/or
unresectable axial lesions for patients with localized disease, metastases at presentation, or recurrence, denosumab is also
recommended as a single agent for unresectable metastatic disease, unresectable metastatic recurrence or considered
prior to surgery for resectable local recurrence.
For prostate cancer, the NCCN recommends (Category 2A) denosumab for prevention or treatment of osteoporosis during
androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for patients with high fracture risk, denosumab is also recommended (Category 1) as
the preferred agent for the prevention of skeletal-related events in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer who
have documented bone metastases and creatinine clearance greater than 30 ml/min.
For multiple myeloma, the NCCN recommends (Category 2A) denosumab to be used in combination with primary myeloma
therapy and is the preferred agent in patients with renal insufficiency.
U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
This section is to be used for informational purposes only. FDA approval alone is not a basis for coverage.
Prolia (denosumab) is a RANK ligand inhibitor indicated for the following uses
13
:
Treatment of postmenopausal women with osteoporosis at high risk for fracture, defined as a history of osteoporotic
fracture, or multiple risk factors for fracture; or patients who have failed or are intolerant to other available osteoporosis
therapy. In postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, Prolia reduces the incidence of vertebral, nonvertebral, and hip
fractures.
Treatment to increase bone mass in men with osteoporosis at high risk for fracture, defined as a history of osteoporotic
fracture, or multiple risk factors for fracture; or patients who have failed or are intolerant to other available osteoporosis
therapy.
Treatment of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis in men and women at high risk of fracture who are either initiating or
continuing systemic glucocorticoids in a daily dosage equivalent to 7.5 mg or greater of prednisone and expected to
remain on glucocorticoids for at least 6 months, high risk of fracture is defined as a history of osteoporotic fracture, multiple
risk factors for fracture, or patients who have failed or are intolerant to other available osteoporosis therapy.
Treatment to increase bone mass in men at high risk for fracture receiving androgen deprivation therapy for nonmetastatic
prostate cancer, in these patients Prolia also reduced the incidence of vertebral fractures.
Denosumab (Prolia
®
& Xgeva
®
)
Page 21 of 22
UnitedHealthcare Commercial Medical Benefit Drug Policy
Effective 04/01/2024
Proprietary Information of UnitedHealthcare. Copyright 2024 United HealthCare Services, Inc.
Treatment to increase bone mass in women at high risk for fracture receiving adjuvant aromatase inhibitor therapy for
breast cancer.
Xgeva (denosumab) is a RANK ligand inhibitor indicated for the following uses
14
:
Prevention of skeletal-related events in patients with multiple myeloma and in patients with bone metastases from solid
tumors.
Treatment of adults and skeletally mature adolescents with giant cell tumor of bone that is unresectable or where surgical
resection is likely to result in severe morbidity.
Treatment of hypercalcemia of malignancy refractory to bisphosphonate therapy.
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS)
Medicare does not have a National Coverage Determination (NCD) for denosumab (Prolia
®
& Xgeva
®
). Local Coverage
Determinations/Articles (LCDs)/LCAs) exist. Refer to the LCDs/LCAs for Bisphosphonates (Intravenous [IV]) and Monoclonal
Antibodies in the Treatment of Osteoporosis and Their Other Indications and Drugs and Biologicals, Coverage of, for Label and
Off-Label Uses.
In general, Medicare covers outpatient (Part B) drugs that are furnished "incident to" a physician's service provided that the
drugs are not usually self-administered by the patients who take them. Refer to the Medicare Benefit Policy Manual, Chapter 15,
§50 - Drugs and Biologicals.
(Accessed October 9, 2023)
References
1. American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists/American College of Endocrinology Clinical Practice Guidelines for the
Diagnosis and Treatment of Postmenopausal Osteoporosis – 2020 Update. Endocr Pract. 2020;26(1):1-46.
2. North American Menopause Society (NAMS). Management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women: 2021 position
statement of The North American Menopause Society. Menopause 2021;28(9):973-997.
3. Cosman F, de Beur SJ, LeBoff MS, et al. National Osteoporosis Foundation. Clinician’s Guide to Prevention and Treatment
of Osteoporosis. Washington, DC: National Osteoporosis Foundation; 2014. Osteoporos Int. 2014 Oct;25(10):2359-81.
Epub 2014 Aug. 15.
4. Hodsman AB, Bauer DC, Dempster DW, et al. Parathyroid hormone and teriparatide for the treatment of osteoporosis: a
review of the evidence and suggested guidelines for its use. Endocr Rev. 2005(5):688-703.
5. Hodsman A, Papaioannou A, Cranney A. Clinical practice guidelines for the use of parathyroid hormone in the treatment of
osteoporosis. CMAJ. 2006;175(1):48.
6. Florence R, Allen S, Benedict L, Compo R, Jensen A, Kalogeropoulou D, Kearns A, Larson S, Mallen E, O'Day K, Peltier A,
Webb B. Diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis. Bloomington (MN): Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement (ICSI);
2013 Jul. 87 p.
7. WHO FRAX tool: https://frax.shef.ac.uk/FRAX/. Accessed December 30, 2022.
8. Smith MR, et al. Denosumab in men receiving androgen-deprivation therapy for prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2009 Aug
20;361(8):745-55. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0809003. Epub 2009 Aug 11.
9. Langdahl BL, et al. A 24-month study evaluating the efficacy and safety of denosumab for the treatment of men with low
bone mineral density: results from the ADAMO trial. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015 Apr;100(4):1335-42.Epub 2015 Jan 21.
10. Orwoll E. et al. A randomized, placebo-controlled study of the effects of denosumab for the treatment of men with low bone
mineral density. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012 Sep;97(9):3161-9. doi: 10.1210/jc.2012-1569. Epub 2012 Jun 21.
11. Brown JP et al. Comparison of the effect of denosumab and alendronate on BMD and biochemical markers of bone
turnover in postmenopausal women with low bone mass: a randomized, blinded, phase 3 trial. J Bone Miner Res. 2009
Jan;24(1):153-61.
12. Reid IR et al. Effects of denosumab on bone histomorphometry: the FREEDOM and STAND studies. J Bone Miner Res.
2010 Oct;25(10):2256-65.
Denosumab (Prolia
®
& Xgeva
®
)
Page 22 of 22
UnitedHealthcare Commercial Medical Benefit Drug Policy
Effective 04/01/2024
Proprietary Information of UnitedHealthcare. Copyright 2024 United HealthCare Services, Inc.
13. Prolia [prescribing information]. Thousand Oaks, CA: Amgen Inc.; May 2022.
14. Xgeva [prescribing information]. Thousand Oaks, CA: Amgen Inc.; June 2020.
15. The NCCN Drugs and Biologics Compendium
®
(NCCN Compendium
®
). Available at www.nccn.org. Accessed October 3,
2023.
16. Henry DH, Costa L, Goldwasser F, et al. Randomized, double-blind study of denosumab versus zoledronic acid in the
treatment of bone metastases in patients with advanced cancer (excluding breast and prostate cancer) or multiple
myeloma. J Clin Oncol. 2011 Mar 20;29(9):1125-32.
17. Henry D, Vadhan-Raj S, Hirsh V, et al. Delaying skeletal-related events in a randomized phase 3 study of denosumab versus
zoledronic acid in patients with advanced cancer: an analysis of data from patients with solid tumors. Support Care Cancer.
2014 Mar;22(3):679-87.
18. Saag KG, Wagman RB, Geusens P, Adachi JD, Messina OD, Emkey R, Chapurlat R, Wang A, Pannacciulli N, Lems WF.
Denosumab versus risedronate in glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis: a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, active-
controlled, double-dummy, non-inferiority study. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2018;6(6):445.
19. Buckley L et al. 2017 American College of Rheumatology Guideline for the Prevention and Treatment of Glucocorticoid-
Induced Osteoporosis. Arthritis & Rheumatology. Vol. 69, No. 8, August 2017; 69(8):15211537.
20. Fizazi K, Carducci M, Smith M et al. Denosumab versus zoledronic acid for treatment of bone metastases in men with
castration-resistant prostate cancer: a randomised, double-blind study. Lancet 2011; 377:813.
21. Kendler DL, Chines A, Brandi ML, et al. The risk of subsequent osteoporotic fractures is decreased in subjects
experiencing fracture while on denosumab: results from the FREEDOM and FREEDOM Extension studies. Osteoporos Int.
2019 Jan;30(1):71-78.
Policy History/Revision Information
Date
Summary of Changes
04/01/2024
Applicable Codes
Prolia
Added ICD-10 diagnosis codes C61, C79.81, Z79.52, Z79.811, and Z79.818
Supporting Information
Archived previous policy version 2024D0068M
Instructions for Use
This Medical Benefit Drug Policy provides assistance in interpreting UnitedHealthcare standard benefit plans. When deciding
coverage, the member specific benefit plan document must be referenced as the terms of the member specific benefit plan
may differ from the standard plan. In the event of a conflict, the member specific benefit plan document governs. Before using
this policy, please check the member specific benefit plan document and any applicable federal or state mandates.
UnitedHealthcare reserves the right to modify its Policies and Guidelines as necessary. This Medical Benefit Drug Policy is
provided for informational purposes. It does not constitute medical advice.
This Medical Benefit Drug Policy may also be applied to Medicare Advantage plans in certain instances. In the absence of a
Medicare National Coverage Determination (NCD), Local Coverage Determination (LCD), or other Medicare coverage guidance,
CMS allows a Medicare Advantage Organization (MAO) to create its own coverage determinations, using objective evidence-
based rationale relying on authoritative evidence (Medicare IOM Pub. No. 100-16, Ch. 4, §90.5).
UnitedHealthcare may also use tools developed by third parties, such as the InterQual
®
criteria, to assist us in administering
health benefits. UnitedHealthcare Medical Benefit Drug Policies are intended to be used in connection with the independent
professional medical judgment of a qualified health care provider and do not constitute the practice of medicine or medical
advice.