UCLA
American Indian Culture and Research Journal
Title
The Powwow as a Public Arena for Negotiating Unity and Diversity in
American Indian Life
Permalink
https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1vh778zb
Journal
American Indian Culture and Research Journal , 20(4)
ISSN
0161-6463
Author
Mattern, Mark
Publication Date
1996-09-01
DOI
10.17953
Copyright Information
This work is made available under the terms of a Creative Commons
Attribution-NonCommercial License, availalbe at
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Peer reviewed
eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library
University of California
AMERICAN INDIAN CULTURE AND RESEARCH IOURNAL
20:4
(1996)
283-201
The Powwow as
a
Public Arena
for Negotiating Unity and Diversity
in American Indian Life
MARK MATTERN
INTRODUCTION
The powwow’ is often cited for its importance in contemporary
Indian life as a constituent of tribal and Indian identity, and as a
unifying force in Indian life.* Although each of these testimonies
may be true, each tells an incomplete story. Each downplays or
ignores entirely the disagreements and conflicts that occur within
the powwow grounds and that swirl around powwow practices.
Each erases the multiple differences among Indians and implies
that Indian identity and commitments are simply reinforced and
reproduced through powwow practices, rather than debated,
negotiated, and changed. Each also erases the constitutive presence
of power and politics within the powwow arena. Powwows are
constituents of identity and
a
unifying force in contemporary Indian
life, but they are also arenas of conflict and disagreement in which
power plays an important role and in which Indians implicitly
and explicitly debate their identity and mutual commitments.
In this article
I
will argue that the powwow can best be under-
stood in these dual, paradoxical terms: It plays a unifying role in
Indian life while providing a public arena for negotiation of
differences and disagreements. The unifying role played by pow-
Mark Mattern is an assistant professor of political science at Chapman Univer-
sity, Orange, California.
183
184
AMERICAN INDIAN CULTURE AND RESEARCH JOURNAL
wows is especially significant in light of the diversity within and
among tribes. Although others have argued that the powwow
plays a unifying role in this context of diversity, much can
nevertheless still be added to our understanding of the specific
practices that foster this unifying role. In the first part of this
article,
I
will examine specific powwow practices in light of their
unifying role.
I
will interpret the powwow as a communicative
arena in which common experiences help create and sustain a
common ground of memory, experience, identity, and commit-
ment out of disparate experiences and identities.
On
the other hand, the powwow is also a public arena where
Indians explicitly and implicitly negotiate their differences and
their disagreements over their identifying traits and mutual com-
mitments. This role of enabling the negotiation of differences and
disagreements helps manage the tension between unity and
dibersity, making Indian communities more resilient and adapt-
able. As in other public arenas, the role of power at a powwow is
central in helping determine both the nature and the outcome of
disagreement and negotiation.
Throughout this article
I
will be using the terms
Indian,
Ameri-
can
Indian,
and
iizdigenous
people
to refer to indigenous people of
Minnesota and western Wisconsin and, unless I say otherwise,
only those people. The powwow practices that I describe should
be viewed as specific to the region and not necessarily generaliz-
able beyond the region. Whenever possible,
I
will refer to specific
tribes. Although this paper focuses primarily on the powwow
experiences of Ojibwe, Dakota, Winnebago, and Menominee
tribes of Minnesota and western Wisconsin, it is often difficult to
speak only in terms of select tribes. Members of many different
tribes and bands live in Minnesota and western Wisconsin, espe-
cially
in
urban areas such as the Twin Cities. Many of these people
attend powwows in the area, most of which are now intertribal.
THE POWWOW AS
A
UNIFYING FORCE IN INDIAN LIFE3
Indian tribes differ widely in tradition, custom, commitment, and
interests. Multiple differences also exist within each tribe. Ac-
cording to one qibwe expression,
”If
you put five qibwe in a
room together, there will be at least ten different opinions on any
~ubject.”~ With the exception of powwows hosted by supratribal
and intertribal organizations such as the American Indian Move-
ment (AIM) or university-based American Indian centers, pow-
The
I-’o7uzirozu
ns
n
Public
Aretin
185
wows are usually hosted by a single tribe. However, most modern
powwows are attended by members of several or more tribes. As
many as
sixty
or more tribes from the United States and Canada
may be represented at a large powwow. Although there are
significant differences between tribes, powwow practices among
tribes of Minnesota and western Wisconsin remain largely the
same, enabling me to write at a certain level of generalization. The
practices that I emphasize are generic to powwow experience in
the region. Some of the specific powwow elements and practices
that play a unifying role in this context of diversity include the
philosophy and spirituality that underlie powwow practices; the
emcee; music and dance; and explicit community-affirming prac-
tices such as feasts, honoring, giveaways, and rituals of inclusion.
PHILOSOPHY AND SPIRITUALITY
Although contemporary powwows include many secular dimen-
sions, they are supported by philosophical and spiritual tradi-
tions that emphasize unity and inclusiveness.s For example, the
physical space in which communicative interactions occur, a
circle, is itself rich with significance for this discussion of Ameri-
can Indian unity and diversity. Among Indians of Minnesota and
western Wisconsin, the circle carries spiritual significance as an
embodiment of all living creatures, and relations within this circle
are characterized by unity, harmony, and inclusiveness. This
imagery of the circle permeates powwow experience. The dance
arena
is
always set up as a circle, or an oval if the physical space
will not accommodate a circle. This includes powwows held
indoors in gymnasiums, auditoriums, church basements, and
other square or rectangular physical spaces. Musical performance
is organized into drum groups-groups of approximately four to
ten drummer-singers
who
encircle the drum in performance.
These drum groups set up either in the center of the dance arena
or around its perimeter. Dancers move in a circle around the
arena. Around the dance arena are seats for the audience, and
around these seats are various food and craft vendors. Each
powwow
is
thus a material embodiment of the underlying phi-
losophy represented by the circle, and participation in a powwow
signifies membership in the circle.
At
the core of powwow experience in Minnesota and western
Wisconsin is the drum, which, in American Indian philosophy in
this region, symbolizes the heart
of
all living creatures and of
186
AMERICAN INDIAN
CULTURE
AND RESEARCH
TOURNAL
indigenous people. As some see it, without the drum there would
be no powwow and no indigenous people. In secular terms, the
powwow relies on the drum for its central activities of singing and
dancing. Since the drum is ”the heartbeat of our sacred circle,”
and since the ”sacred circle” refers to an inclusive wholeness of
humans and all living creatures, the drum also has a deep spiritual
significance in American Indian philosophy. It is considered the
heartbeat of all living creatures and, “if ever that heartbeat should
discontinue, we are gone, everyone is gone.’16
Of course, not everyone brings philosophical or spiritual inter-
ests to a powwow. Although many, perhaps most, Indians can
recite the philosophical and spiritual meaning underlying pow-
wow practices, it is unclear how many take it seriously. As we will
see later, some Indians are concerned with a trend that they
perceive of an increasing secularization of the powwow. Regard-
less of the philosophical and spiritual orientation of participants,
the powwow represents for most people a place where differences
can be set aside, at least temporarily, in favor of fellowship and
unity. Adding a philosophical and spiritual dimension intensifies
this commitment
to,
and experience of, fellowship and unity for
some participants.
THE
EMCEE
In addition to his (the vast majority of emcees are men) role of
announcing the order of events and keeping the powwow mov-
ing, the emcee plays a central role in informing participants and
observers of the significance
of
the events and practices as they
unfold, and in (selectively) enforcing tribal and Indian customs.
The emcee frequently explains what is happening and the reason
for it. Much of this is directed at non-Indians and members
of
other tribes, but it is also intended to remind tribal members
of
the
meaning of their practices. Some emcees accomplish this through
appeals to collective memory, exhorting listeners to “remember.”
Collective memory is also reinforced in the powwow program
guide with articles on tribal history, dedications to prominent
tribal members, and central events in indigenous peoples’ history
such as Wounded Knee. At other times the emcee enforces tribal
customs and traditions with statements such as “children should
not be carried in the dance arena” and
If
dogs are not allowed in the
powwow arena unless they arrive in a cooking pot,” and exhorts
participants to “watch the leaders and do what they
The
Powwow
as
a
Public
Arena
187
In making public and explicit some of the assumptions and
beliefs that underlie powwow practices, the emcee recalls to
participants’ minds the significance of their actions, including,
sometimes, their philosophical and spiritual dimensions, and
reinforces collective memories. The articulation of shared memo-
ries reminds tribal members and others of common histories.
Overall, the emcee contributes to a common awareness among
powwow participants of the significance of their actions, of their
similarities and differences, of partially common histories and
traditions, and of partially common interests and commitments.
Of course, different emcees handle their role differently. Some
emcees limit their role to moving things along and entertainment,
while others are more likely to offer explanations and commen-
tary. The emcee and other featured speakers also sometimes
endorse particular stands on key political issues such as American
Indian self-determination, sovereignty, tribal treaty rights, and
the environment. This is especially true of the powwows orga-
nized by AIM, but often is true for other powwows as well. The
articulation and rearticulation of these issues contribute to a
common awareness among participants of political issues facing
them at tribal and supratribal levels.
MUSIC AND DANCE
Beliefs and commitments that foster unity are embedded in the
music and dancing. The aesthetics of the music and dancing,
which emphasize repetition and unison, reinforce the commit-
ment to unity represented by the circle in which they take place.
The most common rhythms are straightforward duple, with
occasional “honor” beats struck on the offbeat to honor Mother
Earth or a specific person, event, or idea. The musicians drum and
sing entirely in unison except for the leader’s brief solo introduc-
tions. One measure of the quality of performance is the extent to
which the musicians achieve a tight, cohesive sound. Although
songs vary widely in intent, meaning, style, and sound, the song
structure remains standard within each type of song. The
so-
called incomplete repetition form, or AA/BCD/BCD, is the most
common and, like the other song forms, is quite short.8 Thus, in
order to play for a dance, the song is repeated in “pushups” a
designated or requested number of times, normally four or five
times but usually longer during a grand entry and sometimes
longer for popular dances.
188
AMERICAN INDIAN CULTURE AND RESEARCH JOURNAL
The drumming is associated with both aesthetic and spiritual
power. Whatever the drumming might lack in complexity it
makes up for in intensity and forcefulness of expression and
reception. In his study
of
Menominee powwow music,
J.S.
Slotkin
refers to "the tremendous dominating drumbeat which makes
everything vibrate to it.
. . .
I
never had such a sense of rhythm
penetrating The unison singing, when done with skill and
conviction, adds power and forcefulness to this shared affective
experience. The net effect is a potent physical and, for some,
emotional experience shared by musicians, dancers, and listeners.
Everyone in the powwow grounds shares the physical experience
of hearing and physically feeling the drum. It focuses attention
and experience, contributing to a sharing of experience. Powwow
participants share this experience in qualitatively different ways
and to varying degrees of intensity, but most find it hard to ignore.
For people who bring spiritual interests to the powwow, the drum
is also "the most important material embodiment
of
[spiritual]
power."'" Since the drum is considered the heartbeat of Mother
Earth, beating on the drum puts people in touch with spiritual
powers. It is a form of communication between humans and
spiritual powers, a means of summoning strength from the spiri-
tual world.
The "intertribal" dance is the most common social, noncontest
dance. Anyone can dance, including non-Indians and people
wearing street clothes. The step is a basic one-two, touch-step
requiring only minimal expertise, but experienced dancers some-
times display their more advanced steps during an intertribal.
There are several dancer categories on the Northern Plains pow-
wow circuit, each characterized by a distinct set of stylistic norms
and movements. These include, for men, traditional, grass, and
fancy dancing and, for women, traditional, jingle dress, and fancy
shawl dancing. Individual expression occurs, but within the
parameters of each type of dance. Despite the variations in style,
each dance builds on multiple repetitions of the simple one-two,
touch-step that characterizes the grand entries and the intertribal
dancing. Variations are woven around the basic step according to
the artistic fancy of the dancer. For most dances, the dancers must
pay close attention to the singers in order to stop dancing at the
same time that the singers stop. This is especially true for contest
dancing, where points are deducted or the dancer is disqualified
for not stopping on cue. Attention
is
thus necessarily focused
intently on the singing and the drumming in order to follow the
The
Powwow
as
a
Public
Arena
189
song and know where the singers are in the song. This is made
easier by the fact that most songs have a similar structure and that
the musicians provide various cues such as slight changes in
drumming patterns.
These aesthetic qualities of repetition and unison found in
powwow music and dancing complement and reinforce in sound
and motion the philosophy underlying the powwow experience
of unity and inclusiveness. They add impetus and reinforce them
by making them material. They encourage a concentration and
focusing of attention, and intensify the experience of sharing
during the powwow, as different participants engage simulta-
neously, if temporarily and at varying levels of engagement, in the
central practices that define the powwow. The net effect is at least
a partial unifying and integrating of experience within the pow-
wow grounds."
EXPLICIT COMMUNITY-AFFIRMING PRACTICES
Several powwow practices explicitly affirm and reinforce unity
among Indians. One practice that occurs frequently at a powwow
and that reinforces the implied and explicit commitments to
respect and fellowship within powwow experience is the custom
of "honoring." Implicit forms of honoring include the grand
entries-the inaugural events occurring several times during a
powwow in which the dancers "enter the circle" to the sound of
singing and drumming-which are led by honored military vet-
erans. Many instances of honoring occur explicitly. Participants
generally funnel their requests through the emcee to honor a
relative, friend, or member of another tribe,
so
it is usually done
publicly and often is accompanied by a giveaway. The giveaways
themselves are explicit expressions of honor and appreciation for
one or more individuals. This custom of honoring plays the role
of affirming and cementing social relationships among various
tribal members. It is a formal means of publicly acknowledging an
important social relationship, and of expressing an enduring
commitment to other members of the tribe and, sometimes, to
members of other tribes.
Various formal and informal mechanisms are used to invite
inclusion and participation in the powwow circle. For example,
the emcee typically issues an explicit invitation to join the circle,
welcoming tribal members, members of visiting tribes, non-Indi-
190
AMERICAN INDIAN
CULTURE
AND
RESEARCH
TOURNAL
ans, and other prominent visitors and encouraging everyone to
participate. Other powwow practices such as the communal
feasts to which everyone is invited reinforce this invitation to join
and participate. Other mechanisms for inviting or signalling
inclusion involve ritualized use of singing and dancing. For
example, grand entries are led by military veterans, signaling to
powwow participants their integration into the circle and their
place of honor within it. This holds special significance to Vietnam
veterans, for whom reintegration into
U.S.
life has sometimes
proven difficult. Other ritualized welcomes can occur at the
request of powwow participants who wish to “return to the
circle” themselves or to invite or signal another’s return or en-
trance into the circle. One such event occurred at the
1993
Prairie
Island Dakota powwow. A young man who had been ”out
of
the
circle” for six years wished to return. Working through the emcee,
he announced a special song and dance, accompanied by a give-
away and a public honoring of his grandfather, to mark his return.
Accompanied by
two
special friends and followed by tribal elders
and family members, he began dancing slowly around the arena.
People from the audience entered the arena to greet the young
man and welcome him back, then joined the dancers at the rear. As
they danced around the arena, slowly increasing in number,
family members strewed blankets, shawls, and money around the
arena, which members of the audience were free to pick up. The
arena gradually filled up with tribal members dancing the young
man back into the circle and with others participating in the
giveaway. During this event, the emcee told the young man’s
story of falling away from the circle and his reasons for wishing to
return, articulated the importance of this public affirmation of his
return, and encouraged everyone to “come down and welcome
him back.”12
The invitation to participate is not unlimited. While an effort is
made to make the powwow experience inclusive, participation
requires at least partial respect for and adoption of the norms of
the host tribe or organization. The host tribe expects visitors to
respect its customs and behave more or less in accordance with
them. Also, financial considerations partially underlie the com-
mitment to welcoming and inclusion. The powwow committee
often needs the gate receipts of members of other tribes and of
non-Indians to pay the bills, which include the honorariums for
dancers and singers, the feasts, and prize money if it is a contest
powwow.
The
Powwozo
as
a
Public
Arena
191
***
In daily and weekly powwow experience, these practices rein-
force and recreate existing beliefs and commitments, and foster
their common possession. This process of "making common"
occurs
at
both tribal and supratribal levels. Specifically tribal
identity is recreated and reinforced at a powwow through the
articulation of distinctively tribal commitments, as well as through
the frequent references to tribal memory, history, and tradition,
and through the reinforcement of tribal customs and styles of
singing and dancing.
A
similar process of identification occurs for
many across tribal boundaries at a powwow through the articu-
lation of commitments that span tribes, through the development
and reinforcement of common memories and histories, and
through the occasional references to political, social, cultural, and
economic issues that span different tribes. The partial consolida-
tion of musical and dance styles that characterizes contemporary
Northern Plains powwow practice13 both reflects this growth of a
supratribal identity and helps create it. Identification at a
supratribal level does not replace tribal identification. Some pow-
wow participants identify
only
with their particular tribe. For
others, a supratribal identification, representing points of com-
monality spanning tribal differences, complements their tribal
identification without replacing it.
In sum, the powwow is a unifying force in American Indian life
at both tribal and supratribal levels. It gathers diverse Indians
together where communicative interactions can take place that,
taken together, define a partly common ground of identity, belief,
and commitment. The practices that define the powwow experi-
ence-the singing and dancing, the feasts and giveaways, the fry
bread and Indian tacos-together help define a sense of "who we
are," of what it means to be both a member of a particular tribe and
an American Indian. In affirming and recreating tribal and
supratribal identity and commitment, powwow practices con-
tribute to social cohesion and the survival of Indians as Indians.
Participants leave a powwow with a reinforced sense of what it
means to be
a
tribal Indian and an American Indian.
POWER AND POLITICS IN POWWOWS: NEGOTIATING
AMERICAN INDIAN IDENTITY AND COMMITMENT
Thus far
I
have treated the powwow as an arena in which unity
and social cohesion among American Indians is fostered. While
192
AMERICAN INDIAN
CULTURE
AND RESEARCH JOURNAL
acknowledging differences between individuals and tribes,
I
have posed this discussion in terms that downplay the role of
power and that are free of disagreement and conflict. Indeed,
most powwow practice concerns the routine reinforcement of
existing beliefs and practices. However, the powwow arena is
constituted partly by differences and disagreements that provoke
conflict and challenges to existing beliefs and practices. These
disagreements sometimes fuel explicit debate over powwow
practice as Indians discuss among themselves the relative merits
of
different practices. The debate occurs within the powwow
arena and on its sidelines, among members of powwow organiz-
ing committees, in informal interactions among powwow partici-
pants, and in discussions and arguments entirely outside of
powwow grounds. Sometimes these disagreements are worked
out directly within powwow practice, while others are not. Also,
sometimes the debate occurs in wordless challenges to existing
practices and the responses by others. Since these various pow-
wow practices embody communal identity and commitments,
challenges to them and debates over them are, by extension,
challenges to and debates over communal identity and commit-
ment. In other words, Indians do not simply reaffirm and rein-
force their mutual identity and commitments through powwow
practices; they negotiate them.
In this light, the powwow can be viewed as a public arena of
negotiation and deliberation over American Indian identity and
commitment. The outcome of these disagreements and delibera-
tions depends at least partly on power, understood to mean both
domination (control of others) and capacity (possession of the
abilities and resources necessary to formulate goals and bring
them to fruition).I4
In
the following pages,
I
will discuss disagree-
ments and conflicts generated around gender differences, the
tension between secular and spiritual interests, and the relations
between Indians and non-Indians.
GENDER DIFFERENCES
Powwow practices are gendered
in
many ways, and these gendered
practices both reveal and reinforce relations of power between
genders. This is apparent
in
music and dance performance. Music
performance is organized into drum groups, or groups of approx-
imately four to ten male singers who sit around the drum and beat
on it with a drumstick as they sing. In Canadian tribes and tribes
Thc
Powzoow
as
a
Public
Arena
193
of the western and northwestern United States, women sometimes
join or form drum groups, but in Minnesota and western Wiscon-
sin women rarely participate in drum groups. Women’s roles are
generally limited to occasionally ”helping the men” musically by
singing along an octave above the men’s voices. Day-to-day
musical performance implicitly reinforces the commitment to this
form of gender exclusion. Some women have attempted to chal-
lenge this practice of exclusion by forming all women drum
groups. However, their efforts have met with limited acceptance,
and today women are not active participants in drum groups in
the Minnesota and western Wisconsin powwow circuit.I5
A
more successful attempt by women to challenge gender roles
occurred in powwow dancing. Traditionally, male dancing is
athletic and vigorous, while female dancing is relatively demure
and restrained. However, one of the most popular contemporary
forms of dancing for girls and young women, fancy shawl danc-
ing, involves spirited and athletic movements. Fancy shawl danc-
ing is a relative newcomer to the powwow scene, introduced
within the last thirty-five years by girls and young women who
persisted in its practice in the face of opposition by many who
believed that its spirited athleticism was inconsistent with tradi-
tional expectations of women. Now it is an accepted form of dance
on the Northern Plains powwow circuit.16
The outcome of challenges to gendered practices depends on
relative power. The attempts by some women to redefine their
status within powwow practices depend partly on the support or
nonsupport of the emcee, who is responsible for articulating and
enforcing tribal customs-a role that most emcees play selec-
tively. The emcee represents a dominant voice, chosen by a
dominant powwow organizing committee, and may or may not
fairly represent the interests and views of the entire tribe. The
attempts by some women to redefine gender relations also de-
pends on their ability to enlist the support
of
other women and
men, and to challenge other related commitments such as the
commitment to unity that pervades powwow experience and
discourages participants from raising public challenges to pre-
vailing norms and practices.
SECULAR
V.
SPIRITUAL INTERESTS
Another point
of
disagreement that sometimes surfaces in con-
temporary powwow experience is over the relative weight in
194
AMERICAN INDIAN CULTURE AND RESEARCH JOURNAL
powwow experience of secular v. spiritual concerns. Some Indi-
ans fear that the powwow is being increasingly secularized,
denuded of its spiritual content. One expression of this disagree-
ment concerns the use of the eagle bone whistle or similar carved
whistles. These whistles are carried by select military veterans
and, in traditional usage, are blown during the start of spiritual
ceremonies in order to call in the power of the spirits. However,
some of these whistle carriers now also use it for secular purposes
during powwow music and dance performance. In contemporary
powwow practice, a dancer with a whistle will sometimes blow it
in order to signal to the members of the performing drum group
that they should play another pass through the song. Given that
twenty or more drums may show up to play at a powwow, the
time allotted to each drum can be very small. One way for dancers
who have been honored as whistle carriers to prolong the play of
favorites is to blow their whistles.
Some
powwow participants
object to this secular use of the whistle, arguing that it dilutes its
spiritual significance. Sometimes, the emcee or a spiritual elder
will interrupt the dancing to publicly admonish the whistle carri-
ers for using their whistles in this secular way.”
Another example of this disagreement over the relative weight
of secular v. spiritual matters concerns the growing prominence
of financial concerns in powwow experience. As the number of
powwows multiplies, there is more and more competition among
powwow organizing committees to attract dancers and singers.
One way to lure them is to offer more prize money and honorari-
ums. The development of a casino economy among some Indian
populations has made considerably more money available to
devote to powwows. Some Indians fear that these developments
encourage greater emphasis on financial incentives and less em-
phasis on spiritual, cultural, and political incentives for partici-
pating in powwows. Some Indians also believe that the increasing
emphasis on contest dancing and singing introduces unhealthy
competition into the dance arena, which disrupts the ”good
medicine” of friendship and fellowship. Contest powwows are
observably disruptive of at least some traditional practices such as
the giveaways, which are likely to be shunted aside to early
morning hours, and the social dancing, which must be
deemphasized in order to free enough time for the contest danc-
ing.
A related disagreement concerns the practice associated with
some contest powwows of making the powwow a ”closed drum”
The
Powzuozu
as
a
Public
Arena
195
event. Traditionally, the powwow organizing committee sim-
ply
issues
a
general invitation to drum groups to show up and
register to play on a first-come-first-served basis, sometimes up
to an advertised limit of twenty to thirty drum groups. Some of
the drum groups that show up to play are composed of seasoned
and accomplished veteran musicians, while others are composed
of amateurs whose musical performance may be well short of
accomplished. In traditional practice, no attempt is made to favor
drum groups, and musical performance simply occurs on a ro-
tating basis. In hopes of assuring better quality musical perfor-
mance and attracting more and better dancers, some organizing
committees now hire one or sometimes two or three exceptional
drum groups to play the role of host drum(s). Some powwow
organizing committees further limit musical participation by
designating their powwow as a “closed drum” powwow, mean-
ing that only invited drums whose musical performance is as-
sured can play. This is a controversial practice, since many believe
that it contradicts the powwow ethics of welcoming and inclu-
siveness.
Indians also disagree over whether
it
is appropriate to politi-
cize the powwow. Some Indians distance themselves from any
political uses whatsoever of the powwow or powwow practices
such as drumming. These Indians argue against political uses of
powwow practices on the grounds that politics is divisive and this
contradicts the ethic
of
unity and the spiritual dimensions (which
emphasize wholeness and unity) that they believe should per-
vade powwow experience. They also object to the introduction of
political themes by the emcee or by others. In contrast to these
Indians who disavow any political significance or use of the
powwow and powwow practices, others explicitly and pointedly
introduce political themes and issues into the powwow arena and
carry the powwow drum into other explicitly political arenas such
as demonstrations. This is especially true of the powwows orga-
nized by members of AIM.
In this ongoing disagreement over secular v. spiritual concerns
in powwow experience, the secular power of factors such as
casino money plays an increasingly influential role in determin-
ing the nature of powwows. Especially when viewed in the
context of economic marginalization experienced by many Indi-
ans, it is not surprising that this secular power often overwhelms
the power wielded by spiritual elders and others who are deter-
mined to maintain the spiritual character of powwows. Similarly,
196
AMERICAN INDIAN CULTURE AND RESEARCH TOURNAL
the spiritual authority of elders is sometimes overwhelmed by the
wholly secular interest held by many, especially youth, in having
a good time dancing to the best drum groups, whose play is
prolonged by blowing an eagle bone whistle. Finally, members of
AIM sometimes enlist the power of the media in publicizing their
political goals through powwows or powwow practices. For
example, members of AIM garnered national television attention
during the
1991
baseball World Series and the
1992
football
Superbowl, both held at the Humphrey Metrodome in Minneapo-
lis, by organizing political demonstrations
to
protest the use of
American Indian names and symbols as mascots: Braves and
Redskins, respectively. Demonstrators at both events were led by
American Indian drummers who were present to summon spiri-
tual and aesthetic power, to focus attention, and to encourage
solidarity. These events inevitably encouraged national audi-
ences to associate American Indian drumming with political
protest, whether or not the majority of Indians view the associa-
tion as appropriate.
RELATIONS BETWEEN INDIANS AND NON-INDIANS
Disagreements over the appropriate relation between Indians
and non-Indians are sometimes negotiated
in
and around pow-
wow practices. While the invitation issued by the emcee to non-
Indians to participate in powwow practices appears genuine, it
is
sometimes uncertain how to handle situations that arise such as
inappropriate dancing or photography
of
dancers. Although the
majority of non-Indians who attend powwows may behave re-
spectfully and appropriately, some do not. A common sight at a
powwow is a non-Indian snapping photographs of dancers. This
strikes some Indians, especially those for whom the powwow
carries spiritual significance, as inappropriate, especially when
the photographer actually gets in the way. Some Indian dancers,
on the other hand, are apparently happy to oblige requests for
posed photographs. Another common sight at some powwows is
the attempt by some non-Indians to participate
in
the social
dancing. While some fit well into the dancing, others stand out by
attempting to improvise. Sometimes inappropriate behavior is
studiously ignored, sometimes it is guardedly ridiculed, and
sometimes the emcee or others may intervene.
It
is also uncertain if the invitation issued tonon-Indians should
extend to participation in drum groups. Participation by non-
The
Pozvwow
as
a
Public
Arena
197
Indians in drum groups
is
rare in Minnesota and western Wiscon-
sin.
My
research turned up only one non-Indian who regularly
participates in
a
drum group on the powwow circuit in Minnesota
and western Wisconsin, and his presence occasionally provoked
controversy as some Indians questioned his presence and his
right to join in the practice of "drum-hopping" in which drum-
mers circulate among various drum groups.
Indian relations with non-Indians are also partly negotiated at
powwows in discussions and debates over the best response to
the appropriation of Indian culture by non-Indians. One example,
already noted, is the use of Indian symbols and names by sports
teams. At some powwows one can observe simultaneously a
representative from AIM decrying such uses and several Indian
youth wearing sports caps and jackets imprinted with the offend-
ing logos. It may be tempting, on the one hand, to discount the
wearing of these sports logos as the ignorance of youth or, on the
other hand, to romanticize it as a defiant gesture of reappropria-
tion. These may both be true. However, another plausible inter-
pretation would simply emphasize that some Indians do not
object to the use of these names by sports teams. The powwow is
apparently open and flexible enough to accommodate these com-
peting views on this issue, even when AIM is the powwow
organizer. Another example of disagreement over the best re-
sponse to the appropriation of Indian culture
by
non-Indians
concerns the use by New Age spiritualists of American Indian
practices such as drumming and sweat lodges. Some Indians
cooperate in these appropriations for various reasons, including
to make a profit and to help non-Indians gain spiritual guidance
and understanding. On the other hand, other Indians criticize
these practices on grounds of cultural appropriation and theft of
key identifying symbols and practices which, many believe, de-
grade and dilute their significance.
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION
Focusing on specific powwow practices enables us to see more
clearly how the powwow fosters at least some unity and social
cohesion among American Indians. However, it
is
important
to
move beyond this focus on unity and social cohesion to a recog-
nition of the multiple differences that are present at a powwow,
and the disagreements that arise from them. For most of these
disagreements, there are no formal guidelines that could serve as
198
AMERICAN INDIAN CULTURE AND RESEARCH JOURNAL
decision rules. Each disagreement is typically subject to debate
and negotiation. The disagreements are worked out in various
ways ranging from mutual tolerance to wordless acts of rebellion
to explicit forms of conflict and negotiation. Actual outcomes of
disagreements and conflict depend on multiple factors such as the
emcee and his mood or inclination on a particular issue, the
powwow organizing committee with its incomplete control over
powwow events, the tribe and its customs, the mix of participants,
and the relative power of different participants. The outcome of
these disagreements also changes from powwow to powwow,
even within a given tribe.
The powwow arena itself provides a communicative forum
where these challenges and debates can occur in various implicit
and explicit forms and processes. At other times, the powwow
stimulates debate on the sidelines of powwow experience. This
debate over powwow practices is, by extension, a debate over the
character of indigenous communities. Out of the implicit and
explicit negotiation surrounding powwow practices emerges
a
set of beliefs, commitments, and practices that partially determine
the identity of Indian Communities. This set of beliefs, commit-
ments, and practices remains subject to future challenges, sug-
gesting a shifting, dynamic tribal and Indian identity and a
shifting border between Indian and non-Indian.
While the dual roles of the powwow-fostering unity while
enabling disagreement and debate-may seem mutually incom-
patible, in fact they are complementary. The latter role of enabling
disagreement and debate contributes to the resiliency and flex-
ibility of Indian communities by helping manage the tension
between unity and diversity. Disagreement and conflict are in-
evitable among diverse peoples. The significance of the powwow
is partly understood in the terms that
I
have suggested of provid-
ing
a
public, communicative forum where differences can be
expressed and potentially negotiated. This marks, on balance,
a
sign of healthy, vital communities that have available some com-
municative arenas for working out at least some differences
without squelching them nor ignoring them. Powwow practices
provide
a
means of finding sufficient unity for survival and
partial prosperity in part because they enable and even foster
healthy disagreement and discussion over differences that divide
Indians.
The
Pozuzuozu
as
a
Public
Arena
199
NOTES
1.
The term
po7u7oow
derives from
a
Narragansett Algonquian word
pauau
initially meaning
a
gathering of medicine men for
a
curing ceremony but
gradually coming to mean
a
gathering of people to celebrate an important
event.
For example, R.D. Theisz argued that Lakota powwow songs and the
powwow practices in which they are set are the ”centerpiece” of contemporary
Lakota identity formation. See Theisz,
“Song
Texts and Their Performers: The
Centerpiece of Contemporary Lakota Identity Formulation,”
Great Plains Quar-
terly
7 (Spring 1987):
116-24.
According to Lynn Huenemann, music and dance
”are among the strongest overt expressions and measures
of
the perpetuation
of Indian life and culture.” See Huenemann, “Northern Plains Dance,” in
Native
American Dance: Ceremonies arid Social Traditions,
ed. Charlotte Heth (Washing-
ton, DC: National Museum of the American Indian, Smithsonian Institution
with Starwood Publishing, Inc., 1992), 125. Chris Roberts argues that the
powwow
is
the “heartbeat of Indian country” and exemplifies the “greatest
renaissance [in Indian culture] since the late 1800’s.” See Roberts,
Pozuzuozu
Country
(Helena, MT: American and World Geographic Publishing, 1992), 8.
Thomas Kavanagh sees powwow music and dance
as
establishing
an
“emo-
tional connection with the values
of
’Indianness.”’ See Kavanagh, ”Southern
Plains Dance: Tradition and Dynamics,” in
Native American Dance: Ceremonies
and Social Traditions,
112. Paul Robert Parthun argues that “the powwow
is
central to the feeling of Indianess [sic].” See Parthun, ”Ojibwe Music in Minne-
sota’’ (Ph.D. dissertation, University of Minnesota, 1976), 68. At least some
powwow participants claim
to
experience
a
“unity,” a “unity of spirit,”
a
“unified mix of people,” and
a
”feeling of belonging.” See David Hopkins,
“Truly
an
Explosion of Culture,”
The Circle
(October 1991), 19; testimonies in
Roberts,
Pozozuozu
Country,
25, 72, 112. According to the editor of
a
Canadian
Indian magazine,
Windspenker,
“[p]owwows break down the barriers and unify
all
who take part. Whether you’re from the southernmost regions of the United
States or far northern Canada-common ground
is
found at
a
powwow.“
(Quoted in Roberts,
Po7uzooru
Country,
9.)
The following portrait of powwow experience
is
based on the literature
on powwows and on my empirical study of powwows in Minnesota and
western Wisconsin during the period of approximately 1988-93. My interpre-
tation adopts the methodological approach of researchers such
as
Theodor
W.
Adorno,
lntrodciction to the Sociology of Music
(New York: Seabury Press, 1976);
John Chernoff,
African Rhythm
aiid
African Sensibility
(Chicago: University of
Chicago Press, 1979); Helen Kivnick,
Where
Is
the Way:
Song
and Struggle
in
South
Africa
(New York: Penguin
Books,
1990); and Susan McClary,
Feminine Endings:
Music, Gender
arid
Sexuality
(Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1991).
These researchers interpret musical practices in terms of how they model social
relationships and embody ethical and political commitments.
2.
3.
200
AMERICAN
INDIAN
CULTURE
AND
RESEARCH JOURNAL
4.
5.
For one use of this expression, see Joseph Geshick, ”Letter to the Editor,”
The Native American
Press
2:lO (17
July
1992),
4.
For one discussion of the philosophy and spiritualism that underlie
powwow practices in Minnesota and western Minnesota, see, for example,
Edward Benton-Benai’,
The Mishomis
Book:
The Voice
of
the Ojibway
(St. Paul,
MN: Red School House,
1988).
Although Benton-Benai”s discussion is tied to
the Qibwe, the main themes that are pertinent to this article remain the same
among tribes in Minnesota and western Wisconsin.
“Sixth Annual Heart of the Earth Contest Powwow Program” (Minne-
apolis,
1991), 2;
emcee, Lac Courte Oreilles 20th Annual Honor the Earth
Homecoming Powwow, recorded on tape by author,
16
July
1993,
Lac Courte
Oreilles, Wisconsin.
Emcee, Lac Courte Oreilles 20th Annual Honor the Earth Homecoming
Powwow. Children are not allowed to be carried in the dance arena because
doing
so
represents an invitation to Mother Earth to take the child into the spirit
world.
Dogs
used to “arrive in a cooking pot” for ceremonial dinners. Although
the use of dogs in ceremonial dinners is rare today, the custom of excluding live
dogs from the dance arena is sometimes still enforced. The third reference to
“watching the leaders and do what they do” appeared to be an attempt to
discourage inappropriate improvisation by non-Indians participating in a two-
step social dance.
For a discussion of this “incomplete repetition” form, see, for example,
Thomas Vennum, Jr.,
Ojibway Musicfrom Minnesota: Continuity and Change
(St.
Paul, MN: Minnesota Historical Society Press and the Minnesota State Arts
Board,
1989),
8.
9.
J.S. Slotkin,
The Menomini Powwow
(Milwaukee: Milwaukee Public
Museum,
1957), 14,15.
See also Gladys and Reginald Laubins, who argue that
in powwow music ”there is strength and power.
.
.
.
With several men around
the drum all striking it together, all singing at the top
of
their lungs, the stirring,
throbbing pulse
of
the music vibrates right through you.“ Reginald Laubin and
Gladys Laubin,
lndian Dances
of
North America
(Norman: University
of
Okla-
homa Press,
1977), 94.
6.
7.
8.
10.
11.
Slotkin,
The Menomini Powwow,
35.
Slotkin argues that powwow drumming and singing “welds” partici-
pants “into a collective unity.“ See Slotkin,
The Menominee Powwow,
14.
My
argument that powwow music and dance both reveal and reinforce ethical and
philosophical beliefs is ‘consistent with the research that
I
cited earlier in
endnote
3
above.
12.
13.
Recorded on tape by author,
9
July
1993,
Prairie Island, Minnesota.
For an extended discussion of this partial consolidation of styles, see,
especially, William
K.
Powers,
War Dance: Plains lndian Musical Pevformance
(Tucson: University of Arizona Press,
1990).
The literature on power is extensive. A common, although by no means
simple or uncontested, distinction made about power
is
between “power over”
and “power to,” referring to a sense of power as domination and constraint on
14.
The
Powzoow
as
a
Public
Arena
201
the one hand and power as a positive capacity on the other hand. See, for
example, Thomas Wartenberg,
The
Forms
of
Power:
From
Domination to Transfor-
rnation
(Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1990) for both a summary of this
basic distinction between power as domination and power as capacity and a
challenge to
it.
For summaries and applications of contemporary literatures on
power, see John Gaventa,
Power and Powerlessness: Quiescence and Rebellion in an
Appalachian Valley
(Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1980), and Peter Digeser,
“The Fourth Face of Power,”
TIze
Ioiirnal of Politics
54:4
(November 1992): 977-
1007.
15.
See Thomas Vennum, Jr., “The Changing Role of Women in Ojibway
Music History,” in
Women in North American Indian Music,
ed. Richard Keeling
(The Society for Ethnomusicology, Inc., Special Series No. 6,1989),
20.
The
two
most common explanations for women’s exclusion from drum groups are that
it
is traditional and, as one scholar put
it,
”it
is
strictly taboo” for a menstruating
woman to participate in certain ceremonial and cultural practices (Judith
Vander, “From the Musical Experience of Five Shoshone Women,” In
Women
in
North
American Indian Music,
5).
This form of gender inequality is not necessar-
ily
indicative of gender relations in all aspects of American Indian life. For one
brief discussion of an attempt to form an all-women drum group, see Vennum,
”The Changing Role of Women in Ojibway Music History,”
13.
Vennum refers
to a women‘s drum group at Minnesota‘s Red Lake qibwe Reservation, briefly
active during 1973, which was “ridiculed during their first public performance”
but later met with limited, grudging acceptance. Vennum does not say how
long this women’s drum circle remained active. Finally, it should be noted that
American Indian women disagree over the significance of their exclusion from
drum groups. While some are critical of this exclusion, others defend the
practice.
16. Other examples of how powwows are gendered include the fact that
most emcees are male, that military veterans-the vast majority of whom are
male- often are honored, and that the related overall commitment
is
to
warriorism.
This occurred, for example, at the 1993 Lac du Flambeau, Wisconsin,
Ojibwe powwow (John Sanford [pseud.], interview by author, tape recording,
11
June 1993, Minneapolis, MN), the 1993 Prairie Island Dakota powwow
(recorded on tape by author, 9 July 1993, Prairie Island, Minnesota), and the
1991
Black
River Falls Winnebago powwow (Sanford, interview, 1993).
17.