Part I
Section 401.--Qualified pension, profit-sharing, and stock bonus plans
26 CFR 1.401(a)(4)-4: Nondiscriminatory availability of benefits, rights, and features
Rev. Rul. 2004-21
ISSUE
Does a plan that is funded, in whole or in part, with life insurance contracts
satisfy the requirements of § 401(a)(4) of the Internal Revenue Code prohibiting
discrimination in favor of highly compensated employees where: (1) highly
compensated employees are permitted, prior to distribution of retirement benefits, to
purchase life insurance contracts from the plan at cash surrender value; and (2) any
rights under the plan for nonhighly compensated employees to purchase life insurance
contracts from the plan prior to distribution of retirement benefits are not of inherently
equal or greater value than the purchase rights of highly compensated employees?
FACTS
Employer M maintains Plan A, a retirement plan that is intended to be a qualified
plan under § 401(a). Plan A provides an incidental death benefit within the meaning of
§ 1.401-1(b)(1)(i) of the Income Tax Regulations for each participant, and holds a life
insurance contract on the life of each participant to fund that incidental death benefit.
Before distributions to a participant under Plan A commence, each participant is offered
the opportunity to purchase the life insurance contract under which the participant is
insured from Plan A for its cash surrender value. It is assumed for purposes of this
revenue ruling that Prohibited Transaction Exemption 92-6, 57 FR 5189 (February 12,
1992) applies to the purchase of a life insurance contract from Plan A and, thus, a
participant’s purchase of a life insurance contract from Plan A is not a prohibited
transaction under § 4975. Employer M has nonhighly compensated employees that are
not excludable employees within the meaning of § 1.410(b)-6, and the features of the
life insurance contracts covering the lives of highly compensated employees are
different than the features of the life insurance contracts covering the lives of nonhighly
compensated employees. In addition, because of these differences in the features of
the contracts, the rights that the nonhighly compensated employees have to purchase
the life insurance contracts under which they are insured from Plan A are not of
inherently equal or greater value than the rights that highly compensated employees
have to purchase the life insurance contracts under which they are insured.
LAW AND ANALYSIS
Section 401(a)(4) provides that, under a qualified retirement plan, contributions
or benefits provided under the plan must not discriminate in favor of highly
compensated employees. Section 410(b) provides minimum coverage requirements
2
that are designed to ensure that a qualified plan provides sufficient benefits to a large
enough proportion of participants who are nonhighly compensated employees.
Section 1.401(a)(4)-1(b)(3) provides that a plan satisfies the requirements of
§ 401(a)(4) only if all benefits, rights and features provided under the plan are made
available under the plan in a nondiscriminatory manner. Under § 1.401(a)(4)-4(a),
benefits, rights and features (i.e., optional forms of benefit, ancillary benefits, and other
rights or features) are made available under the plan in a nondiscriminatory manner
only if each benefit, right or feature satisfies the current availability requirement of
§ 1.401(a)(4)-4(b) and the effective availability requirement of § 1.401(a)(4)-4(c). In
general, a benefit, right or feature satisfies the current availability requirement of
§ 1.401(a)(4)-4(b) for a plan year if the group of employees to whom the benefit, right or
feature is currently available during the plan year satisfies § 410(b) (without regard to
the average benefit percentage test of § 1.410(b)-5).
An other right or feature is any right or feature applicable to employees under the
plan (other than a benefit formula, an optional form of benefit, or an ancillary benefit)
that can be expected to have meaningful value. Under § 1.401(a)(4)-4(e)(3)(i), a
distinct other right or feature exists if a right or feature is not available on substantially
the same terms as another right or feature. Under § 1.401(a)(4)-4(e)(3)(iii)(C), the right
to a particular form of investment, including, for example, a particular class or type of
employer securities (taking into account, in determining whether different forms of
investment exist, any differences in conversion, dividend, voting, liquidation preference,
or other rights conferred under the security) is a distinct other right or feature. Similarly,
differences in insurance contracts (e.g., differences in cash value growth terms or
different exchange features) that may be purchased from a plan can create distinct
other rights or features even if the terms under which the contracts are purchased from
the plan are the same.
Under § 1.401(a)(4)-4(d)(4), an optional form of benefit, ancillary benefit, or other
right or feature is permitted to be aggregated with another optional form of benefit,
ancillary benefit, or other right or feature if one of the two is, in all cases, of inherently
equal or greater value than the other, and the optional form of benefit, ancillary benefit,
or other right or feature that is of inherently equal or greater value separately satisfies
the current availability requirement of § 1.401(a)(4)-4(b) and the effective availability
requirement of § 1.401(a)(4)-4(c). For this purpose, one benefit, right, or feature is of
inherently equal or greater value than another benefit, right, or feature only if, at any
time and under any conditions, it is impossible for any employee to receive a smaller
amount or a less valuable right under the first benefit, right, or feature than under the
second benefit, right, or feature.
To the extent the purchase from Plan A of a life insurance contract by a highly
compensated employee is a distribution alternative with respect to benefits described in
§ 411(d)(6)(A), such a purchase right is an optional form of benefit under Plan A. Even
in situations in which this purchase right is not an optional form of benefit, this purchase
right is an other right or feature. The purchase rights for the highly compensated
3
employees are distinct optional forms of benefit or other rights or features from the
purchase rights for nonhighly compensated employees because of differences in the life
insurance contracts (analogous to a conversion right applicable to a security). This
purchase right for highly compensated employees does not satisfy the current
availability requirement of § 1.401(a)(4)-4(b) because the right to purchase the contracts
of a type available to the highly compensated employees is not available to any
nonhighly compensated employees, and therefore is not available to a group that
satisfies the requirements of § 410(b). Moreover, under the facts presented, this
purchase right of highly compensated employees cannot satisfy the requirements of
§ 1.401(a)(4)-4 through aggregation with any other optional form of benefit, ancillary
benefit, or other right or feature (such as the purchase right for nonhighly compensated
employees) because no other optional form of benefit, ancillary benefit, or other right or
feature under the plan that would enable the aggregated benefits to be available to a
group that satisfies the requirements of § 410(b) is of inherently equal or greater value.
Thus, Plan A fails to satisfy the nondiscrimination requirements of § 401(a)(4).
HOLDING
A plan that is funded, in whole or in part, with life insurance contracts does not
satisfy the requirements of § 401(a)(4) prohibiting discrimination in favor of highly
compensated employees where: (1) the plan permits highly compensated employees,
prior to distribution of retirement benefits, to purchase those life insurance contracts
prior to distribution; and (2) any rights under the plan for nonhighly compensated
employees to purchase life insurance contracts from the plan prior to distribution of
retirement benefits are not of inherently equal or greater value than the purchase rights
of highly compensated employees.
DRAFTING INFORMATION
The principal authors of this revenue ruling are Larry Isaacs of Employee Plans,
Tax Exempt and Government Entities Division, and Linda Marshall of the Office of the
Division Counsel/Associate Chief Counsel, Tax Exempt and Government Entities. For
further information regarding this revenue ruling, contact the Employee Plans taxpayer
assistance telephone service between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 6:30 p.m. Eastern
Time, Monday through Friday, by calling (877) 829-5500 (a toll-free number). Mr.
Isaacs may be reached at (202) 283-9710, and Ms. Marshall may be reached at (202)
622-6090 (not toll-free numbers).