Sealing Warrants - 1
SEALING WARRANTS
Michael Crowell, UNC School of Government (Jan. 2015)
Contents
I. Public Records Law .........................................................................................................1
II. Constitutional Issues in Sealing Warrants ........................................................................1
III. Procedure .........................................................................................................................1
I. Public Records Law. Under the Public Records Law (G.S. Chapter 132) arrest and
search warrants become public records once they have been served by law enforcement
and returned to the clerk, unless they are sealed by court order. See G.S. 132-1.4(k).
The statute provides no further guidance on when warrants should be sealed or the
procedure to be followed. The statutes do not specify how soon a warrant is to be
returned to the clerk after being executed.
II. Constitutional Issues in Sealing Warrants.
A. First Amendment. There is no First Amendment right of public access to
warrants. In re Investigation into Death of Cooper, 200 N.C. App. 180 (2009).
B. North Carolina Constitution. There is, however, a qualified right of access
under Art. 1, § 18 of the North Carolina Constitution (“All courts shall be open.”).
Cooper; Virmani v. Presbyterian Health Services Corp., 350 N.C. 449 (1999).
The qualified right of public access to warrants may be restricted by sealing
warrants when doing so is “essential to preserve higher values and is narrowly
tailored to serve that interest.” Cooper, 683 S.E. 2d at 427, quoting Baltimore
Sun Company v. Goetz, 886 F.2d 60, 65 (4th Cir. 1989).
1. Higher Values. Higher values that may justify sealing a warrant include
protection of the defendant’s right to a fair trial, maintenance of the
integrity of an ongoing investigation, protection of the state’s right to
prosecute a defendant, protecting the privacy rights of an innocent third
party, and protection of witnesses and third parties.
2. Narrowly Tailored. The “narrowly tailored” requirement means that a
warrant should not be sealed if there is a lesser alternative that serves the
need for protection, such as redacting a portion of the warrant or sealing
only the affidavit accompanying the warrant application. It also means
that the warrant should not remain sealed any longer than necessary to
serve the purpose; e.g., if a search warrant needs to be sealed to protect
an ongoing investigation, it should not remain sealed after an arrest has
been made.
3. Contents of Order. The order sealing a warrant must include specific
findings justifying the action. The order may adopt the facts presented by
the prosecution but the decision must be made by the court. Cooper, 200
N.C. App.180
III. Procedure. Some districts have local rules or administrative orders about sealing
warrants. The rules may specify, for example, who may apply for an order sealing a
warrant, who hears the request, and how long the warrant remains sealed.
It is recommended that the request for sealing be made by written motion.