Adapted from Rubric by Denise Kreiger, Instructional Design and Technology Services, SC&I, Rutgers University, 4/2014
Group Classroom Presentation Sample Rubric – Page 1
*Please note that this is a sample of a group presentation scoring rubric for your reference and is not from any
Graziadio class. Check with your professor for their scoring rubric specific to your class and assignment.
Criteria
Unsatisfactory
Developing
Accomplished
Exemplary
Presentation
Content
(Group grade)
Presentation content shows a lack of
understanding of the topic. There is
inadequate evidence of research and
insufficient relevant information and
facts. Content is confusing and/or
contains frequent inaccuracies.
Required elements are missing
and/or randomly organized. Sources,
if included, generally lack proper
citation format (APA 6
th
ed.).
Presentation content shows
general understanding of the
topic. There is limited evidence of
research in locating relevant
information and facts and/or
supporting statements made.
Content contains some
inaccuracies, inconsistencies,
misinterpretations, and/or
somewhat unclear. A required
element may be missing and/or
some sources may be improperly
cited (APA 6
th
ed.).
Presentation content shows an
adequate understanding of the topic.
Some research effort is evident in
locating relevant information and facts.
Content is mostly accurate and
reasonably organized. May contain
some inconsistencies in content or
some connections made may not be
supported. Required elements are
included and sources are properly cited
(APA 6
th
ed.) for the most part.
Presentation content shows a thorough
understanding of the topic. Substantive
research effort is evident in locating
relevant information and facts. Content is
accurate and sequenced in a clear, logical
way. All required elements are included
and sources are properly cited (APA 6
th
ed.).
Presentation Design
(Group Grade)
Slides generally lack visual appeal
and are text-heavy with little or no
visuals and/or exhibit an overuse of
color or animations. Media, (e.g.,
images), if used, are rarely cited on
each slide. No theme is evident and
the presentation appears disjointed
rather than unified and/or frequent
errors (grammar, punctuation,
spelling, formatting, etc.) on the
slides
Slides generally include a mix of
white space, visuals, and/or text
but not consistently and/or some
overuse or inappropriate use of
color or animations. Theme (e.g.,
template) is not consistently
evident throughout the
presentation and/or some errors
(grammar, punctuation, spelling,
formatting, etc.) on the slides.
Slides are effectively designed with
visual appeal including white space,
visuals, and minimal text for the most
part. Color and animations are used
appropriately. Theme (e.g., template) is
evident in the presentation for the
most part to produce a cohesive
presentation and/or minor errors
(grammar, punctuation, spelling,
formatting, etc.) on the slides.
Slides are visually well designed,
aesthetically pleasing with appropriate
use of white space, visuals, and minimal
text, on each slide. Color and animations
are used judiciously. Theme (e.g.,
template) is evident throughout to
produce a highly cohesive presentation.
Basically free from errors (grammar,
punctuation, spelling, formatting, etc.) on
the slides.
Presentation
Oral Delivery
(Group grade)
Ineffective in delivering the oral
presentation demonstrating below
average/poor communication skills.
Substantially over/under the time
limit to present and/or not all
members presented. Lack of
preparation was evident.
Somewhat effective in delivering
the oral presentation
demonstrating average
communication skills. Slightly
over/under the time limit. Some
members presented more than
others. More preparation was
needed.
Effective in delivering the oral
presentation demonstrating good
communication skills and generally
close to the time limit for the group to
present (20 minutes total). All group
members presented and preparation
was evident for the most part.
Highly effective in delivering a well-
polished oral presentation within the time
limit for the group to present (20 minutes
total). All group members presented
equally. Preparation was strongly evident.
Adapted from Rubric by Denise Kreiger, Instructional Design and Technology Services, SC&I, Rutgers University, 4/2014
Group Classroom Presentation Sample Rubric – Page 2
Criteria
Unsatisfactory
Developing
Exemplary
Presentation
Notes/
Transcript
(Group grade)
Presentation lacks “Notes” on slides
(or in a separate document) to
explain each slide and/or, if included,
the notes repeat the text provided
on the slide. Writing demonstrates a
below average/poor writing style
with frequent errors in spelling,
grammar, punctuation, and/or usage.
Minimal “Notes” are included in
the presentation slides (or in a
separate document) and/or are
sporadically provided. Writing
demonstrates an average
writing style with some errors in
spelling, grammar, punctuation,
and/or usage.
“Notes” are included in the presentation (or in a
separate document) to fully explain each slide as a
written transcript. Writing demonstrates a strong
writing style basically free from grammar,
punctuation, spelling, or usage errors.
Contribution to
Group
(Individual grade)
Based on students’ journal
reflections or feedback evaluation
forms, group member rarely
participated or contributed to the
project towards achieving the goals
and meeting the deadline. Did not
share workload fairly and/or was a
disruptive influence.
Based on students’ journal
reflections or feedback
evaluation forms, group
member participated in the
project but emphasis was in
completing own work. Allowed
others to assume leadership
and/or may have not shared
workload fairly towards
achieving the project goals and
meeting the deadline.
Based on students’ journal reflections or feedback
evaluation forms, group member participated fully
in the project and shared the workload fairly.
Contributed to the development of the
presentation and assisted in editing others’ work to
produce a polished presentation. Coordinated
group’s efforts and/or demonstrated leadership to
facilitate and achieve the project goals and meet
deadline.
Timeliness and
Length of
Presentation
(Group grade)
Collaborative presentation is
completed 2-3 days (49-72 hours) or
more after the deadline and/or
substantially lacks/exceeds the
required length.
Collaborative presentation is
completed 1-2 days (25-48
hours) after the deadline and/or
is somewhat lacking (or
exceeds) the required length.
Collaborative presentation is completed by the
deadline and meets the required length (10-15
slides).
TOTAL POINTS is the sum of 6 Criteria