2 LET’S PREPARE HEALTHY SCHOOL BREAKFAST
Focusing on the School Breakfast Program (SBP)
has never been more important.
This program has a disproportionately high impact on low-
income students, who are more likely to eat breakfast and
lunch at school, and it is easily the most-skipped meal of the
day across all populations. Participation is associated with a
lower body mass index (BMI, an indicator of excess body fat),
a lower probability of being overweight, and a lower
probability of obesity.
1,2
A good breakfast also gives children
the energy they need to succeed in school, improving their
concentration, alertness, comprehension, memory, and
learning.
3,4,5
This is why is it essential that those who do not
have the time, appetite, or household income necessary to eat
before school have the opportunity to do so when they arrive.
There are a variety of ways to serve breakfast at school, from
traditional cafeteria models to Grab & Go and Breakfast in
the Classroom (BIC). Among school food advocates, BIC has
become an unofficial gold standard due to its high participation
rates. However, the model that works best for a particular
school will depend on a number of considerations, including
the percentage of students eligible for free- or reduced-price
school meals, the availability of cafeteria space and staff,
the school’s start time, and the morning bus schedules.
The best way to increase breakfast participation is by making
a breakfast model change that incorporates breakfast into
the school day, such as BIC. Project Bread recognizes that,
unfortunately, schools often struggle to offer fresh, healthy
BIC meals due to the logistics of moving breakfast into the
classroom. In an attempt to solve this problem, we have
created a two-week cycle menu that focuses on healthy
breakfast options that could be used in alternative breakfast
models. Since we realize that not all schools can do alternative
models, we have also included a two-week-cycle menu for
a traditional breakfast model. The two-week cycle menus
adhere to the new USDA regulations– promoting fresh
fruit and whole grain rich products – and offer recipes that
students will want to eat.
To ensure that these menus are easy to implement, we
accounted for food components, equivalents, and weekly
totals. We surveyed major food distributors in Massachusetts
and provided a list of sample products. We included charts
summarizing the USDA’s Whole Grain-Rich Ounce Equivalency
(oz eq) and SBP nutrition requirements. Lastly, we recognized
that budgets vary across districts and factored total cost into
our choices. By combining these resources, we hope we have
created a useful guide for offering healthy options through
alternative service models.
DISCLAIMERS Please note that these menus are intended to be used
as a guide. Schools are responsible for obtaining their specific product
information to ensure that the USDA guidelines are being met.
1 Gleason, P. M. & Dodd, A. H. (2009). School breakfast program but not school lunch program participation is associated with lower body mass index.
Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 109(2 Supplement 1), S118¬S128.
2 Millimet, D. L., Tchernis, R., & Husain, M. (2009). School nutrition programs and the incidence of childhood obesity.
Journal of Human Resources, 45(3), 640¬654.
3 Grantham-McGregor S, Chang S, Walker S. “Evaluation of School Feeding Programs: Some Jamaican Examples.”
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 1998; 67(4) 785S¬789S.
4 Brown JL, Beardslee WH, Prothrow¬Stith D. “Impact of School Breakfast on Children’s Health and Learning.”
Sodexo Foundation. November2008
5 Morris CT, Courtney A, Bryant CA, McDermott RJ. “Grab ‘N’ Go Breakfast at School: Observation from a Pilot Program.”
Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior 2010 42(3): 208¬209.